Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Development of tunable electro-optical properties on U-shaped-alignment in-plane switching liquid crystal devices

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The tunable electro-optical properties of U-shaped-alignment (USA) in-plane switching (IPS) liquid crystal (LC) devices are successfully developed by adjusting the curing voltage (VCU) and the surface-anchored crosslinking monomer concentration during the polymerization process. As the VCU is increased, the threshold voltage and maximum-output-light-transmittance voltage are reduced, attributed to the pretilt effect on the LC molecular configuration. Furthermore, the dark-state brightness and the response performance are also changed. Of all the proposed devices, the 2-wt.% USA-IPS LC device through 2-V VCU treatment is the best candidate for the fast switching applications. This fabricated method will benefit the design of device properties.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

In-plane switching (IPS) display mode has attracted much industrial and academic attention because of its wide viewing angle and good image response [1]. The mechanical rubbing process is usually employed in conventional IPS-based liquid crystal (LC) devices to effectively align the LC molecular configuration [2]. Although this treatment is suitable for mass production, the produced particles and the electrostatic charges are revealed in the alignment layer. In addition, the drawbacks of the IPS-based LC devices are the light leakage in the dark state and the poor contrast ratio (CR) [3]. In contrast, the vertically aligned (VA) LC devices do not need the rubbing process, and exhibit a high CR, which is because the LC molecules are vertically aligned on the substrate surface. However, the VA-based devices that use a negative dielectric anisotropy LC (negative LC) usually have a long response time [4], especially for the fall time (tf). The tf response, obtained when the driving voltage is released, is only related to the device thickness and the material parameters of negative LCs, such as the rotational viscosity and the bend elastic constant, which cannot be improved by overdriving [5]. In contrast, the rise time (tr) response can be improved by the overdrive method [6], but additional driving schemes are needed. To eliminate the disadvantages of the IPS- and VA-based devices, VA-IPS devices using “positive” LC material have been demonstrated [7], but their higher threshold voltage (Vth) and lower output light transmittance need improvement.

To effectively govern the LC molecular configuration and improve the electro-optical performance of LC-based devices, several methods of producing the pretilt structure in the device have been proposed [8–13]. However, these methods have very complex process and stability issues, which are not favorable for multi-pretilt structure fabrication. Recently, polymer networks, due to their low cost and simple development, have been wieldy employed in the LC molecular alignment process. Applying the polymer networks in the VA display modes can obviously improve the tr response [14–19], whereas the produced pretilt structure leads to a slow tf response and low CR [20]. In 2013, Lee et al. used an in-plane field and lower monomer concentration (~0.1 wt.%) to give the LC molecules near the substrate surface a small pretilt angle [21], which avoids light leakage in the dark state, but degrades the tf response due to the lack of a sufficient anchoring effect on the LC molecular reorientation. Although applying higher monomer concentration (three-dimensional polymer networks) to the VA-based LC devices can improve the tf response owing to the stronger polymer anchoring effect on the LC molecular configuration, a very high driving voltage (~80 V) is required to ensure a fast tr response [22].

To adjust and improve the electro-optical properties of VA-IPS LC devices, an effective method, doping the TA-9164 monomer into the pure E7 LC device at the mixed concentration of 2 wt.%, is demonstrated by our research group. The developed crosslinking polymer networks from TA-9164 monomer material are anchored on the substrate surface and observed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM). This kind of VA-IPS LC/polymer device not only produces faster tr and tf responses, but also significantly reduces the driving voltage (< 15 V) [23], as compared to the other research results (≥ 30 V) [21,22]. Although the increment of the mixed monomer concentration (≥ 4 wt.%) can further effectively govern the LC molecular dynamic alignment, obvious light scattering at the initial state and higher driving voltage (≥ 20 V) are revealed [24]. Thus, the appropriately mixed monomer concentration applied to the VA-IPS LC device is 2 wt.%. Moreover, during the polymerization process, applying the 2-wt.% TA-9164 polymer networks and a small curing voltage (VCU = 2 V) creating the non-uniform vertical electric field to the VA-IPS E7 LC device cannot only achieve a stable and functional multi-pretilt structure, but can also further refine the electro-optical properties [25]. The produced pretilt angle (θ) is around 2° with respect to the normal direction of the substrate surface, which solves the problems of light leakage and the slow tf response. In addition to the TA-9164 monomer material, two types of monomer materials, UCL002 and NOA65, are also used in the VA-IPS E7 LC devices. However, the electro-optical properties of these two kinds of devices (VA-IPS E7 LC/UCL002 and /NOA65 polymer devices) are not superior to those of the VA-IPS E7 LC/TA-9164 polymer device [26]. Thus, understanding the effects of LC molecular configuration and monomer concentration on the device properties is very important, and is significantly related to optical material science. Based on our previous research results, employing the TA-9164 monomer material in the VA-IPS E7 LC device can be significantly beneficial to its electro-optical performance.

