Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group
  • Journal of Lightwave Technology
  • Vol. 22,
  • Issue 9,
  • pp. 2021-
  • (2004)

Power Comparison Between High-Speed Electrical and Optical Interconnects for Interchip Communication

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

An I/O bandwidth commensurate with a dramatically increasing on-chip computational capability is highly desirable. Achieving this goal using board-level copper interconnects in the future will become increasingly challenging owing to severe increase in high-frequency,skin-effect and dielectric loss, noise due to crosstalk, impedance mismatch,and package reflections. The solutions designed to overcome these deleterious effects require complex signal processing at the interconnect endpoints, which results in a larger power and area requirement. Optical interconnects offer a powerful alternative, potentially at a lower power. Prior work in comparing the two technologies has entailed overly simplified assumptions pertaining to either the optical or the electrical system. In this paper, we draw a more realistic power comparison with respect to the relevant parameters such as bandwidth, interconnect length and bit error rate (BER) by capturing the essential complexity in both types of interconnect systems. At the same time, we preserve the simplicity by using mostly analytical models, verified by SPICE simulations where possible. We also identify critical device and system parameters, which have a large effect on power dissipation in each type of interconnect, while quantifying the severity of their impact. For optical interconnect, these parameters are detector and modulator capacitance, responsivity, coupling efficiency and modulator type; whereas, in the case of electrical system,the critical parameters include receiver sensitivity/offset and impedance mismatch. Toward this end, we first present an optimization scheme to minimize optical interconnect power and quantify its performance as a function of future technology nodes. Next, on the electrical interconnect side, we examine the power dissipation of a state-of-the-art electrical interconnect, which uses simultaneous bidirectional signaling with transmitter equalization and on-chip noise cancellation. Finally, we draw extensive comparisons between optical and electrical interconnects. As an example, for bandwidth of 6 Gb/s at 100 nm technology node, lengths greater than the critical length of about 43 cm yields lower power in optical interconnects. This length becomes lower (making optics more favorable) with higher data rates and lower bit error rate requirement.

© 2004 IEEE

PDF Article
More Like This
Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations

Michael R. Feldman, Sadik C. Esener, Clark C. Guest, and Sing H. Lee
Appl. Opt. 27(9) 1742-1751 (1988)

Speed and energy analysis of digital interconnections: comparison of on-chip, off-chip, and free-space technologies

Gökçe I. Yayla, Philippe J. Marchand, and Sadik C. Esener
Appl. Opt. 37(2) 205-227 (1998)

Comparison between electrical and free space optical interconnects for fine grain processor arrays based on interconnect density capabilities

Michael R. Feldman, Clark C. Guest, Timothy J. Drabik, and Sadik C. Esener
Appl. Opt. 28(18) 3820-3829 (1989)

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All Rights Reserved