Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Unsupervised clustering of multiparametric fluorescent images extends the spectrum of detectable cell membrane phases with sub-micrometric resolution

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Solvatochromic probes undergo an emission shift when the hydration level of the membrane environment increases and are commonly used to distinguish between solid-ordered and liquid-disordered phases in artificial membrane bilayers. This emission shift is currently limited in unraveling the broad spectrum of membrane phases of natural cell membranes and their spatial organization. Spectrally resolved fluorescence lifetime imaging can provide pixel-resolved multiparametric information about the biophysical state of the membranes, like membrane hydration, microviscosity and the partition coefficient of the probe. Here, we introduce a clustering based analysis that, leveraging the multiparametric content of spectrally resolved lifetime images, allows us to classify through an unsupervised learning approach multiple membrane phases with sub-micrometric resolution. This method extends the spectrum of detectable membrane phases allowing to dissect and characterize up to six different phases, and to study real-time phase transitions in cultured cells and tissues undergoing different treatments. We applied this method to investigate membrane remodeling induced by high glucose on PC-12 neuronal cells, associated with the development of diabetic neuropathy. Due to its wide applicability, this method provides a new paradigm in the analysis of environmentally sensitive fluorescent probes.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Cell membranes are composed of many different types of lipids, including saturated and unsaturated phospholipids, cholesterol, and fatty acids. Membrane lipids can interchange among several membrane phases, which are supramolecular structures having relatively uniform chemical and physical properties. At low temperatures, artificial lipid bilayers composed by a limited number of phospholipids are laterally ordered and well-packed together in the membrane, in a solid ordered, gel-like phase (so). Raising temperatures over a transition value (melting temperature, Tm), characteristic of the phospholipid composition, induces the transition to a fluid-like, liquid-disordered phase (ld), which is characterized by a larger area occupied by polar heads of phospholipids. Sufficiently high membrane sterol concentration triggers the emergence of the liquid-ordered phase (lo), which possesses solid-like qualities similar to so though maintaining the high rate of lateral diffusion of the ld phase. Cell membranes display more complex behavior, consisting of a mosaic of multiple phases coexisting in the lipid bilayer [1,2]. The heterogeneity of cell membranes cannot be simplified to mere differentiation of coexisting lipid domains since the number of lipid species is significantly higher with respect to artificial bilayers, and high local concentrations of membrane-associated proteins create lateral pressure that renders lipid domain separation more thermodynamically favorable, possibly leading to phase transitions or to the emergence of new phases [2]. The resulting membrane phase dynamic equilibrium reflects changes in the lipid and protein composition, as imposed by dietary, environmental, and cellular conditions. The maintenance of this dynamic equilibrium is a prerequisite for proper membrane function and it is associated with cell viability and normal cell growth and division [3]. For example, membrane phase separation has a pivotal role in the potency of ligand binding to membrane receptors, on direct cell-cell interaction and the modulation of the activity of membrane enzymes, receptors, channels, and transporters [1,47], and membrane phase alterations have been described in various pathologies, such as thrombocythemia, hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, obesity, in Alzheimer's disease and schizophrenia [3,69].

The fluorescence emission spectrum of solvatochromic and lipophilic probes, as Laurdan or Nile Red, which incorporates into the lipid phase in the membrane, is traditionally a powerful tool to resolve in real-time, with pixel resolution, the phase state of membranes, alterations in lipid composition and modified cell signaling [1014]. The excited-state relaxation of solvatochromic probes is highly sensitive to the presence and mobility of water molecules within the membrane bilayer, resulting in a red-shift of their emission spectrum in going from gel-like phases to disordered, liquid-crystalline phases. The spatial distribution of coexisting lipid domains, determined according to distinctive fluorescence spectra and dual-wavelength ratio measurements [1517], allows mapping changes in the structure of cell membranes in physiological and pathological contexts [6,12,18,19]and monitoring lipid storage and lipolysis pathways [20,21]. However, the ratio approach presents some limits, since it is based on a single parameter, not providing for a specific, pixel-resolved classification of the variety of phases that characterize membranes of living cells. [14]. At present, even using more sophisticated analysis methods as the spectral phasors [18], it is only possible a hydration-driven classification of membrane phases. Here, we aim to improve the confocal analysis based on the dual-channel acquisition by using spectrally resolved fluorescence lifetime imaging of cells labeled with solvatochromic probes. This technique captures multiparametric information about the biophysical state of the membranes, enabling a proficient distinction of membrane phases. Through this technique, each pixel is labeled by its intensity value, the solvatochromic spectral shift, and the spectrally resolved fluorescence lifetime of the probe, thus providing information on the partition coefficient of the probe within the phase, the hydration level and the microviscosity of the phase, respectively. To perform a quantitative analysis, we introduce an artificial intelligence clustering tool (k-means) that, leveraging on the multiparametric content of spectrally resolved lifetime images, results in the extension of the spectrum of detectable membrane phases. This clustering method, which was already applied to fluorescence intensity and lifetime dataset [22,23], going beyond the classical two-state classification, provides the classification and the characterization of multiple phases and enables the real-time investigation with the sub-micrometric resolution of cell membrane phase transitions in living cells and tissues in different physiological and pathological conditions. We applied this method to investigate the effects of membrane remodeling induced by high glucose on PC-12 neuronal cells. High glucose-induced neuronal cell death is responsible for the development of diabetic neuropathy [24], and although important abnormalities in energy metabolism have already been assessed, the related effects of membrane remodeling and lipid metabolism are still unclear.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Cell cultures and fluorescence labeling

PC-12 rat pheochromocytoma cell line, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), is routinely maintained in standard RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, USA), completed with fetal calf serum (FCS), Sodium Pyruvate and HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), Pen/Strep and β-Mercaptoethanol (Gibco, USA) and differentiated with Nerve Growth Factor (Gibco, USA) (50 ng/ml for 2 weeks). For the artificial intelligence-based analysis, 1 µl of 1 mM stock solution of Laurdan (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) is added per milliliter of medium and cells are treated with 11 mM, 50 mM and 75 mM glucose for 48 h before labeling. For organelle labeling experiments, 1 µl of 1 mM stock solution of Nile Red (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) is added per milliliter of medium and incubated for at least 30 minutes in the dark for staining intracellular lipid droplets (LD). 40 µl of different fluorescent protein-based markers, CellLight ER-GFP BacMam 2.0, CellLight Golgi-GFP BacMam 2.0 and CellLight Mitochondria-GFP BacMam 2.0 (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA), are used for the staining of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), Golgi apparatus and mitochondria, respectively. Incubation is performed for 16 hours at 37 °C.

2.2 Image acquisition settings

Laurdan emission intensity images are acquired with a Nikon A1-MP confocal microscope equipped with a 60× oil-immersion objective (1.4 NA), a 2-photon Ti:Sapphire laser (MAI TAI DEEP SEE EHPDS -007 (2017), Spectra Physics, Newport Beach, CA) producing <70-fs pulses at a repetition rate of 80 ± 1 MHz. A PML-SPEC 16 GaAsP (B&H, Germany) multi-wavelength detector (grating part is the No. 77414) coupled to a SPC-830 TCSPC/FLIM device (B&H, Germany) working in FIFO mode is used to collect the decay data. Calibration was performed through the registration of second harmonic generation (SHG) signals registered at several excitation wavelengths, as recommended by the manufacturer. The software used for acquisition is SPCM-64 (B&H, Germany). Laurdan fluorophore is excited at 780 nm. This value constitutes a good compromise between the maximization of absorption and the reduction of autofluorescence excitation. Signals are integrated into the time window of width 12.5 ns and into the wavelength region 400-600 nm. For image acquisition, the pixel frame size is set to 512 × 512 and the pixel dwell time is 60 µs. Imaging is performed at 37°C with 5% CO2 (cage incubator OKOLAB). The average laser power at the sample is maintained at the mW level (10 mW). For FLIM, data are acquired, without performing time integration Signals are integrated into the wavelength region 420–460 nm for the blue channel (Iblue(t,x,y)) and 500–560 nm for the green channel (Igreen(t,x,y)). FLIM acquisitions provide for the decay curves, for each pixel.

2.3 Fluorescence intensity microscopy for the partition coefficient determination: construction of the P-image

Fluorescence intensity of a lipophilic probe in the membrane phase is proportional to the partition coefficient P, defined as the ratio of the emission intensity of the probe between the phase at pixel (x,y) and a reference phase:

$$\textrm{Log}[{P({\textrm{x},\textrm{y}} )} ]= \textrm{log}\left( {\frac{{{I_{x,y}}}}{{{I_{ref}}}}} \right)$$
where ${I_{x,y}}$ is the emission intensity of Laurdan at the pixel(x,y) integrated on the whole emission spectrum, and ${I_{ref}}$ is the emission intensity of Laurdan in a reference phase. The reference phase is the phase characteristic of the core of LD, which is characterized by the highest uptake of the Laurdan probe (Fig. S1), as already qualitatively observed in [25]. Therefore, the log P value we defined herein is a measure of the hydrophobicity of the membrane taking the LD as a reference. The use of LD’s Laurdan intensity as reference for maximum has been chosen accordingly to the high compartmentalization of the probe in these organelles, as also observed in a previous article [25]. In the Supplement 1, the detailed workflow for the determination of the reference is described.

P value is dependent on the composition and the physical state of the membrane phase, and especially on the distribution, length and three-dimensional organization of the hydrophobic tails. The P value is calculated pixel-by-pixel using the equation [1] yielding the P image, which is one of the three image inputs for the unsupervised analysis. Background values are measured and subtracted for each image, and debris or other aggregates are removed to avoid biases in the analysis. Background values are removed using the software SPC-image 8.1 (B&H, Germany) through the function ‘Threshold’. This function defines the minimum number of photons in the peak of a fluorescence curve. Pixel with lower photon number are not analyzed by the fitting procedure, therefore suppressing dark pixels. This value is sampled on n=100 curves on the area outside cells, ranging from 5 to 10.

2.4 Fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy for membrane hydration determination: construction of the GP image

For the fluorescence ratio imaging approach, the same experimental setup and the same acquisition data are used, but signals are integrated in the time window of width 12.5 ns and into the wavelength region 420–460 nm for the blue channel and 500–560 nm for the green channel to evaluate the spectral shift of the probe. The fluorescence spectrum of the probe Laurdan, which incorporates into the lipid phase in the membrane, is correlated to its physical state. Laurdan’s excited-state relaxation is highly sensitive to the presence and mobility of water molecules within the membrane bilayer, yielding information on membrane hydration by a shift in its emission spectrum depending on the surrounding lipid phase state (i.e. bluish in ordered, gel phases and greenish in disordered, liquid-crystalline phases) [26]. By using this probe, coexisting lipid domains are labeled according to their distinctive fluorescence spectra and dual-wavelength ratio measurements. As a normalized ratio of the intensity at the two emission wavelength regions, the generalized polarization (GP) provides a measure of membrane order (high membrane micropolarity, low GP; low membrane micropolarity, high GP). The GP index is calculated for each pixel using the two Laurdan intensity images Iblue(x,y) and Igreen(x,y) [27], according to the following formula:

$$GP = \frac{{{I_{blue}}({x,y} )- G{I_{red}}({x,y} )}}{{{I_{blue}}({x,y} )+ G{I_{red}}({x,y} )}}$$
G is a correction factor calculated by using the following Eq.
$$G = \frac{{G{P_{theo}} + G{P_{theo}} \times G{P_{exp}} - 1 - G{P_{exp}}}}{{G{P_{theo}} \times G{P_{exp}} - G{P_{theo}} + G{P_{exp}} - 1}}$$
where $G{P_{theo}}$ is the GP theoretical value of a standard solution of 5µM Laurdan in DMSO, which has a known value ($G{P_{theo}}$=0.207), where-as $G{P_{exp}}$ is the GP value of the same solution measured in our confocal microscope [28].

GP index is independent of excitation intensities, probe concentrations, and other artefacts, relying on the ratiometric properties of the probe [6,15].

2.5 Fluorescence lifetime microscopy for microviscosity determination: construction of the η image

To determine the lifetime, especially when the decay time exceeds 30% of the 12.5 ns time window, a good estimate of τgreen and τblue is retrieved by fitting the data with an incomplete-decay model which includes the fluorescence remaining from the previous laser pulses in the model function. This is the case of Laurdan lifetime as in [29]. The model is a sum of exponential terms, taking into account the fluorescence that does not fully decay within a single laser pulse period. Based on ‘Repetition Time’ the fluorescence leftover from all previous excitation pulses is included in the model [30]. The ‘offset’ is kept fixed and set to zero. With the PML-16-GaAsP detector, this situation is achieved by strictly avoiding pickup of room light. This was obtained by using obscuring panels applied to the OKOLAB cage incubator, thus realizing total dark in the acquisition chamber. The value of the background was measured for our setup and the average photon count for each pixel on a 512 × 512 image is 0.48 ± 0.8. In membranes, the solvent relaxation (decrease in GP), analyzed so far, depends on the number of the surrounding water molecules, and thus increases with membrane hydration levels [31]. This effect can be also revealed by a decrease of the fluorescence lifetime due to the enhanced emission from the relaxed state, which is characterized by a lower lifetime. Another quantity that can be measured analyzing the fluorescence decay is the rate of solvent relaxation, obtained by measuring the rate of the spectral shift [31,32]. The speed of solvent relaxation is related to the rotational mobility of the water molecules within the membrane and is referred to as membrane microviscosity [29]. When the rate of spectral relaxation is in the picosecond scale, the temporal resolution of the time-correlated single photon counting devices is not able to resolve any changes. However, in very viscous environments the time scale of relaxation can increase up to the nanosecond time scale. In this context, the change in membrane polarity due to water hydration from the effects due to viscosity can be uncovered by analyzing the decay time of the blue channel (emission: 450/50 nm) and the green channel (emission: 540/50 nm) [32]. The excited-state decay in the blue channel presents an apparent decay time that reduces the standard decay time of the fluorescence emission from the relaxed state because the depopulating process from the locally excited state to the relaxed state contributes to the overall decay. Conversely, the excited-state decay in the green channel increases due to the populating process from the locally excited state to the relaxed state. Overall, the populating and depopulating processes due to the solvent relaxation lead to a contextual decrease of the fluorescence lifetime in the blue channel, and an increase of the measured lifetime in the green channel. Thus, the ratio between the blue and green apparent lifetimes

$$\eta ({x,y} )= \frac{{{\tau _{green}}({x,y} )}}{{{\tau _{blue}}({x,y} )}}$$
provides for a measure of the extent of the solvent relaxation. The rationale of using the ratio is to summarize a common effect due to solvent relaxation in the two channels: from previous studies [29,3133], as already explained upwards, the main effect of solvent relaxation is to increase the lifetime of the green channel and decrease concomitantly the lifetime of the blue channel. The ratio allows to reduce the extent of lifetime variations due to fluidity (which are already accounted by GP). Amplitudes are more strongly affected by fluidity variations. We added this explanation and this reference to justify this choice.

This parameter, independent from the probe concentration, uneven illumination, and other artefacts gives a further characterization of the membrane phase, thus providing information about its microviscosity. An increase in η$({x,y} )$Z indicates a slower spectral relaxation, which is related to slower motility of water molecules due to the formation of hydrogen bonds with a membrane phase that presents a high grade of structured water, increasing the microviscosity of the phase. In several works, an increase in structured water is linked to the presence of cholesterol [14,32,33]. The η value is calculated pixel-by-pixel using the equation [4] yielding the η-image, which serves as one of the inputs for the unsupervised analysis. Background values are measured and subtracted for each image, and debris or other aggregates are removed to avoid biases in the analysis.

2.6 Confocal microscopy of intracellular organelles

For the detection of intracellular organelles, petri dishes with GFP or Nile Red labeled cells are placed on the inverted confocal microscope (Nikon A1 MP) equipped with an on stage incubator (T = 37 °C, 5% CO2, OKOLAB) and a 32 channel spectral detector [21]. The 32 channel spectral images are obtained using a 60× objective (NA 1.4) under 488 nm excitation in the emission range 510-700 nm (6 nm bandwidth). Internal photon multiplier tubes collected 16 bit, 1024×1024-pixel images at 0.125 ms dwell time. To isolate intracellular organelles from the background an intensity-based segmentation is applied. For the intracellular GFP-stained organelles segmentation, the intensity image is integrated into the spectral range 510-520 nm. For the Nile Red labeled LD, the intensity image is integrated into the spectral range 534-557 nm. Organelles segmentation is obtained through the open-source software ImageJ (NIH) by applying the Max Entropy method (built-in function ‘Threshold’). Plasma membranes (PM) are isolated by applying the ‘Find Edges’ tool.

The quantification of the fraction of area covered by a specific organelle (central sections of the cells are sampled as reference) is evaluated as the ratio of the number of pixels covered by the organelle (N pixelORG) and the total number of pixels covered by the cell (N pixelCELL)

$$N\; (\%)= \frac{{N\; pixe{l_{\; ORG}}}}{{N\; pixe{l_{\; CELL}}}} \cdot 100$$
Because of the possibility of an overlap between the organelles (especially ER and Mitochondria), the values given in graph represent upper estimates.

2.7 Statistics

Statistical tests for sets of biological/biophysical data (Fig. 2(F), 2(G), 5(B), 7) are performed by R Studio (https://www.rstudio.com/). For image quantification, a minimum of n=40 cell per sample is analyzed. Baseline characteristics among groups have been compared with ANOVA for parametric variables. Quartile-quartile plots checked data normality graphically. A comparison between groups’ couples has been made with Tukey’s Test.

3. Results

3.1 Analysis of P maps, GP maps, and η maps of PC-12 cells

The pixel resolved parameters extracted from the hyperspectral lifetime acquisitions are visualized in the P maps, the GP maps and η maps, reflecting pixel-resolved differences in the partition coefficient of the probe within the phase, in the hydration levels and in the microviscosity of the phase, respectively. In Fig. 1(A)–1(B)–1(C), P maps, GP maps and η maps of a representative, untreatedPC-12 cell are reported. In Fig. 1(D)–1(E)–1(F) the spatial distributions of normalized intensity (contour plots generated with Image-J, NIH), GP and η values are visibly different since each quantity reflects a peculiar property of the membrane phase. P maps present peaks in correspondence of LD [25], which are resolved and display the highest P value (P=1, white regions), and an intermediate value (P∼0.5, yellow regions) in the intracellular regions different from LD. Based on its location and extent within the cell (Fig. 6), these internal regions correspond to ER membranes, mitochondrial membranes and the membrane of Golgi apparatus. Perinuclear and peri-PM regions display the lowest P values. The GP distribution (Fig. 1(E)) is more homogeneous in LD and in the regions around them. In the other intracellular regions, it is possible to observe subsets of pixels characterized by a flat spatial P distribution, but with a GP distribution dominated by a wrinkled landscape (Fig. 1(D) and 1(E), red arrows). The η spatial distribution (Fig. 1(F)) provides an additional informative content: the corrugated landscape is very different from the one characteristic of P and GP distributions, highlighting the presence of several membrane regions characterized by a range of diverse spectral relaxation values.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. P maps, GP maps and η maps of a representative untreated PC-12 cell. (A) P maps, (B) GP maps and (C) η maps of a representative PC-12 cell. (D) Spatial distributions of normalized intensity, GP (E) and η values (F) are visibly different since each quantity reflects a peculiar property of the membrane phase. Subsets of pixels characterized by a flat spatial intensity distribution, but with a GP distribution dominated by a wrinkled landscape are indicated by red arrows. Scale bar is 10 µm.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 P maps, GP maps, and η maps of PC-12 cells in glucose overload conditions

In Fig. 2(A)–2(B)–2(C) representative P Maps, GP Maps and η maps of PC-12 cells, respectively at 11 mM, 50 mM and 75 mM glucose are reported. The average variations of GP and η with increasing glucose concentration (averages of the image histograms over the entire dataset) are not significant (Fig. 2(F)–2(G)). However, from the GP histogram calculated for n=40 cells (Fig. 2(D)), a rearrangement of the membrane domains following the glucose treatment, consisting of a decrease of the high GP pixels (in the dark-green colored region around GP∼0.9, low hydration) and an increase of the low GP pixels (in the light-green colored region around GP∼0.5), can be seen. Concomitantly, a slight shift of the η distribution towards lower values can be observed (Fig. 2(E)).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. P maps, GP maps and η maps of PC-12 cells in glucose overload conditions. (A) P maps, (B) GP maps and (C) η maps of representative PC-12 cells at 11 mM, 50 mM and 75 mM glucose, respectively. (D) GP histogram and (E) η histogram calculated over the whole dataset (see section 2.6) show a subtle rearrangement of the membrane domains following the glucose treatment. (F) Average values of GP histograms at different glucose concentrations. (G) Average values of η histograms atdifferent glucose concentration. Scale bar is 20 µm.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.3 Artificial intelligence clustering of multiparametric fluorescent images

The separate analysis of the three maps, though indicating that some changes are occurring, lacks the specificity needed to fully describe the phases of intracellular membranes. To extend the spectrum of detectable membrane phases, we report in Fig. 3 the workflow for obtaining AI images. In the first step, multiparametric images are acquired with a hyperspectral imaging system. For each pixel, intensity values and lifetime values for the blue channel (400-470 nm) and green channel (490-600 nm) are obtained, for a total of 4 parameters. These parameters are further processed (Materials and Methods), adding additional information in the form of two factors: the G factor and the referenced normalization of intensity (Eq. (1) and Eq.3), transforming them in the P value, the GP value and the ratio η of the lifetimes. In the second step, images are stacked, creating a multiparametric map in which each pixel is associated with a real phase-vector $\vec{\varphi } = ({P,GP,\eta } )$. The parameters are then rescaled and the pixels of the entire dataset analyzed are sent to a k-means classifier. K-means clustering aims to partition the n observations into k (≤ n) sets S = {S1, S2, …, Sk} to minimize the within-cluster sum of squares (WCSS) (i.e. variance). The obtained cluster center is the representative of its cluster. The number of observations n corresponds to the total number of pixels analyzed (n=512 × 512*m, where m is the number of images).

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Workflow for the artificial intelligence clustering of multiparametric fluorescent images. In the first step, multiparametric images are acquired with a hyperspectral imaging system. For each pixel, the P value, the GP value, and the ratio η are measured to quantify the spectral properties of the solvatochromic probe. In the second step, images are stacked, creating a multiparametric map in which each pixel is associated with a 3D phase state-vector (P, GP, η). The dataset of phase state vectors is then sent to a k-means classifier. K-means clustering aims to partition n observations into k clusters in which each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean, serving as a prototype of the cluster. Each classified pixel is then remapped to the pseudo-image, that we called AI image. Phases are then ranked and pseudo-colored and the computed distribution of the phases is reported in the phase-profile graph.

Download Full Size | PDF

All the m images of the experiment (m∼ 15, resolution 512 × 512) are sent to the classifier. In each image from 6 to 10 cells are present. The k-means algorithm [34,35] represents each of the k clusters Cj by the mean (or weighted average) cj of its points (centroid). The sum of distances between elements of a set of points and its centroid expressed through an appropriate distance function is used as the objective function. We employed the L2 norm-based objective function, i.e. the sum of the squares of errors between the points and the corresponding centroids, which is equal to the total intracluster variance

$$E(C )= \mathop \sum \nolimits_{j = 1:k} \mathop \sum \nolimits_{{x_i}\epsilon {C_j}} \vert\vert{x_i} - {C_j}\vert\vert^2$$
k-means iterative optimization consists of two-step major iterations that: (1) reassign all the points to their nearest centroids, and (2) recompute centroids of newly assembled groups. Iterations continue until a stopping criterion is achieved (no reassignments with tolerance <10−5). This version, known as Forgy’s algorithm [35] works with any Lp norm and it does not depend on data ordering. The k-means algorithm also has certain shortcomings which are minimized or mitigated according to the following:
  • 1) Dependence from the initial guess of centroids: To mitigate the effects of cluster initialization we applied the method suggested by Bradley and Fayyad [36]. First, we performed k-means on several small samples of data with a random initial guess. Each of these constructed systems is then used as a potential initialization for a union of all the samples. Centroids of the best system constructed this way are suggested as an intelligent initial guess to ignite the k-means algorithm on the full data.
  • 2) Computation of local minima: No initialization guarantees a global minimum for k-means. This is a general problem in combinatorial optimization, which was tackled by allowing uphill movements and determines the global minimum of a given set of n-dimension functions with constraints using simulated annealing (SA) method [37].
  • 3) Problem of k-selection: The optimal number of clusters (k=8) is determined by the elbow method and validated with the Silhouette method (Fig. 4). The elbow method consists in the determination of the within-cluster-sum of squared errors (WSS) for different values of k, and in the selection of the k value for which WSS becomes first starts to diminish. In the plot of WSS-versus-k, this is visible as an elbow (Fig. 4). Silhouette is a method to validate consistency within clusters of data. The silhouette value is a measure of how similar an object is to its cluster compared to other clusters. The silhouette ranges from −1 to +1, where a high value indicates that the object is well matched to its cluster and poorly matched to neighboring clusters. The silhouette plot displays a local maximum at the chosen k=6 and has an average Silhouette value of 0.88 (Fig. 4).
  • 4) Sensitivity to outliers: The parameters are rescaled using as an offset the mean value of the distribution, and as scaling factor αs, where s is the standard deviation of the distribution and α a tunable parameter. If the distributions are almost Gaussians, α >3 ensures that more than 99% of the values are considered. This was verified by visual inspection and qq-plots. When there are significant deviations from Gaussians the α factor is adjusted to include at least 99% of values by direct calculation.

Once the optimization is performed, each pixel is classified in 8 classes, with value going from 1 to 8, and then remapped to the pseudo-image, that we called AI image. Phases are ranked according to the $\vert\vert\vec{\varphi }\vert\vert$ value. The distribution of phases is calculated by reporting the fraction of pixels belonging to each class k.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Elbow plot and Silhouette plot for the determination of the optimal cluster number of PC-12 cells treated with increasing glucose concentration.

Download Full Size | PDF

We selected P, GP and eta as input parameters because they provide a referenced and thus comparable measure of probe concentration (P) and phase shift (GP) among different samples, from experiment to experiment, and from lab to lab. Using these data, instead of the raw data, adds additional information in the form of two factors: the G factor (Eq. (3)) and the referenced normalization of intensity (Eq. (1)). Eta is intrinsically independent from these detrimental fluctuations, and it was introduced to summarize a common effect due to solvent relaxation in the two channels: in several studies [29,3133], it is clear that the effect of solvent relaxation is to increase the lifetime of the green channel and decrease concomitantly the lifetime of the blue channel. This ratio allows to reduce the extent of lifetime variations due to fluidity (which are already accounted by GP). The usage of processed data allows also employing in k-means clustering three parameters instead of four, thus reducing the number of parameters employed in the model (if the number of dimensions (n) increases to four, with k=8 cluster the number of free parameters (equal to n×k) will increase from 24 to 32).

Keeping all the settings fixed, the usage of raw data shows a convergence of the algorithms nearly on the same clusters, but the 4p clustering is less optimal than the 3p clustering (Silhouette value=0.81). Therefore, we conclude that our approach based on processed quantities has to be preferred, allowing comparison on the same clusters of results coming from different experimental settings, different labs, different days, long acquisition times. Moreover, the maximum Silhouette value denotes an overall reduction of noise: while noise can be added in retrieving indirect quantities, the increase of specificity of these parameters and the removal of noise related to intensity fluctuations and other spurious fluctuations can lead to optimization of data clustering.

3.4 AI images of PC-12 cells undergoing glucose overload and characterization of the phase profiles

In Fig. 5(A), AI images, obtained as described in the previous section, are reported. The retrieved phases are labeled by a number going from 1 to 8. In Fig. 5(B), the average fraction of the phase is reported. Each class is characterized by the mean values of (P, GP, η) calculated on the respective clusters. These values are shown in Fig. 5(C), ranked in four classes (white = fourth quartile-lowest values, light blue = third quartile, blue = second quartile, dark blue = first quartile-highest values). While clusters 1 and 2 correspond to background values (BK1-BK2), class 3 (P, GP, η) =(Q3-Q3-Q3) represents a fluid phase with low viscosity and low permeability. This phase is localized on the cell PM, the fraction occupied is ∼5% and it is organized in macro-domains. Since fluidity and low viscosity are characteristic of the liquid-disordered phase [2,3], we label this phase as $l_d^{PM}$. Class 4 (Q3-Q4-Q1) represents a hyper-fluid, hyper-viscous phase with low permeability. Also, this phase is mainly localized on the cell PM, organized in macro-domains, with an occupied fraction ∼5%. Since hyper-viscosity is characteristic of the liquid-ordered phase [29,32], we define phase 4 as $l_o^{PM}$phase. The sum of the area fractions occupied by the two phases is coherent with the area fraction occupied by PM (§3.5 and Fig. 67). Class 5 (Q2-Q3-Q2) represents a fluid and viscous phase, with intermediate permeability, localized in the inner part of the cell. This phase is organized as a region formed by a limited number of connected blocks with a networked structure and represents the larger fraction of the cell (Fig. 4(B)). In §3.5 and Fig. 67 a comparison with the spatial distribution of the major intracellular organelles of PC-12 cells labeled with ER-GFP, Golgi-GFP and Mitochondria-GFP constructs and Nile Red is reported. The spatial organization and the area fraction covered by this phase indicates that it is characteristic of some portions of ER, the Golgi and the mitochondrial network. The phase has the same fluidity of the liquid-disordered phase [2,3] but has a higher viscosity. Thus it is defined as $l_d^{NET}$. Class 6 (Q2-Q2-Q1) represents probe-permeable, rigid, hyper-viscous domains. These membranes constitute a network of spread structures, which are less connected than class 5. Class 6 may constitute another phase of the above-mentioned networked structure, which includes vesicular membranes like endosomes and synaptic vesicles (Fig. 6). Apart from the different morphology which comes out from k-means analysis, further investigation is required to understand exactly which organelles take part to class 5 or class 6. This is not a straightforward since our technique requires the exploitation of a wide portion of the visible spectrum making it difficult to separate the fluorescence contributes. The hyper-viscosity of this phase is characteristic of the liquid-ordered phase, thus we define this phase as $l_o^{NET}$. Differently from $l_o^{PM}$, this phase is less hydrated, thus indicating a higher lipid packing. Class 7 represents hyper-permeable, hyper-rigid, viscous domains (Q1-Q1-Q2). This class is contiguous to class 5 and class 8 (LD). Therefore, this region can be localized in the ER, in correspondence of the LD formation sites. These quantities are characteristic of the gel-like phase; thus, we define this phase as $s_o^{ER}$. Though this phase was recognized by the k-means clustering as an independent phase, at the moment is it not possible to confirm the direct colocalization of these sites, for the same reason as above. Finally, class 8 (Q1-Q1-Q3) represents hyper permeable, hyper-rigid, low viscosity domains. This class is localized in LD (Fig. 6), as shown in Fig. S1 (Supplement 1). Since these quantities are characteristic of the gel-like phase [2,3], we call this phase $s_o^{LD}$. Glucose treatment causes an increase in the extent of phase 5 (80%) at the expenses of phases 6 and 7 (Fig. 5(A)-B). Thus, glucose overload induces a major transitions $l_o^{NET}$ $l_d^{NET}$ along with a minor transition $s_o^{ER}$$\; l_d^{NET}\; $Z.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. AI images of cell membrane phases. (A) AI images of PC-12 cells treated with increasing glucose concentrations and phase profiles. Retrieved classes are labeled with a number in the range 1 - 8. Class 1 (black) and 2 (red) represent background clusters. Class 3 (green) represents the liquid-disordered phase of PM, $l_d^{PM}$. Class 4 (blue) represents the liquid-ordered phase of PM, $l_o^{PM}$. Class 5 (light blue) represents the liquid-disordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_d^{NET}$. Class 6 (violet) represent the liquid-ordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_o^{NET}$. Class 7 (yellow) represents the solid-ordered phase of the ER, $s_o^{ER}$. Class 8 (white) represents the solid-ordered phase of the LD, $s_o^{LD}$. (B) Phase profile of PC-12 cells treated with increasing glucose concentration (11-50-75 mM). Statistical analysis: ANOVA for parametric variables (* stands for p<0.05; ** stands for p<0.01). (C) Phase characterization by the mean values of (P, GP, η) calculated on the respective clusters. These values are ranked in four classes (white = fourth quartile-lowest values, light blue = third quartile, blue = second quartile, dark blue = first quartile-highest values). 15 images are sent to the classifier. In each image from 6 to 10 cells are present. The values represent quantities calculated on these images. Scale bar is 20 µm.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. AI images of control PC-12 cells and comparison with the spatial distribution of the major intracellular organelles with AI images In AI images, (black) and 2 (red) represent background cluster; green pixels represent the liquid-disordered phase of PM, $l_d^{PM}$; blue pixels represent the liquid-ordered phase of PM, $l_o^{PM}$; light blue pixels represents the liquid-disordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_d^{NET}$; violet pixels represent the liquid-ordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_o^{NET}$; yellow pixels represent the solid-ordered phase of the ER, $s_o^{ER}$; white pixels represent the solid-ordered phase of the LD, $s_o^{LD}$. In the organelle images (LD: Lipid droplet, LDs; Golgi: Golgi apparatus; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Mito: Mitochondria; PM: plasma membrane), the red pixels belong to the organelles, the green pixels represent the cell area. Scale bar is 20 µm.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. Organelle Area fraction of PC-12 Cells.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.5 Spatial distribution and organelle area fraction of PC-12 cells

In Fig. 6, AI images for control PC-12 cells and a comparison with the spatial distribution of the major intracellular organelles are reported. The organelles are labeled with organelle-GFP constructs as indicated in Materials and Methods. NGF-treated PC-12 cells present a polarized, elongated shape along a major axis.

$l_d^{PM}$ and $l_o^{PM}$ are localized on PM, covering ∼ (11 ± 3)% of the total cell area (Fig. 5(B)). The area of the PM is about (15 ± 3)% consistent (within 2σ) with the value retrieved for the phase area fraction (Fig. 7).

The phases $l_d^{NET}\; $and $l_o^{NET}$ and $s_o^{ER}$ cover ∼ (76 ± 12)% of the area fraction (Fig. 5(B)). This value is consistent with the area fraction occupied by Golgi, ER and Mitochondria and other organelles (73 ± 10)% (Fig. 7). The spatial distribution of the phases is constituted by less connected and more connected, scattered domains, as one of the organelles. $s_o^{LD}$ phase presents the same spatial distribution of LD labeled with Nile Red. This spatial distribution is characterized by a limited number of perinuclear connected regions consisting of LD clusters which are localized along the major axis of the cell. The average organelle area fraction of LD (12 ± 3)% (Fig. 7) is consistent (within 2σ) with the value retrieved for the phase area fraction (7 ± 3)% (Fig. 5(B)). This value slightly deviates systemically because $s_o^{LD}$ labels only the core of LD, while the external layer consists mainly of phase $s_o^{ER}$.

4 Discussion

In this work, we introduced an artificial intelligence clustering tool that leverages the multiparametric content of spectrally resolved lifetime images, resulting in an extension of the spectrum of detectable membrane phases. This method allows to reveal the phase organization inside PC-12 cell, dissecting and characterizing up to six different phases, with pixel resolution, and to study in real-time phase separations induced by different treatments. We found that PM of PC-12 cell is divided into two principal phases: a liquid-disordered phase $l_d^{PM}$(class 3) and a hyper-fluid, hyper-viscous, liquid-disordered phase $l_o^{PM}$(class 4). The developed method enabled the imaging of liquid-ordered domains of $l_o^{PM}$, which are characterized by a higher cholesterol concentration [32,33]. The liquid-ordered phase induced by the presence of cholesterol in the membranes has intermediate physical properties between so and ld. While it increases the fluidity in high packed membranes, as the ones composed by saturated fatty acid tails, cholesterol brings order in highly fluid domains [38]. The imaging of liquid-ordered domains, which are characterized by a higher cholesterol content, though possible with a visual inspection of the traditional analysis and comparison of the several parametric images (Fig. 2(A)), cannot distinguish with enough specificity these two different phases in which a deep restructuration of lipid domains induced by cholesterol is present. We point out that the phase scenario of a PM is more complex and a more specific clustering, especially with the aid of Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence microscopy (TIRF) or Supercritical Angle Fluorescence (SAF) techniques, can in principle be achieved with the presented analysis method. The inner part of the cell is divided into four different phases: the first is a liquid-disordered phase $l_d^{NET}$ (class 5) which is characteristic of intracellular connected regions with a networked structure, with the same fluidity of the liquid-disordered phase [2,3], but with a higher viscosity, which can be functional to the three-dimensional organization of these structures [38]. The spatial organization and the area fraction covered by this phase indicates that it is peculiar to some portions of ER, Golgi and the mitochondrial network membranes. This finding is supported by recent research, showing that ER and mitochondria cannot be considered as individual organelles in the cell, as they are structurally and functionally linked through contact points defined as mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) [3943]. The first described function of ER-mitochondria contact sites is the exchange of phospholipids between organelles [44], thus facilitating their phase homogenization. This interconnected family of organelles can undergo a transition towards a liquid-ordered phase $l_o^{NET}$ (class 6). Differently from $l_o^{PM}$, this phase is less hydrated thus indicating a higher packing. Its hyper-viscosity indicates the presence of cholesterol or a peculiar membrane protein organization, which can eventually favor the formation of more scattered vesicular membranes, like endosomes and synaptic-like vesicles. These isolated structures can account for the observed fragmented distribution of this phase. Then, the unsupervised learning of hyperspectral information detected a phase at ER sites surrounding LD (phase $s_o^{LD}$, class 8). This phase may be characteristic of LD formation sites (phase$\; s_o^{ER}$, class 7), that are specialized ER sites in which LD formation occurs, whose presence is supported by evidence in both yeast and mammalian cells [45]. Proteins involved in triacylglycerol synthesis are enriched at these sites within the ER, suggesting that neutral lipids could be synthesized at these discrete zones and that these platforms can help the clustering of specific domains allowing the LD budding-off. The sites retrieved by this method reveal that their phase is highly non-polar (phase$\; s_o^{ER}$), thus enriched in triglycerides [20]. The distribution and the fraction of LD formation sites can, therefore, be revealed, providing insights in alterations of the activation of lipid storage and lipolysis pathways like the one we found, following glucose overload, on PC-12 cells, a well-established model to monitor the effects of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetic neuropathy is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes [46], and hyperglycemia has a relevant role in its development [47], inducing oxidative stress, apoptosis, and dysfunctions in neurons [48], glycation [49], the lack of neurotrophins and proinflammatory processes [50,51]. We observed that glucose treatment triggers a main transition $l_o^{NET}$ $l_d^{NET}$ and a minor transition $s_o^{ER}$$\; l_d^{NET}\; $Z. The main transition indicates a decrease of the less connected, vesicular phase inside cells. Since these vesicles originate mostly from the ER, this transition could be an early indication of the reduction of vesicle biogenesis rate. The alteration of these membrane phases leads to a visible rearrangement of the inner organelles, both in shape and dimensions, which can play an important role in affecting calcium homeostasis and signaling and in altering the pattern of neurotransmitter release [52,53], by impairing vesicle fusion and impedance of the membrane. This transition can also be linked to the high glucose level-induced disruption of MAM integrity and function through the activation of the pentose phosphate-PP2A pathway [54]. Indeed, MAM plays a crucial role in organelles biogenesis, being the site of autophagosome formation [55]. The second transition reveals a reduction of the LD formation sites, indicating the trigger of a metabolic switch turning off LD formation, though the number of LD stays nearly constant. The biological interpretation of these transitions, though needing further morphological and functional investigation, underlines the role of membrane phase remodeling in organelles biogenesis, and cannot be provided by contextual examination of the single parameter images (Fig. 2). A limitation of this technique is the requirement of a complex experimental setup (time resolved spectral detectors, two –photon laser). Moreover, because this technique requires the exploitation of a wide portion of the visible spectrum, it is difficult to perform co-labeling experiments and separate fluorescence contributes. A setup exploiting detection of far-red/infrared probes could in principle overcome this limit. Also spatial resolution can constitute a limit, especially when dealing with phase boundaries. With respect to TIRF and SAF microscopy for studying membrane dynamics [56], this technique lacks the selectivity for studying plasma membrane dynamics and phase transition. An advantage, however, is that it provides the possibility to analyze and dissect phase transitions for inner membranes.

