Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Estimation of Jones matrix, birefringence and entropy using Cloude-Pottier decomposition in polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography: erratum

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

An erratum is presented to correct errors in the equations in [Biomed. Opt. Express 7(9), 3551–3573 (2016)].

© 2016 Optical Society of America

In our paper [1], several errors in the equations have been found and are corrected as below.

Equation (22) of [1] should read

Hnoise(Ei¯)=j=12ζj(i)log4(ζj(i)),
where the negative sign and the base 4 of the logarithm were described correctly. We note that the same base of the logarithm has to be used for the entropy throughout the processing flow.

In addition, Eq. (28) was erroneously presented in [1], which algebraically resulted in 1 regardless of the signals and noises. It was related to the erroneous definition of Eq. (27) in [1]. Equation (27) should be defined to include the bias of the noises as

[s0(1)s1(1)s2(1)s3(1)]:=[|g1H|2¯+|g1V|2¯|g1H|2¯|g1V|2¯2Re[g1Hg1V*¯]2Im[g1Hg1V*¯]]=[|g1H|2¯+|g1V|2¯|g1H|2¯|g1V|2¯2Re[E1HE1V*¯]2Im[E1HE1V*¯]]=[|g1H|2¯+|g1V|2¯|g1H|2¯|g1V|2¯2|E1H|¯|E1V|¯cosδ2|E1H|¯|E1V|¯sinδ]=[|g1H|2¯+|g1V|2¯|g1H|2¯|g1V|2¯2|g1H|2¯|n1H|2¯|g1V|2¯|n1V|2¯cosδ2|g1H|2¯|n1H|2¯|g1V|2¯|n1V|2¯sinδ],
which is based on Eq. (25) of [1]. Equation (28) of [1] should then read
P(1)={s1(1)}2+{s2(1)}2+{s3(1)}2s0(1)=(|g1H|2¯|g1V|2¯)2+4(|g1H|2¯|n1H|2¯)(|g1V|2¯|n1V|2¯)|g1H|2¯+|g1V|2¯.
Consequently, Eqs. (43)-(46) of [1] should read

P(ε1¯)=(|ε1H|2¯|ε1V|2¯)2+4(|ε1H|2¯Var(ε1H))(|ε1V|2¯Var(ε1V))|ε1H|2¯+|ε1V|2¯,
P(ε2¯)=(|ε2H|2¯|ε2V|2¯)2+4(|ε2H|2¯Var(ε2H))(|ε2V|2¯Var(ε2V))|ε2H|2¯+|ε2V|2¯,
P(ε1¯|ε2¯)=(|ε1H|2¯|ε1V|2¯)2+4(|ε1H|2¯Var(ε1H|ε2¯))(|ε1V|2¯Var(ε1V|ε2¯))|ε1H|2¯+|ε1V|2¯,
P(ε2¯|ε1¯)=(|ε2H|2¯|ε2V|2¯)2+4(|ε2H|2¯Var(ε2H|ε1¯))(|ε2V|2¯Var(ε2V|ε1¯))|ε2H|2¯+|ε2V|2¯.

In Eq. (28), |g1H|2¯|n1H|2¯ and |g1V|2¯|n1V|2¯ should be non-negative in principle, but can be negative in practice. If these parameters are negative in the data processing, they are set as zero to avoid physically undefined values of P(1). Similar operations are also applied to Eqs. (43)-(46).

In addition, the last sentence of Section 2.5 shown in the following should be deleted because it was presented incorrectly and did not make sense in [1]; “The absolute-squared expected values of the matrix elements in Eq. (24) or (29) that are used in Eqs. (35)-(42) are calculated as |g1H|2¯|n1H|2¯ and similarly for all other elements.”

Since all of the equations were correctly implemented in our processing software of [1], no change is required in the results.

References and links

1. M. Yamanari, S. Tsuda, T. Kokubun, Y. Shiga, K. Omodaka, N. Aizawa, Y. Yokoyama, N. Himori, S. Kunimatsu-Sanuki, K. Maruyama, H. Kunikata, and T. Nakazawa, “Estimation of Jones matrix, birefringence and entropy using Cloude-Pottier decomposition in polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express 7(9), 3551–3573 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H noise ( E i ¯ )= j=1 2 ζ j (i) log 4 ( ζ j (i) ) ,
[ s 0 (1) s 1 (1) s 2 (1) s 3 (1) ]:=[ | g 1H | 2 ¯ + | g 1V | 2 ¯ | g 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ 2Re[ g 1H g 1V * ¯ ] 2Im[ g 1H g 1V * ¯ ] ]=[ | g 1H | 2 ¯ + | g 1V | 2 ¯ | g 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ 2Re[ E 1H E 1V * ¯ ] 2Im[ E 1H E 1V * ¯ ] ]=[ | g 1H | 2 ¯ + | g 1V | 2 ¯ | g 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ 2 | E 1H | ¯ | E 1V | ¯ cosδ 2 | E 1H | ¯ | E 1V | ¯ sinδ ] =[ | g 1H | 2 ¯ + | g 1V | 2 ¯ | g 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ 2 | g 1H | 2 ¯ | n 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ | n 1V | 2 ¯ cosδ 2 | g 1H | 2 ¯ | n 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ | n 1V | 2 ¯ sinδ ],
P (1) = { s 1 (1) } 2 + { s 2 (1) } 2 + { s 3 (1) } 2 s 0 (1) = ( | g 1H | 2 ¯ | g 1V | 2 ¯ ) 2 +4( | g 1H | 2 ¯ | n 1H | 2 ¯ )( | g 1V | 2 ¯ | n 1V | 2 ¯ ) | g 1H | 2 ¯ + | g 1V | 2 ¯ .
P ( ε 1 ¯ ) = ( | ε 1H | 2 ¯ | ε 1V | 2 ¯ ) 2 +4( | ε 1H | 2 ¯ Var( ε 1H ) )( | ε 1V | 2 ¯ Var( ε 1V ) ) | ε 1H | 2 ¯ + | ε 1V | 2 ¯ ,
P ( ε 2 ¯ ) = ( | ε 2H | 2 ¯ | ε 2V | 2 ¯ ) 2 +4( | ε 2H | 2 ¯ Var( ε 2H ) )( | ε 2V | 2 ¯ Var( ε 2V ) ) | ε 2H | 2 ¯ + | ε 2V | 2 ¯ ,
P ( ε 1 ¯ | ε 2 ¯ ) = ( | ε 1H | 2 ¯ | ε 1V | 2 ¯ ) 2 +4( | ε 1H | 2 ¯ Var( ε 1H | ε 2 ¯ ) )( | ε 1V | 2 ¯ Var( ε 1V | ε 2 ¯ ) ) | ε 1H | 2 ¯ + | ε 1V | 2 ¯ ,
P ( ε 2 ¯ | ε 1 ¯ ) = ( | ε 2H | 2 ¯ | ε 2V | 2 ¯ ) 2 +4( | ε 2H | 2 ¯ Var( ε 2H | ε 1 ¯ ) )( | ε 2V | 2 ¯ Var( ε 2V | ε 1 ¯ ) ) | ε 2H | 2 ¯ + | ε 2V | 2 ¯ .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.