Abstract
Light-induced heating under high-average-power laser is investigated in LiNbO3-type crystals in green second-harmonic generation. A rate-equation based on the kinetics of polarons is proposed and important parameters of the rate-equation are determined by reproducing experimental results. Light-induced heat and threshold intensity of catastrophic breakdown are evaluated using the rate-equation. The accumulation effect of polarons causes the decrease of threshold intensity of catastrophic breakdown of crystals.
© 2016 Optical Society of America
1. Introduction
High-power continuous-wave (CW) lasers, which have average power ranging from several watts to kilowatts, are used in many industries, including laser processing, laser machining, and laser displays. LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 crystals are especially useful for second-harmonic generation (SHG) of CW light from the infrared to visible regions because of the high nonlinearity [1]. However, laser-induced breakdown and damage in nonlinear crystals limit output laser power in high-average-power lasers, where the breakdown threshold intensities of green light for LiTaO3 are in the order of several tens of MW/cm2 [2].
Since the 1990s, absorption due to the presence of long-lived excited states, like polarons, has been studied in LiNbO3 and LiTaO3 crystals [3]. The dynamics of polarons is investigated by various theoretical models [4–7]. The stretched-exponential decay behavior of polarons, however, is not yet completely clear.
We proposed that one of the causes of the catastrophic breakdown is a light-induced heating by the accumulated polarons [8]. Using a simple rate-equation model, we evaluated the absorption power density of polaron, , where I and are the laser ω intensity and frequency, β is the two-photon absorption coefficient, σp is the absorption cross section of polarons, Rp is the decay rate of polarons. The absorption power density is proportional to the cube of the laser intensity. The light-induced heating causes the breakdown of LiNbO3 crystal at relatively low intensities of the order of MW/cm2.
In this paper, we investigate light-induced heating by absorption due to a long-lived polarons and thermal breakdown in LiNbO3 crystals. In Sec. 2, we propose a modified rate-equation model for fundamental and second-harmonic laser lights. In Sec. 3, important parameters of the rate-equation are determined by reproducing experimental results and light induced heat is evaluated using the rate-equation model that could easily couple the thermal equation model to estimate heating. Some concluding remarks are given in Sec. 4.
2. Rate-equation model
The absorption mechanism for light-induced heating consists of the following three steps: (1) generation of conduction-band (CB) electrons and holes by two-photon absorption, (2) formation of electron and hole polarons [9] via the CB electrons and holes, and (3) light absorption by polarons.
In the previous rate-equation model [8], for simplicity, we treated polarons as one polaron without distinguishing between different types of polarons. In LiNbO3 crystal, there are typically four kinds of polarons, which are the free electron polaron , bound electron polaron , bound electron bipolaron , and bound hole polaron (O−). A kinetic model including iron impurities has been already proposed [10, 11]. Using the kinetic model, we propose a modified rate-equation that treats three kinds of polarons except the bipolaron, because , , and O− polarons are dominating in magnesium(Mg)-doped LiNbO3 [12]. In the model, we neglect the iron impurities because impurities reduced crystals are used in SHG. A schematic of the model is shown in Fig. 1. In SHG of green light, there are infrared and green lights, hereafter referred to as IR and GR lights, respectively.
The rate equations for the number densities of CB electrons, ne, holes, nh, and ni (i = 1,2,3) show the number densities of the free electron polaron , bound electron polaron , and bound hole polaron (O−), respectively, can be written as
where I1 and I2 are the intensity and ω1 and ω2 are the frequency of IR and GR lights, β is the two-photon absorption coefficient of GR light, σi(ω1) and σi(ω2) are the absorption cross section of polarons (i = 1,2,3) for IR and GR lights, Te−1 and Te−2 are the trapping coefficient of CB electrons with and , and Th−3 is the trapping coefficient of holes, Rj−k is the recombination coefficient of between j and k states (j,k = e,h,1,2,3), γ1−2 and γ2−1 are electrons transition coefficients from and polarons to and , respectively, and is the number density of sites that can become , , and O− polarons. strongly depends on the composition of crystals.3. Important parameters and light-induced heat
These rate equations have more than twenty parameters to characterize crystals. Most values, except absorption cross sections of polaron and two-photon absorption coefficients, however, have not been directly determined experimentally or theoretically. We use the absorption cross sections of polarons [12] and two-photon absorption coefficients β [13–15] already determined experimentally.
First, some important parameters are determined by the result that the generation time of polarons was reported to be less than 10−12 s [16, 17], namely, CB electrons and holes generated by two-photon absorption are rapidly trapped before CB electrons or holes directly recombine. Because the generation time is less than 10−12 s, we assume that the trapping coefficients Te−1, Te−2, and Th−3 are 10−7 cm3/s and the recombination coefficients Re−h, R1 −h, R2−h, and R3−e would have would to be less than the trapping coefficients. Therefore, we assume that the recombination coefficients are much less than 10−7 cm3/s. Because there are almost no CB electron and hole when relaxation of n1, n2, and n3 starts, the recombination coefficients (R1−h,R2−h,R3−e) do not affect the polarons dynamics. Three densities, and four coefficients R1−3, R2−3, γ1−2, and γ2−1 remain.
Second, three densities must be determined by the composition of crystals. The model includes anti-site defects (NbLi), which number density is an important parameter. We consider that the number density of anti-site defects expresses the difference of the Mg-doped, congurent, and stoichiometric composition. We are interested in Mg-doped LiNbO3, which is popular in SHG. The density of the unit cell is 3.1 × 1021 cm−3. Then, we assumed that , , and , which represent , , and O2− near the Li vacancy, respectively.
Third, by fitting the experimentally obtained stretched exponential curve for Mg-doped LiNbO3 [14] which was fitted by exp[−(t/τ)β ], where τ = 40ns, β = 0.37, the remaining four parameters are determined to be R1−3 = 4 × 10−11 cm3/s, R2−3 = 0.1 × 10−11 cm3/s, γ1−2 = 4 × 10−11 cm3/s, and γ2−1 = 4 × 10−cm3/s. The ratio γ1−2/γ2−1 strongly depends on the temperature. Figure 2 shows the temporal evolution of the light-induced absorption of the model and experimental results. The results of the model calculation using these parameters reproduce the stretched-exponential decay well. Figure 3 shows the temporal evolution of the number density of polarons. The apparent stretched-exponential decay is reproduced by the absorption contribution varying from the free electron polaron to the bound electron polaron . The bound hole polaron (O−), which absorption cross section of 780 nm is small compared with electron polarons, do not almost contribute the absorption.
Light-induced heat in SHG is evaluated using the rate equation with these parameters. All parameters for simulation are shown in Table 1. Using the number densities of polarons, we can obtain the absorption power density of polarons, Qp ≃ α1I1 + α2I2, where α1,2 = Σi=1,3σi(ω1,2)ni. Figure 4 shows the absorption power density as a function of the second harmonic and fundamental laser intensities.
We evaluate temperature increase by the same conditions as previous study [8]. Absorption power density Q = 22 MW/cm3 is the critical power density required for reaching melting temperature of 1530 K. The critical intensity of second harmonic laser without fundamental laser. When intensity of the fundamental laser remains 48 MW/cm2 and 130 MW/cm2, and 10 MW/cm2, respectively. If a critical temperature exists before reaching melting temperature, the critical intensity could be less than .
4. Concluding remarks
We propose a modified rate-equation based on the polaron kinetics previously proposed [10, 11]. Important parameters of the rate-equation are determined by reproducing the experimental results [14]. We show that the kinetic model which includes the relaxation between free and bound polarons reproduces the experimental results well. However, it is possible that there are different sets of parameters that produce similar curve. The kinetic model is non-dimensional model; however, because hopping charge transport is also important [4, 5], it will be necessary to decide these coefficients more carefully in future studies.
We evaluate the temperature increase and estimate the critical intensity of breakdown using the rate equation. The laser intensities close to experimental findings and light-induced heat was estimated as a trigger of catastrophic breakdown.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI ( 25610173, 15H03760).
References and links
1. S. V. Tovstonog, S. Kurimura, I. Suzuki, K. Takeno, S. Moriwaki, N. Ohmae, N. Mio, and T. Katagai, “Thermal effects in high-power CW second harmonic generation in Mg-doped stoichiometric lithium tantalate,” Opt. Express 16(15), 11294–11299 (2008). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. S. Kurimura, H. H. Lim, and N. E. Yu, “Green-suppressed quasi-phase-matched optical parametric oscillation,” in Advanced Solid-State Lasers Congress, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2013), paper ATu4A.8. [CrossRef]
3. F. Jermann and J. Otten, “Light-induced charge transport in LiNbO3:Fe at high light intensities,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10(11), 2085–2092 (1993). [CrossRef]
4. B. Sturman, E. Podivilov, and M. Gorkunov, “Origin of stretched exponential relaxation for hopping-transport models,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91(17), 176602 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. J. Carnicero, M. Carrascosa, G. García, and F. Agulló-López, “Site correlation effects in the dynamics of iron impurities Fe2+/Fe3+ and antisite defects after a short-pulse excitation in LiNbO3,” Phys. Rev. B 72(24), 245108 (2005). [CrossRef]
6. C. Merschjann, M. Imlau, H. Brüning, B. Schoke, and S. Torbrügge, “Nonexponential relaxation dynamics of localized carrier densities in oxide crystals without structural or energetic disorder,” Phys. Rev. B 84(5), 052302 (2011). [CrossRef]
7. F. Luedtke, K. Buse, and B. Sturman, “Hidden reservoir of photoactive electrons in LiNbO3 crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(2), 026603 (2012). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8. S. Kato, S. Kurimura, H. H. Lim, and N. Mio, “Induced heating by nonlinear absorption in LiNbO3-type crystals under continuous-wave laser irradiation,” Opt. Mater. 40, 10–13 (2015). [CrossRef]
9. O. F. Schirmer, M. Imlau, C. Merschjann, and B. Schoke, “Electron small polarons and bipolarons in LiNbO3,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21(12), 123201 (2009).
10. P. Herth, T. Granzow, D. Schaniel, T. Woike, M. Imlau, and E. Kratzig, “Evidence for light-induced hole polarons in LiNbO3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(6), 067404 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. C. Merschjann, B. Schoke, and M. Imlau, “Influence of chemical reduction on the particular number densities of light-induced small electron and hole polarons in nominally pure LiNbO3,” Phys. Rev. B 76(8), 085114 (2007). [CrossRef]
12. C. Merschjann, B. Schoke, D. Conradi, M. Imlau, G. Corradi, and K. Polgár, “Absorption cross sections and number densities of electron and hole polarons in congruently melting LiNbO3,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21(1), 015906 (2009).
13. O. Beyer, D. Maxein, K. Buse, B. Sturman, H. T. Hsieh, and D. Psaltis, “Femtosecond time-resolved absorption processes in lithium niobate crystals,” Opt. Lett. 30(11), 1366–1368 (2005). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. S. Sasamoto, J. Hirohashi, and S. Ashihara, “Polaron dynamics in lithium niobate upon femtosecond pulse irradiation: Influence of magnesium doping and stoichiometry control,” J. Appl. Phys. 105(8), 083102 (2009). [CrossRef]
15. S. M. Kostritskii and M. Aillerie, “Z-scan study of nonlinear absorption in reduced LiNbO3 crystals,” J. Appl. Phys. 111(10), 103504 (2012). [CrossRef]
16. Y. Qiu, K. B. Ucer, and R. T. Williams, “Formation time of a small electron polaron in LiNbO3: measurements and interpretation,” Phys. Status Solidi C 2(1), 232–235 (2005). [CrossRef]
17. O. Beyer, D. Maxein, T. Woike, and K. Buse, “Generation of small bound polarons in lithium niobate crystals on the subpicosecond time scale,” Appl. Phys. B 83(4), 527–530 (2006). [CrossRef]