James D. Lindberg and James B. Gillespie, "Relationship between particle size and imaginary refractive index in atmospheric dust," Appl. Opt. 16, 2628-2630 (1977)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
The X indicates that the material was present; the symbol—indicates that the material was detectable but present in much lower concentration.
Specifically montmorillonite, illite, and kaolin group clays.
The presence of carbon was estimated by other means, as discussed in text.
Table II
Imaginary Refractive Indices of Size Fractionated Dust Samplea
Note: The numbers at the bottom of the table indicate the manufacturers stated diameter range, in micrometers, for each stage of the Andersen sampler.
Values indicated by the * are less than 0.005.
Due to a decimal point error in data reduction each of the imaginary indices given in this Table II is a factor of 10 too high.
Tables (2)
Table I
Optically Significant Components of Size Fractionated Dust Samplesa
The X indicates that the material was present; the symbol—indicates that the material was detectable but present in much lower concentration.
Specifically montmorillonite, illite, and kaolin group clays.
The presence of carbon was estimated by other means, as discussed in text.
Table II
Imaginary Refractive Indices of Size Fractionated Dust Samplea
Note: The numbers at the bottom of the table indicate the manufacturers stated diameter range, in micrometers, for each stage of the Andersen sampler.
Values indicated by the * are less than 0.005.
Due to a decimal point error in data reduction each of the imaginary indices given in this Table II is a factor of 10 too high.