Abstract
When monochromatic light is scattered from an optically rough surface a complicated three-dimensional (3D) field is generated. These fields are often described by reference to the 3D volume (extent) of their speckles, leading to the definition of lateral and longitudinal speckle sizes (z). For reasons of mathematical simplicity the longitudinal speckle size is often derived by examining the decorrelation of the speckle field for a single point lying on axis, i.e., , and this size is generally assumed to be representative for other speckles that lie further off-axis. Some recent theoretical results, however, indicate that in fact longitudinal speckle size gets smaller as the observation position moves to off-axis spatial locations. In this paper (Part I), we review the physical argument leading to this conclusion and support this analysis with a series of robust numerical simulations. We discuss, in some detail, computational issues that arise when simulating the propagation of speckle fields numerically, showing that the spectral method is not a suitable propagation algorithm when the autocorrelation of the scattering surface is assumed to be delta correlated. In Part II [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28, 1904 (2011)] of this paper, experimental results are provided that exhibit the predicted variation of longitudinal speckle size as a function of position in x and y. The results are not only of theoretical interest but have practical implications, and in Part II a method for locating the optical system axis is proposed and experimentally demonstrated.
© 2011 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Dayan Li, Damien P. Kelly, and John T. Sheridan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28(9) 1904-1908 (2011)
Dayan Li, Damien P. Kelly, Raoul Kirner, and John T. Sheridan
Appl. Opt. 51(4) A1-A10 (2012)
Jennifer E. Ward, Damien P. Kelly, and John T. Sheridan
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26(8) 1855-1864 (2009)