The artificial intelligence clustering of multiparametric fluorescent images, by extending the spectrum of detectable cell membrane phases with the sub-micrometric resolution, opens the possibility to deeply investigate organelles biogenesis, a central focus of cell biology, and enables contextual insights on membrane remodeling and lipid metabolism. The real-time visualization of the biophysical alterations, by fully exploiting the information content of the photons emitted by solvatochromic probes, provides for a deeper understanding of the mechanisms linking the supramolecular emergent properties to cell functions.

Funding

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (D1 2018 grant number R4124500391); European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes (EFSD/SANOFI 2018).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Mario Amici for his excellent technical support. The authors acknowledge the Cost Action CA15124 “NEUBIAS” for supporting training in image processing and analysis of GB.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

See Supplement 1 for supporting content.

References

1. G. Maulucci, O. Cohen, B. Daniel, A. Sansone, P. I. Petropoulou, S. Filou, A. Spyridonidis, G. Pani, M. De Spirito, C. Chatgilialoglu, C. Ferreri, K. E. Kypreos, and S. Sasson, “Fatty acid-related modulations of membranes fluidity in cells: detection and implications,” Free Radic. Res. 50(sup1), S40–S50 (2016). [CrossRef]  

2. D. Marsh, Handbook of Lipid Bilayers, second (CRC Press, 2013).

3. G. van Meer, D. R. Voelker, and G. W. Feigenson, “Membrane lipids: where they are and how they behave,” Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9(2), 112–124 (2008). [CrossRef]  

4. C. Angelucci, G. Maulucci, G. Lama, G. Proietti, A. Colabianchi, M. Papi, A. Maiorana, M. De Spirito, A. Micera, O. B. Balzamino, A. Di Leone, R. Masetti, and G. Sica, “Epithelial-stromal interactions in human breast cancer: effects on adhesion, plasma membrane fluidity and migration speed and directness,” PLoS One 7(12), e50804 (2012). [CrossRef]  

5. G. Balogh, G. Maulucci, I. Gombos, I. Horváth, Z. Török, M. Péter, E. Fodor, T. Páli, S. Benko, T. Parasassi, M. de Spirito, J. L. J. L. Harwood, L. Vígh, S. Benkő, T. Parasassi, M. de Spirito, J. L. J. L. Harwood, and L. Vígh, “Heat stress causes spatially-distinct membrane re-modelling in K562 leukemia cells,” PLoS One 6(6), e21182 (2011). [CrossRef]  

6. G. Maulucci, D. Troiani, S. L. M. Eramo, F. Paciello, M. V. Podda, G. Paludetti, M. Papi, A. Maiorana, V. Palmieri, M. De Spirito, and A. R. Fetoni, “Time evolution of noise induced oxidation in outer hair cells: Role of NAD(P)H and plasma membrane fluidity,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Gen. Subj. 1840(7), 2192–2202 (2014). [CrossRef]  

7. G. Maulucci, E. Cordelli, A. Rizzi, F. De Leva, M. Papi, G. Ciasca, D. Samengo, G. Pani, D. Pitocco, P. Soda, G. Ghirlanda, G. Iannello, and M. De Spirito, “Phase separation of the plasma membrane in human red blood cells as a potential tool for diagnosis and progression monitoring of type 1 diabetes mellitus,” PLoS One 12(9), e0184109 (2017). [CrossRef]  

8. C. de la Haba, J. R. Palacio, P. Martínez, and A. Morros, “Effect of oxidative stress on plasma membrane fluidity of THP-1 induced macrophages,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1828(2), 357–364 (2013). [CrossRef]  

9. L. Mazzanti, E. Faloia, R. A. Rabini, R. Staffolani, A. Kantar, R. Fiorini, B. Swoboda, R. de Pirro, and E. Bertoli, “Diabetes mellitus induces red blood cell plasma membrane alterations possibly affecting the aging process,” Clin. Biochem. 25(1), 41–46 (1992). [CrossRef]  

10. P. Greenspan, E. P. Mayer, and S. D. Fowler, “Nile red: a selective fluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets,” J. Cell Biol. 100(3), 965–973 (1985). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Crociati, F. Di Giacinto, E. Manuali, G. Stradaioli, L. Sylla, M. Monaci, G. Maulucci, and M. De Spirito, “Systemic profiling of ectopic fat deposits in the reproductive tract of dairy cows,” Theriogenology 114, 46–53 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. F. Di Giacinto, M. De Spirito, and G. Maulucci, “Low-Intensity Ultrasound Induces Thermodynamic Phase Separation of Cell Membranes through a Nucleation–Condensation Process,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45(5), 1143–1150 (2019). [CrossRef]  

13. P. Weber, M. Wagner, and H. Schneckenburger, “Fluorescence imaging of membrane dynamics in living cells,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(4), 046017 (2010). [CrossRef]  

14. L. Malacrida, D. M. Jameson, and E. Gratton, “A multidimensional phasor approach reveals LAURDAN photophysics in NIH-3T3 cell membranes,” Sci. Rep. 7(1), 9215 (2017). [CrossRef]  

15. G. Maulucci, G. Bačić, L. Bridal, H. H. H. W. Schmidt, B. Tavitian, T. Viel, H. Utsumi, A. S. Yalçin, and M. De Spirito, “Imaging Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced Modifications in Living Systems,” Antioxidants Redox Signal. 24(16), 939–958 (2016). [CrossRef]  