In this paper, to develop the tunable electro-optical properties of U-shaped-alignment (USA) IPS LC devices, four kinds of curing voltages (VCU = 2 V, 4 V, 6 V, and 8 V) and two kinds of mixed concentrations (Conc. = 1 wt.% and 2 wt.%) are selected and applied to the VA-IPS-based LC devices to provide the reader with the complete information and to benefit readers in the application and design fields. During the polymerization process, the VCU and TA-164 monomer are simultaneously applied to the VA-IPS LC devices to the control of the LC molecular dynamic alignment of the VA-IPS-based LC devices with the lower monomer concentration (≤ 2 wt.%). The original VA LC molecular configuration through this process is changed to a stable U-shaped configuration. Different curing voltages make different USA LC molecular configurations, which are observed from the polarized optical microscope (POM) and conoscope. The electro-optical properties of the proposed USA-IPS E7 LC/TA-9164 polymer devices, Vth, VTmax, output light transmittance, optical switch, and gray-level responses, not only depend on the VCU, but also on the mixed monomer concentration. This indicates that the tunable electro-optical properties of USA-IPS LC devices can be successfully achieved by appropriately adjusting the VCU and mixed monomer concentration. Of all kinds of devices, the fastest and slowest responses are revealed in the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device with the VCU of 2 V and in the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device with the VCU of 8 V, respectively, which results from the small pretilt and stronger polymer anchoring effects on the LC molecular reorientation. The proposed fabrication method will be beneficial to the optimized performance design of optical components and systems, due to the fact that the effects of LC/polymer mixture are employed in many kinds of optical components to effectively change their electro-optical properties.

2. Device fabrication and measurement

In the experiment, the USA-IPS LC devices with the tunable electro-optical properties are fabricated by applying the curing voltage and surface-anchored crosslinking monomer to the VA-IPS LC devices during the polymerization process. This process changes the LC molecular alignment from VA to USA, and makes a pretilt configuration at one of the substrates. The detailed device structure and fabrication are shown in Fig. 1 and are described below. Indium tin oxide (ITO) thin film is deposited on the top- and bottom-glass substrates. The interdigital electrodes, which have 4-μm width (w) and 8-μm space (s), are created on the bottom-glass substrate surface. Both prepared substrates are coated with the AL60101L VA polyimide (V-PI), and then heated at 200 °C for 1 hr. 4-μm spacers are employed in the devices to control the device thickness. The TA-9164 monomer material from Tatung University is selected and mixed with the nematic E7 LC (Δn = 0.218 and Δε = + 14.5) from Merck at a specific concentration. The mixed concentration is defined as the ratio of the monomer weight to the sum of the monomer and E7 LC weight. Based on the previous study [23–26], two types of mixed concentrations, 1 wt.% and 2 wt.%, were chosen in this research. The mixture is then injected into the prepared devices by capillary action. During the polymerization process, 365-nm ultraviolet (UV) light with 16 mW/cm2 and the specific value of VCU inducing the USA electric field are applied to the prepared VA-IPS E7 LC/TA-9164 monomer devices for 30 min. After the polymerization process, the VCU is removed and the surface-anchoring crosslinking TA-9164 polymers recorded by SEM and inserted in step 4 of Fig. 1 are formed. The produced pretilt angle and the USA LC molecular configuration are stable without a holding voltage. Different curing voltages create different USA LC molecular configurations, which leads to the USA-IPS LC/polymer device with the tunable electro-optical properties. Once the USA LC molecular structure is achieved, the IPS voltage (VIPS) is applied to the USA-IPS LC/polymer devices, making the LC molecules reorient and parallel to the direction of the IPS electric fields. The USA-IPS LC device with 1-wt% TA-9164 polymers and the USA-IPS LC device with 2-wt% TA-9164 polymers are respectively named as the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device and the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device in the following content. In the electro-optical measurement, these different kinds of USA-IPS LC/polymer devices are sandwiched between the crossed polarizers, and are oriented to 45° with respect to the polarizer. VIPS-dependent light transmittance curves, optical-switch response (switching between the maximum brightness state and the dark state), and specific gray-level responses (driving between the zeroth state and the specific state) are performed by employing a diode laser with a 650-nm wavelength and ac voltage with 1 kHz square waveform in these devices.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic illustrations of the fabrication process of USA (pretilt) configuration and LC molecular orientation for a USA-IPS device. Step 1 shows that the V-PI is coated on the ITO and IPS substrate surfaces. The processed substrates are baked at 200 °C for 1 hr as shown in Step 2. Step 3 shows the UV curing process by applying the TA-9164 monomer, VCU and UV light to the pure VA-IPS LC device. The induced U-shaped curing electric field is shown with dashed lines. Step 4 shows the LC molecular reorientation when the IPS electric field induced by VIPS is applied to the fabricated USA-IPS LC/polymer device. The inserted SEM image shows the crosslinking morphology of TA-9164 polymers on the substrate surface.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussions

To produce the USA-IPS devices with the tunable electro-optical properties, firstly, the pure VA-IPS LC device without the TA-9164 polymers is selected to investigate the effects of VCU on the LC molecular configuration. The VCU-dependent transmittance, brightness recorded by POM, and LC molecular configuration recorded by conoscope are shown in Fig. 2(a). The normalized output light transmittance (Norm. T.) is shown on the vertical axis. As the VCU is less than 1 V, the VA LC molecules, which are almost perpendicular to the substrate surface, are not obviously driven, as shown from the inserted conoscopic images. With the red-line reticle labeled on the conoscopic images, the device at the small VCU (< 1 V) shows an excellent VA quality for LC molecules and a clear edge on the four lobes, indicating that the strength of the induced electric field is insufficient to make the original VA LC molecules reorient. In this case, the extremely small light transmittance and the dark-state image are revealed and shown from the inserted POM images. However, when the VCU is gradually increased, the LC molecules located on the IPS-electrode edge start tilting to the substrate surface, leading to the fact that the light transmittance will be increased. As the applied VCU is more than 2 V, the distortion and deformation for the reticle and lobes in the conoscopic images will become obvious, and the brightness in the POM images will no longer be dark. This suggests that the LC molecular configuration starts changing from VA to USA. The light transmittance of the device at the higher VCU (> 4 V) is remarkable because the increased strength of the induced electric field can drive more LC molecules, which are not only located at the IPS-electrode edge, but also at the IPS-electrode space (s). A higher VCU (> 4 V) results in the notable USA LC molecular configuration, but the produced larger pretilt angle with respect to the normal direction of the substrate surface will cause light leakage and further reduce the response (as will be shown later). The USA LC molecular configurations under the low and high VCU are illustrated in Fig. 2(b) and 2(c), respectively. In this paper, two kinds of mixed concentration, 1 wt.% and 2 wt.%, are selected. The VA-IPS LC/polymer devices are fabricated at four kinds of curing voltage, 2 V, 4 V, 6 V, and 8 V, during the process of polymerization. Once the stabilized crosslinking polymers are well developed, the LC molecular configuration will be changed from the VA to the USA profile, and the stable USA-IPS LC molecular structure will be achieved without any holding voltage [25].

