Bryan L. Fearey, Denise C. Parent, Richard A. Keller, and Charles M. Miller, "Doppler-free saturation spectroscopy of lutetium isotopes through resonance-ionization mass spectrometry," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 7, 3-8 (1990)
Saturation spectroscopy with resonance-ionization mass spectrometry detection was used to obtain Doppler-free spectra of the
transition of lutetium at 22 125 cm−1 in unenriched, naturally occurring samples. Analysis of the spectra yielded the hyperf ine coupling constants of 175Lu and 176Lu for this transition. Applications to isotopically selective photoionization and large-ratio isotopic analysis are discussed.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
The 3, 3 transition has zero intensity and therefore is neither listed nor seen.
The numbers in parentheses indicate uncertainties.
Values calculated from hyperfine constants determined from a weighted average of the fits to the two data sets. These uncertainties are a worst-case estimate.
Crossover peaks.
Table 2
176Lu Hyperfine Features: Relative Frequency Positions (mK)
The 6.5, 6.5 transition has only a classical fractional intensity of 0.004 and neither it nor its crossover peak combinations were observed.
Numbers in parentheses indicate uncertainties.
Values calculated from hyperfine constants determined from a weighted average of the fits to the two data sets. These uncertainties are a worst-case estimate.
Crossover peaks.
Determined using A″ and B″ from Ref. 21 (this table 2, row 2).
Calculated assuming that known ground-state 176/175 hyperfine splitting constant ratios apply to excited states (see Table 4, row 2).
The 3, 3 transition has zero intensity and therefore is neither listed nor seen.
The numbers in parentheses indicate uncertainties.
Values calculated from hyperfine constants determined from a weighted average of the fits to the two data sets. These uncertainties are a worst-case estimate.
Crossover peaks.
Table 2
176Lu Hyperfine Features: Relative Frequency Positions (mK)
The 6.5, 6.5 transition has only a classical fractional intensity of 0.004 and neither it nor its crossover peak combinations were observed.
Numbers in parentheses indicate uncertainties.
Values calculated from hyperfine constants determined from a weighted average of the fits to the two data sets. These uncertainties are a worst-case estimate.
Crossover peaks.
Determined using A″ and B″ from Ref. 21 (this table 2, row 2).
Calculated assuming that known ground-state 176/175 hyperfine splitting constant ratios apply to excited states (see Table 4, row 2).