Abstract
The range of validity of the Rayleigh–Debye–Gans approximation for the optical cross sections of fractal aggregates (RDG-FA) that are formed by uniform small particles was evaluated in comparison with the integral equation formulation for scattering (IEFS), which accounts for the effects of multiple scattering and self-interaction. Numerical simulations were performed to create aggregates that exhibit mass fractallike characteristics with a wide range of particle and aggregate sizes and morphologies, including x p = 0.01–1.0, |m − 1| = 0.1–2.0, N = 16–256, and D f = 1.0–3.0. The percent differences between both scattering theories were presented as error contour charts in the |m − 1|x p domains for various size aggregates, emphasizing fractal properties representative of diffusion-limited cluster–cluster aggregation. These charts conveniently identified the regions in which the differences were less than 10%, between 10% and 30%, and more than 30% for easy to use general guidelines for suitability of the RDG-FA theory in any scattering applications of interest, such as laser-based particulate diagnostics. Various types of aggregate geometry ranging from straight chains (D f ≈ 1.0) to compact clusters (D f ≈ 3.0) were also considered for generalization of the findings. For the present computational conditions, the RDG-FA theory yielded accurate predictions to within 10% for |m − 1| to approximately 1 or more as long as the primary particles in aggregates were within the Rayleigh scattering limit (x p ≤ 0.3). Additionally, the effect of fractal dimension on the performance of the RDG-FA was generally found to be insignificant. The results suggested that the RDG-FA theory is a reasonable approximation for optics of a wide range of fractal aggregates, considerably extending its domain of applicability.
© 1996 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Genmiao Wang and Christopher M. Sorensen
Appl. Opt. 41(22) 4645-4651 (2002)
Rajan K. Chakrabarty, Hans Moosmüller, W. Patrick Arnott, Mark A. Garro, Jay G. Slowik, Eben S. Cross, Jeong-Ho Han, Paul Davidovits, Timothy B. Onasch, and Douglas R. Worsnop
Appl. Opt. 46(28) 6990-7006 (2007)
Yan Zhao and Lin Ma
Appl. Opt. 48(3) 591-597 (2009)