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) T-V curve for the pure E7 LC device in the presence of different curing voltages. The inserted POM and conoscopic images show the VCU-dependent brightness and pretilt configuration of the pure E7 LC device. As the VCU is increased, the reticle, labeled by the red line in the conoscopic image at a VCU of 0 V, will be distorted and eliminated. (b) and (c) effect of the small and large VCU on the LC molecular configuration, respectively. The small VCU makes the small U-shaped (pretilt) structure, and most LC molecules are vertically aligned and perpendicular to the substrate surface. However, the large VCU drives more LC molecules located on the IPS-electrode edge and space (s), making the obviously U-shaped (pretilt) structure.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 3 shows the normalized transmittance-VIPS (T-V) curves for the USA-IPS devices with different fabricated conditions. Four kinds of curing voltages, 2 V, 4 V, 6 V, and 8 V, are selected and applied to the 1- and 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices. Norm. T., treated by each maximum output light transmittance (Tmax), is shown on the vertical axis. In Fig. 3(a) and 3(b), there are some common phenomena and properties that are independent of the mixed monomer concentration. The threshold voltage (Vth) determined by the maximum tangent line’s slope and the Tmax driving voltage (VTmax) are gradually decreased when the applied VCU is gradually increased, which results from the alignment of the LC molecular configuration. The higher applied VCU forces the LC molecules near the IPS-electrode edge to further tilt towards the substrate surface, and the USA profile will become obvious. This reduces the value of Vth which makes the LC molecules start reorienting, indicating that the change in the LC molecular configuration is relatively easy [27] and the output light transmittance is gradually increased (VIPS > Vth) because of the accumulation of the optical phase retardation. Moreover, the value of VTmax driving the device with the maximum brightness is also reduced, suggesting that the driving potential energy can be saved due to the fact that the pre-optical phase retardation in the device is produced by the USA molecular configuration. However, once the applied VIPS is more than VTmax, the output light transmittance will be lower than the Tmax. This is because the LC molecules are further driven and aligned with respect to the direction of the IPS electric field, leading to the fact that the value of phase retardation is beyond the optimum value (0.5 π) [25, 28]. The behavior of the T-V curve at higher driving voltage (VIPS > VTmax) is related to the value of VCU. Higher VCU (≧ 6 V) causes the rapid decay of the output light transmittance when the USA-IPS device is operated at a higher VIPS value. The decay rates of the output light transmittance of these USA-IPS devices can be estimated by using a tangent line at a specific interval. In Fig. 3(a), the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device at the VCU of 2 V has the highest Vth ( = 3.42 V) and the highest VTmax ( = 12.92 V). However, as the VCU is increased to 8 V, the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device not only has the lowest Vth ( = 1.17 V) and VTmax ( = 7.98 V), but also has obvious light transmittance (leakage) in the initial (dark) state (VIPS = 0 V) [25]. Producing the larger pretilt USA LC molecular configuration can benefit the LC molecular reorientation and reduce the driving voltage, but the remarkable light leakage in the dark state and the poor switching response (as will be shown later) can also be revealed, which are adverse to the device performance [25–28]. Compared to the 1-wt.% USA-IPS devices, it can be found that the 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices possess higher VTmax, as shown in Fig. 3(b), which is attributed to the polymer anchoring effect. The higher mixed monomer concentration leads to the stronger polymer anchoring energy effect on the device, and additional electric potential energy is required to change the LC molecular configuration of the device [29, 30]. However, the slightly higher driving voltage and stronger polymer anchoring effect will benefit the response performance of the USA-IPS device, as will be shown later. In addition, for the 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices, the light leakage is revealed and the Vth is eliminated as the VCU is over 6 V. The value of the light leakage of the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device is higher than that of the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device, which is also attributed to the polymer anchoring effect on the USA LC molecular configuration. The higher mixed monomer concentration gives the device a more stable USA LC molecular configuration after the polymerization process. Thus, the USA effect on the 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices will be more remarkable than that on the 1-wt.% USA-IPS devices. The tunable electro-optical properties of the USA-IPS devices are achieved by changing the monomer concentration and VCU. Some of the electrical properties of these USA-IPS devices are summarized in Table 1.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Normalized T-V curves for the 1- and 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices with different curing voltages during the USA configuration process, are shown in (a) and (b), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Electrical properties of the USA-IPS devices with different kinds of fabrication conditions.

Figure 4 shows the normalized optical-switch responses for different types of USA-IPS devices, switched between the initial state at VIPS = 0 V and the maximum bright state at VIPS = VTmax. In the response measurement, the tr response of the device with free-light-leakage in the dark state is estimated as the optical light transmittance from 10% Tmax to 90% Tmax, whereas the tf response is estimated inversely. In Figs. 4(a) and 4(b), the tr responses of the proposed USA-IPS devices are addressed from VIPS = 0 V to VIPS = VTmax. It can be found that when the value of VCU is increased, the time for LC molecules reorienting from the dark state to the maximum bright state is increased, meaning that the tr response is slow. This phenomenon, independent of the mixed monomer concentration, is revealed in both Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). The higher VCU makes an obvious USA structure in the proposed device, but the average value of this kind of VCU-dependent pretilt structure is not very large, and its region ranges from 2° at a VCU of 2 V to 16° at a VCU of 8 V [31]. However, the value of VTmax is decreased significantly when the applied VCU is increased. Thus, the performance of tr response is dominated by the applied value of VTmax. Regarding the same USA structure, meaning that the same value of VCU is applied to the device during the polymerization process, the tr responses of 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices shown in Fig. 4 (b) are faster than those of 1-wt.% USA-IPS devices shown in Fig. 4 (b), which is related to the TA-9164 crosslinking polymer anchoring effect on the LC molecular reorientation. The increased TA-9164 crosslinking monomer concentration results in a stronger anchoring energy effect on the proposed USA-IPS devices, indicating that additional potential energy to make the LC molecules reorient is required (Vth and VTmax) as shown in Fig. 3. Since the tr response is inversely proportional to the applied value of VTmax, the fastest and slowest tr responses are revealed in the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device at VTmax of 13 V and VCU of 2 V and in the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device at VTmax of 5 V and VCU of 8 V, respectively. In addition, the initial state at VIPS of 0 V is not dark as the USA-IPS device uses the polymerization process with the value of VCU over 6 V, which can be applied to long-term and energy-saving information applications. As the VTmax is released, the performance of tf response of the USA-IPS device is only associated with the USA structure and TA-9164 monomer concentration. The obvious USA structure with the pretilt angle over 5° produced by the larger VCU (> 4 V) will reduce the tf response, meaning that the time for the driven LC molecules that reorient from the maximum-brightness state to the as-fabricated state is longer. This is attributed to the fact that no stronger recovery force can make the driven LC molecules rapidly reorient to the original configuration [25, 32]. Regarding the TA-9164 polymer anchoring effect on the tf response of the USA-IPS device, the previous research results show that the IPS-based device with the mixed monomer concentration of 1 wt.% cannot obviously improve the tf response as compared to the pure (0 wt.%) IPS-based LC devices, which is owing to the lack of a stronger polymer anchoring effect (Wan) on the driven LC molecules (tf ∝ 1/Wan) [32]. However, once the mixed concentration of TA-9164 monomer is increased to 2 wt%, the faster tf response can be carried out, which is shown in the inserted figure of Fig. 4(d). From Figs. 4(c) and 4(d), one can find that the tf responses of the 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices are superior to those of the 1-wt.% USA-IPS devices, which is due to the fact that a stronger polymer anchoring effect makes the driven LC molecules rapidly reorient to the original configuration. It is noted that the USA structure produced at VCU of 2 V does not degrade the tf response of the USA-IPS device since the polymer anchoring effect in this case is stronger than the USA effect [25]. However, when the value of VCU is increased, the effect of the USA structure on the tf response of the USA-IPS device gradually becomes more obvious, especially for the 1-wt.% USA-IPS devices with a weaker polymer anchoring effect. Of all the proposed USA-IPS devices, the fastest and lowest tf responses are revealed in the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device with the VCU of 2 V and in the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device with the VCU of 8 V, respectively. Based on the above discussion, the tunable optical-switch response of the USA-IPS device can be achieved by controlling the TA-9164 monomer concentration and the value of VCU during the polymerization process. The optical-switch responses of the proposed USA-IPS devices, including tr, tf, and the total response time (tt = tr + tf), are summarized in Table 2.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Optically switching tr/tf responses for (a)/(c) 1-wt.% and (b)/(d) 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices with different kinds of curing voltages, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 2. Optical-switch responses of the USA-IPS devices with different kinds of fabrication conditions.

To further investigate the effects of TA-9164 monomer concentration on the response performance of the proposed USA-IPS devices, the value of VCU is fixed at 2 V, and the specific gray-level tr responses from the zeroth state to each gray-level state are shown in Fig. 5(a). The gray difference between the adjacent levels is equal, and the value of the gray state labeled on the horizontal axis is from 0 to 7, meaning that the output light transmittance is from 0 to the Tmax level. Compared to the 0 wt.% USA-IPS device (also called the pure E7 LC device), the 1 wt.% and 2 wt.% USA-IPS devices show the faster gray-level tr responses for all states, which is because of the USA structure and polymer-increased driving voltage effect on the LC molecular reorientation, resulting in a smaller value of the Vth value and a rapid change in the LC molecular configuration. Of all the devices, the 2 wt.% USA-IPS devices exhibit the shortest gray-level tr, which is attributed to the stable USA structure and the highest gray-level driving voltage divided from VTmax (VTmax|2 wt.% > VTmax|1 wt.% > VTmax|0 wt.%, as shown in the inserted figure), making the LC molecules in the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device reorient rapidly. Figure 5(b) shows the specific gray-level tf responses for the different kinds of USA-IPS devices from the specific gray state to the zeroth state once the driving voltage is released. Due to the fact that the pretilt angle in the device is small, the tf response is only related to the anchoring energy effect, and the curve behavior of the tf response is almost independent of the change in the gray-level state, meaning that the gray-level tf curve is independent of the gray-level driving voltage. Of all the devices, the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device shows the shortest gray-level tf, indicating that the introduced stronger polymer anchoring effect makes the driven LC molecules reorient faster. According to the above results, the proposed USA-IPS devices not only have excellent response performance, but also have tunable electro-optical properties, which is beneficial to the design and application of the IPS-based devices.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Gray-level tr and tf responses for the different kinds of IPS-based devices, shown in (a) and (b), respectively. The VCU of the selected 1- and 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices is 2 V. The inserted T-V curve in (a) shows that the 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices at the VCU of 2 V has the largest VTmax value.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

