Abstract

The physical interpretation of the absorbance observed in a non-scattering sample is straightforward; it is a simple function of the concentration of the analyte(s) and its (their) ability to absorb light. In a scattering sample, the phenomena of absorption and scattering affect each other. Consequently, the measured “absorbance” is more difficult to interpret and is not suitable for direct comparison to an “absorbance” obtained from a non-scattering sample. This paper describes a strategy for separating the effects of scatter and absorption. The amount of light absorbed by a sample can be determined by measuring both the amount of light remitted and the amount transmitted by the sample. Using the mathematics of plane parallel layers, it is possible to model the sample as a series of “layers” of any thickness and calculate the absorption, remission and transmission for each of these hypothetical layers. The absorption computed for a layer having a thickness of one particle, which we term the “representative layer”, can be used to benchmark the absorbance that would be observed from the sample in the absence of scatter.

© 2013 IM Publications LLP

Verification of a two-layer inverse Monte Carlo absorption model using multiple source-detector separation diffuse reflectance spectroscopy

Manu Sharma, Ricky Hennessy, Mia K. Markey, and James W. Tunnell
Biomed. Opt. Express 5(1) 40-53 (2014)

Separation of absorption and scattering profiles in spectroscopic optical coherence tomography using a least-squares algorithm

Chenyang Xu, Daniel L. Marks, Minh N. Do, and Stephen A. Boppart
Opt. Express 12(20) 4790-4802 (2004)

Light scattering and form birefringence of parallel cylindrical arrays that represent cellular organelles of the retinal nerve fiber layer

Qienyuan Zhou and Robert W. Knighton
Appl. Opt. 36(10) 2273-2285 (1997)

Scattering-independent glucose absorption measurement using a spectrally resolved reflectance setup with specialized variable source-detector separations

Jin Liu, Caigang Zhu, Jingying Jiang, and Kexin Xu
Biomed. Opt. Express 9(12) 5903-5914 (2018)

Separating the scattering and absorption coefficients using the real and imaginary parts of the refractive index with low-coherence interferometry

Francisco E. Robles and Adam Wax
Opt. Lett. 35(17) 2843-2845 (2010)