16. G. Maulucci, G. Pani, V. Labate, M. Mele, E. Panieri, M. Papi, G. Arcovito, T. Galeotti, and M. De Spirito, “Investigation of the spatial distribution of glutathione redox-balance in live cells by using Fluorescence Ratio Imaging Microscopy,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 25(4), 682–687 (2009). [CrossRef]  

17. G. Maulucci, V. Labate, M. Mele, E. Panieri, G. Arcovito, T. Galeotti, H. Østergaard, J. R. J. R. Winther, M. De Spirito, and G. Pani, “High-resolution imaging of redox signaling in live cells through an oxidation-sensitive yellow fluorescent protein,” Sci. Signal. 1(43), pl3 (2008). [CrossRef]  

18. S. Sameni, L. Malacrida, Z. Tan, and M. A. Digman, “Alteration in Fluidity of Cell Plasma Membrane in Huntington Disease Revealed by Spectral Phasor Analysis,” Sci. Rep. 8(1), 734 (2018). [CrossRef]  

19. L. A. Bagatolli and E. Gratton, “Two photon fluorescence microscopy of coexisting lipid domains in giant unilamellar vesicles of binary phospholipid mixtures,” Biophys. J. 78(1), 290–305 (2000). [CrossRef]  

20. G. Maulucci, F. Di Giacinto, C. De Angelis, O. Cohen, B. Daniel, C. Ferreri, M. De Spirito, and S. Sasson, “Real time quantitative analysis of lipid storage and lipolysis pathways by confocal spectral imaging of intracellular micropolarity,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1863(7), 783–793 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. F. Di Giacinto, C. De Angelis, M. De Spirito, and G. Maulucci, “Quantitative imaging of membrane micropolarity in living cells and tissues by spectral phasors analysis,” MethodsX 5, 1399–1412 (2018). [CrossRef]  

22. B. P. Yakimov, M. A. Gogoleva, A. N. Semenov, S. A. Rodionov, M. V. Novoselova, A. V. Gayer, A. V. Kovalev, A. I. Bernakevich, V. V. Fadeev, A. G. Armaganov, V. P. Drachev, D. A. Gorin, M. E. Darvin, V. I. Shcheslavskiy, G. S. Budylin, A. V. Priezzhev, and E. A. Shirshin, “Label-free characterization of white blood cells using fluorescence lifetime imaging and flow-cytometry: molecular heterogeneity and erythrophagocytosis [Invited],” Biomed. Opt. Express 10(8), 4220 (2019). [CrossRef]  

23. Y. Zhang, T. Hato, P. C. Dagher, E. L. Nichols, C. J. Smith, K. W. Dunn, and S. S. Howard, “Automatic segmentation of intravital fluorescence microscopy images by K-means clustering of FLIM phasors,” Opt. Lett. 44(16), 3928 (2019). [CrossRef]  

24. M. Chen, H. Zheng, T. Wei, D. Wang, H. Xia, L. Zhao, J. Ji, and H. Gao, “High Glucose-Induced PC12 Cell Death by Increasing Glutamate Production and Decreasing Methyl Group Metabolism,” Biomed Res. Int. 2016, 1–9 (2016). [CrossRef]  

25. R. Scanferlato, M. Bortolotti, A. Sansone, C. Chatgilialoglu, L. Polito, M. De Spirito, G. Maulucci, A. Bolognesi, and C. Ferreri, “Hexadecenoic Fatty Acid Positional Isomers and De Novo PUFA Synthesis in Colon Cancer Cells,” Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(4), 832 (2019). [CrossRef]  

26. L. A. Bagatolli, T. Parasassi, G. D. Fidelio, and E. Gratton, “A model for the interaction of 6-lauroyl-2-(N,N-dimethylamino)naphthalene with lipid environments: implications for spectral properties,” Photochem. Photobiol. 70(4), 557–564 (1999). [CrossRef]  

27. G. Maulucci, D. Troiani, S. L. M. S. L. M. Eramo, F. Paciello, M. V. M. V. Podda, G. Paludetti, M. Papi, A. Maiorana, V. Palmieri, M. De Spirito, and A. R. A. R. Fetoni, “Time evolution of noise induced oxidation in outer hair cells: Role of NAD(P)H and plasma membrane fluidity,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1840(7), 2192–2202 (2014). [CrossRef]  

28. K. Gaus, T. Zech, and T. Harder, “Visualizing membrane microdomains by Laurdan 2-photon microscopy,” Mol. Membr. Biol. 23(1), 41–48 (2006). [CrossRef]  

29. Y. Ma, A. Benda, J. Kwiatek, D. M. Owen, and K. Gaus, “Time-Resolved Laurdan Fluorescence Reveals Insights into Membrane Viscosity and Hydration Levels,” Biophys. J. 115(8), 1498–1508 (2018). [CrossRef]  

30. R. W. K. Leung, S.-C. A. Yeh, and Q. Fang, “Effects of incomplete decay in fluorescence lifetime estimation,” Biomed. Opt. Express 2(9), 2517 (2011). [CrossRef]  

31. J. R. Lakowicz, Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy (Springer, 2006).

32. O. Golfetto, E. Hinde, and E. Gratton, “Laurdan fluorescence lifetime discriminates cholesterol content from changes in fluidity in living cell membranes,” Biophys. J. 104(6), 1238–1247 (2013). [CrossRef]  

33. G. Bianchetti, F. Di Giacinto, D. Pitocco, A. Rizzi, G. E. Rizzo, F. De Leva, A. Flex, E. di Stasio, G. Ciasca, M. De Spirito, and G. Maulucci, “Red blood cells membrane micropolarity as a novel diagnostic indicator of type 1 and type 2 diabetes,” Anal. Chim. Acta X 3, 100030 (2019). [CrossRef]  

34. J. A. Hartigan and M. A. Wong, “Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm,” Appl. Stat. 28(1), 100 (1979). [CrossRef]  

35. J. Kogan, C. Nicholas, and M. Teboulle, Grouping Multidimensional Data: Recent Advances in Clustering (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2006).

36. “ICML ‘98: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning,” in (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1998).

37. G. T. Perim, E. D. Wandekokem, and F. M. Varejão, “K-means initialization methods for improving clustering by simulated annealing,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008), 5290 LNAI, pp. 133–142.

38. O. G. Mouritsen, Life — As a Matter of Fat, The Frontiers Collection (Springer-Verlag, 2005), 58(12).

39. J. Rieusset, “The role of endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria contact sites in the control of glucose homeostasis: An update,” Cell Death Dis. 9(3), 388 (2018). [CrossRef]  

40. S. Marchi, S. Patergnani, and P. Pinton, “The endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria connection: One touch, multiple functions,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Bioenerg. 1837(4), 461–469 (2014). [CrossRef]  

41. R. Filadi, P. Theurey, and P. Pizzo, “The endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling in health and disease: Molecules, functions and significance,” Cell Calcium 62, 1–15 (2017). [CrossRef]  

42. A. R. van Vliet, T. Verfaillie, and P. Agostinis, “New functions of mitochondria associated membranes in cellular signaling,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Res. 1843(10), 2253–2262 (2014). [CrossRef]  

43. E. Tubbs, P. Theurey, G. Vial, N. Bendridi, A. Bravard, M. A. Chauvin, J. Ji-Cao, F. Zoulim, B. Bartosch, M. Ovize, H. Vidal, and J. Rieusset, “Mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membrane (MAM) integrity is required for insulin signaling and is implicated in hepatic insulin resistance,” Diabetes 63(10), 3279–3294 (2014). [CrossRef]  

44. J. E. Vance, “Phospholipid synthesis in a membrane fraction associated with mitochondria,” J. Biol. Chem. 265(13), 7248–7256 (1990).

