Abstract
Consider a generally aberrated one-dimensional (1D) optical pupil P illuminated by quasi-monochromatic light of mean wavelength In past work it was found that, if the pupil’s intensity point-spread function (psf) is multiply convolved with itself, as in an imaging relay system, and then ideally (stigmatically) demagnified, the resulting psf approaches a fixed Cauchy form which is independent of the aberrations of the pupil. Here is the Nyquist sampling interval given by with f the f/number of the pupil. This Cauchy form for this intensity psf also manifestly lacks sidelobes. The overall questions that we examine are how far do these effects carry over to the case of a circular, two-dimensional (2D) pupil, and to what extent do practical imaging considerations compromise the theoretical results? It is found that, in the presence of spherical aberration of all orders, the resulting theoretical psf of a large number of self-convolutions approaches a “circular” Cauchy form, where is the Nyquist sampling interval with f the f/number of the (now) circular pupil. Thus, for these aberrations the 1D effect does carry over to the 2D case: The output psf does not depend on the aberrations and completely lacks sidelobes. However, when all aberrations are generally present, the output psf does depend on the aberrations, although its azimuthal average over θ still preserves the circular Cauchy form, as a superposition of Cauchy functions. Imaging requirements for achieving these ideal effects are briefly discussed as well as probability laws for photons that are implied by the above-mentioned PSF’s and Real-time super resolution is not attained, since the stigmatic imaging demanded of the demagnification step requires the use of a larger-apertured lens. Rather, the approach achieves significant aberration suppression.
© 2004 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Sudhakar Prasad
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(11) 2073-2088 (2004)
Virendra N. Mahajan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2(6) 833-846 (1985)
Richard A. Frazin
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 33(4) 712-725 (2016)