Abstract
We provide an updated comparison of second hyperpolazability of carbon disulfide reported in [Opt. Express 23(17), 22224 (2015) [CrossRef] Optica 3(6), 657 (2016) [CrossRef] ].
© 2016 Optical Society of America
The liquid phase measurements of the bound-electronic nonlinear refractive index n2,el reported in [1] have been corrected by subtracting the cuvette contribution to the measurement [2]. Here we reproduce Table 4 (Table 1 here) from [3] with these corrected values, which further improves agreement between gas and liquid phase measurements of the second hyperpolarizability γ.
Funding
Funding was provided by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (FA9550-10-1-0558) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) (ECCS- 1229563, ECCS-1202471).
References and Links
1. M. Reichert, H. Hu, M. R. Ferdinandus, M. Seidel, P. Zhao, T. R. Ensley, D. Peceli, J. M. Reed, D. A. Fishman, S. Webster, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Temporal, spectral and polarization dependence of the nonlinear optical response of carbon disulfide,” Optica 1(6), 436 (2014). [CrossRef]
2. M. Reichert, H. Hu, M. R. Ferdinandus, M. Seidel, P. Zhao, T. R. Ensley, D. Peceli, J. M. Reed, D. A. Fishman, S. Webster, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Temporal, spectral and polarization dependence of the nonlinear optical response of carbon disulfide: erratum,” Optica 3(6), 657 (2016). [CrossRef]
3. M. Reichert, P. Zhao, J. M. Reed, T. R. Ensley, D. J. Hagan, and E. W. Van Stryland, “Beam deflection measurement of bound-electronic and rotational nonlinear refraction in molecular gases,” Opt. Express 23(17), 22224–22237 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed]