Add to BibSonomy
Abstract
The accuracy of the absolute radiometric calibration (RadCal) for remote sensing instruments is essential to their wide range of applications. The uncertainty associated with the traditional source-based RadCal method is assessed at a 2% (${k} = {1}$) or higher level for radiance measurement. To further improve the accuracy to meet the demands of climate studies, a detector-based approach using tunable lasers as a light source has been devised. The Goddard Laser for Absolute Measurement of Radiance, known as the GLAMR system, is a notable example of the incorporation of such technology. Using transfer radiometers calibrated at the National Institute of Standards and Technology as calibration standards, the absolute spectral response function of a remote sensing instrument is measured with its uncertainty traceable to the International System of Units. This paper presents a comprehensive uncertainty analysis of the detector-based absolute RadCal using the GLAMR system. It identifies and examines uncertainty sources during the GLAMR RadCal test, including those from the GLAMR system, the testing configuration, and data processing methodologies. Analysis is carried out to quantify the contribution of each source and emphasize the most influential factors. It is shown that the calibration uncertainty of GLAMR RadCal can be better than 0.3% (${k} = {1}$) in the wavelength range of 350–950 nm and 0.6% (${k} = {1}$) between 950 and 2300 nm, with the exception of regions with strong water absorption. In addition, recommendations are made to refine the calibration process to further reduce the uncertainty.
© 2024 Optica Publishing Group
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Brian G. Alberding, John T. Woodward, Ping-Shine Shaw, Leonard M. Hanssen, Catherine C. Cooksey, and Joseph P. Rice
Appl. Opt. 61(11) 2957-2966 (2022)
B. C. Johnson, Giuseppe Zibordi, Steven W. Brown, Michael E. Feinholz, Mikhail G. Sorokin, Ilya Slutsker, John T. Woodward, and Howard W. Yoon
Appl. Opt. 60(12) 3380-3392 (2021)
Steven W. Brown, George P. Eppeldauer, and Keith R. Lykke
Appl. Opt. 45(32) 8218-8237 (2006)