45. C. Thiele and J. Spandl, “Cell biology of lipid droplets,” Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20(4), 378–385 (2008). [CrossRef]  

46. E. Søfteland, C. Brock, J. B. Frøkjær, J. Brøgger, L. Madácsy, O. H. Gilja, L. Arendt-Nielsen, M. Simrén, A. M. Drewes, and G. Dimcevski, “Association between visceral, cardiac and sensorimotor polyneuropathies in diabetes mellitus,” J. Diabetes Complications 28(3), 370–377 (2014). [CrossRef]  

47. M. Katagi, T. Terashima, J. Okano, H. Urabe, Y. Nakae, N. Ogawa, J. Udagawa, H. Maegawa, K. Matsumura, L. Chan, and H. Kojima, “Hyperglycemia induces abnormal gene expression in hematopoietic stem cells and their progeny in diabetic neuropathy,” FEBS Lett. 588(6), 1080–1086 (2014). [CrossRef]  

48. P. Kumar, T. Raman, M. M. Swain, R. Mishra, and A. Pal, “Hyperglycemia-Induced Oxidative-Nitrosative Stress Induces Inflammation and Neurodegeneration via Augmented Tuberous Sclerosis Complex-2 (TSC-2) Activation in Neuronal Cells,” Mol. Neurobiol. 54(1), 238–254 (2017). [CrossRef]  

49. P. J. Thornalley, “Glycation in diabetic neuropathy: characteristics, consequences, causes, and therapeutic options,” Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 50, 37–57 (2002). [CrossRef]  

50. V. Ganesh Yerra, G. Negi, S. S. Sharma, and A. Kumar, “Potential therapeutic effects of the simultaneous targeting of the Nrf2 and NF-κB pathways in diabetic neuropathy,” Redox Biol. 1(1), 394–397 (2013). [CrossRef]  

51. M. Nazıroğlu, D. M. Dikici, and Ş. Dursun, “Role of Oxidative Stress and Ca2+ Signaling on Molecular Pathways of Neuropathic Pain in Diabetes: Focus on TRP Channels,” Neurochem. Res. 37(10), 2065–2075 (2012). [CrossRef]  

52. B. Lacoste, C. H. Comin, A. Ben-Zvi, P. S. Kaeser, X. Xu, L. da F. Costa, and C. Gu, “Sensory-Related Neural Activity Regulates the Structure of Vascular Networks in the Cerebral Cortex,” Neuron 83(5), 1117–1130 (2014). [CrossRef]  

53. I. G. Obrosova, “Diabetes and the peripheral nerve,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Basis Dis. 1792(10), 931–940 (2009).

54. P. Theurey, E. Tubbs, G. Vial, J. Jacquemetton, N. Bendridi, M. A. Chauvin, M. R. Alam, M. Le Romancer, H. Vidal, and J. Rieusset, “Mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes allow adaptation of mitochondrial metabolism to glucose availability in the liver,” J. Mol. Cell Biol. 8(2), 129–143 (2016). [CrossRef]  

55. M. Hamasaki, N. Furuta, A. Matsuda, A. Nezu, A. Yamamoto, N. Fujita, H. Oomori, T. Noda, T. Haraguchi, Y. Hiraoka, A. Amano, and T. Yoshimori, “Autophagosomes form at ER-mitochondria contact sites,” Nature 495(7441), 389–393 (2013). [CrossRef]  

56. A. J. García-Sáez and P. Schwille, “Surface analysis of membrane dynamics,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1798(4), 766–776 (2010). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Supplement 1       supplementary materials and methods

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. P maps, GP maps and η maps of a representative untreated PC-12 cell. (A) P maps, (B) GP maps and (C) η maps of a representative PC-12 cell. (D) Spatial distributions of normalized intensity, GP (E) and η values (F) are visibly different since each quantity reflects a peculiar property of the membrane phase. Subsets of pixels characterized by a flat spatial intensity distribution, but with a GP distribution dominated by a wrinkled landscape are indicated by red arrows. Scale bar is 10 µm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. P maps, GP maps and η maps of PC-12 cells in glucose overload conditions. (A) P maps, (B) GP maps and (C) η maps of representative PC-12 cells at 11 mM, 50 mM and 75 mM glucose, respectively. (D) GP histogram and (E) η histogram calculated over the whole dataset (see section 2.6) show a subtle rearrangement of the membrane domains following the glucose treatment. (F) Average values of GP histograms at different glucose concentrations. (G) Average values of η histograms atdifferent glucose concentration. Scale bar is 20 µm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Workflow for the artificial intelligence clustering of multiparametric fluorescent images. In the first step, multiparametric images are acquired with a hyperspectral imaging system. For each pixel, the P value, the GP value, and the ratio η are measured to quantify the spectral properties of the solvatochromic probe. In the second step, images are stacked, creating a multiparametric map in which each pixel is associated with a 3D phase state-vector (P, GP, η). The dataset of phase state vectors is then sent to a k-means classifier. K-means clustering aims to partition n observations into k clusters in which each observation belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean, serving as a prototype of the cluster. Each classified pixel is then remapped to the pseudo-image, that we called AI image. Phases are then ranked and pseudo-colored and the computed distribution of the phases is reported in the phase-profile graph.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Elbow plot and Silhouette plot for the determination of the optimal cluster number of PC-12 cells treated with increasing glucose concentration.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. AI images of cell membrane phases. (A) AI images of PC-12 cells treated with increasing glucose concentrations and phase profiles. Retrieved classes are labeled with a number in the range 1 - 8. Class 1 (black) and 2 (red) represent background clusters. Class 3 (green) represents the liquid-disordered phase of PM, $l_d^{PM}$. Class 4 (blue) represents the liquid-ordered phase of PM, $l_o^{PM}$. Class 5 (light blue) represents the liquid-disordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_d^{NET}$. Class 6 (violet) represent the liquid-ordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_o^{NET}$. Class 7 (yellow) represents the solid-ordered phase of the ER, $s_o^{ER}$. Class 8 (white) represents the solid-ordered phase of the LD, $s_o^{LD}$. (B) Phase profile of PC-12 cells treated with increasing glucose concentration (11-50-75 mM). Statistical analysis: ANOVA for parametric variables (* stands for p<0.05; ** stands for p<0.01). (C) Phase characterization by the mean values of (P, GP, η) calculated on the respective clusters. These values are ranked in four classes (white = fourth quartile-lowest values, light blue = third quartile, blue = second quartile, dark blue = first quartile-highest values). 15 images are sent to the classifier. In each image from 6 to 10 cells are present. The values represent quantities calculated on these images. Scale bar is 20 µm.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. AI images of control PC-12 cells and comparison with the spatial distribution of the major intracellular organelles with AI images In AI images, (black) and 2 (red) represent background cluster; green pixels represent the liquid-disordered phase of PM, $l_d^{PM}$; blue pixels represent the liquid-ordered phase of PM, $l_o^{PM}$; light blue pixels represents the liquid-disordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_d^{NET}$; violet pixels represent the liquid-ordered phase of the network of intracellular organelles, $l_o^{NET}$; yellow pixels represent the solid-ordered phase of the ER, $s_o^{ER}$; white pixels represent the solid-ordered phase of the LD, $s_o^{LD}$. In the organelle images (LD: Lipid droplet, LDs; Golgi: Golgi apparatus; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; Mito: Mitochondria; PM: plasma membrane), the red pixels belong to the organelles, the green pixels represent the cell area. Scale bar is 20 µm.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. Organelle Area fraction of PC-12 Cells.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

Log [ P ( x , y ) ] = log ( I x , y I r e f )
G P = I b l u e ( x , y ) G I r e d ( x , y ) I b l u e ( x , y ) + G I r e d ( x , y )
G = G P t h e o + G P t h e o × G P e x p 1 G P e x p G P t h e o × G P e x p G P t h e o + G P e x p 1
η ( x , y ) = τ g r e e n ( x , y ) τ b l u e ( x , y )
N ( % ) = N p i x e l O R G N p i x e l C E L L 100
E ( C ) = j = 1 : k x i ϵ C j | | x i C j | | 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.