Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Recovering 3-D structure from motion using positions vs velocities

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Perceptual studies suggest that the visual system uses the rigidity assumption to recover 3-D structure from motion. Computational studies show that the rigidity assumption allows a unique 3-D interpretation from motion information integrated over a small extent in space and time. Most algorithms for recovering structure, however, are sensitive to noise and only interpret rigid motions. Ullman1 proposed the “incremental rigidity scheme” that interprets rigid and nonrigid motions and develops a 3-D model over an extended time. As new views of points appear, a new model is computed that represents the most rigid transformation from the current model. We present a formulation of Ullman’s method that uses velocity information for recovering structure. Theoretical and computer analyses show that this continuous formulation provides a quick estimate of structure but is not robust over an extended time period. The stable long-term recovery of structure requires disparate views of moving objects. For rotation about a fixed axis, the rate of convergence and quality of the 3-D solution decreases with smaller angular displacements between frames. In the limit of the continuous formulation, the solution is no longer stable. Our analysis raises important questions for the human recovery of structure from motion.

© 1985 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction

Douglas Williams, Gregory Phillips, and Robert Sekuler
FQ4 OSA Annual Meeting (FIO) 1985

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.