The tunable electro-optical properties of USA-IPS devices are demonstrated and well developed by adjusting the value of VCU and the mixed concentration of TA-9164 monomer during the polymerization process. The VCU effects on the USA structure and LC molecular pretilt level are observed from the output light transmittance, POM, and conoscopic images. Through the curing process, TA-9164 crosslinking polymers change the original VA configuration and provide a stable USA configuration to the IPS-based LC devices, forming the USA-IPS devices. The Vth, VTmax, light transmittance, and optical response not only depend on the VCU, but also on the mixed monomer concentration. As the value of VCU is increased, the Vth and VTmax are decreased, which is attributed to the obvious USA structure providing a pre-direction to the LC molecules. The change in VTmax can adjust the optical response of the proposed USA-IPS device from fast to slow. Moreover, the higher mixed concentration of TA-9164 monomer, due to the introduced stronger anchoring energy effect on the LC molecular reorientation, is beneficial to the improvement in the optical response of the USA-IPS device. Of all the different kinds of devices, the fastest response is achieved in the 2-wt.% USA-IPS device under the process condition of 2-V VCU, whereas the lowest response is revealed in the 1-wt.% USA-IPS device under the process condition of 8-V VCU. This proposed fabrication method not only effectively changes the electro-optical properties of IPS-based devices, but also benefits the performance design of the information and optical system.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan (MOST 104-2221-E-027-091 and MOST 105-2221-E-027-056).

References and links

1. M. Oh-e and K. Kondo, “Electro-optical characteristics and switching behavior of the in-plane switching mode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(26), 3895–3897 (1995). [CrossRef]  

2. R. H. Guan, Y. B. Sun, and W. X. Kang, “Rubbing angle effect on in-plane switching liquid crystal displays,” Liq. Cryst. 33(7), 829–832 (2006). [CrossRef]  

3. Y. Momoi, K. Tamai, K. Furuta, T.-R. Lee, K. J. Kim, C. H. Oh, and T. Koda, “Mechanism of image sticking after long-term AC field driving of IPS mode,” J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 18(2), 134–140 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. Z. Ge, X. Zhu, T. X. Wu, and S. T. Wu, “High-transmittance in-plane-switching liquid-crystal displays using a positive-dielectric-anisotropy liquid crystal,” J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 14(11), 1031–1037 (2006). [CrossRef]  

5. M. L. Dark, M. H. Moore, D. K. Shenoy, and R. Shashidhar, “Rotational viscosity and molecular structure of nematic liquid crystals,” Liq. Cryst. 33(1), 67–73 (2006). [CrossRef]  

6. K. Kawabe, T. Furuhashi, and Y. Tanaka, “New TFT-LCD driving method for improved moving picture quality,” SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 32(1), 998–1001 (2001). [CrossRef]  

7. S. H. Lee, H. Y. Kim, I. C. Park, B. G. Rho, J. S. Park, H. S. Park, and C. H. Lee, “Rubbing-free, vertically aligned nematic liquid crystal display controlled by in-plane field,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 71(19), 2851–2853 (1997). [CrossRef]  

8. Y. J. Lee, J. S. Gwag, Y. K. Kim, S. I. Jo, S. G. Kang, Y. R. Park, and J. H. Kim, “Control of liquid crystal pretilt angle by anchoring competition of the stacked alignment layers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 94(4), 041113 (2009). [CrossRef]  

9. G. M. Wu, H. W. Chien, J. W. Huang, and H. L. Zeng, “Intermediate pre-tilt angle control by a composite alignment thin film structure for liquid crystal displays,” Nanotechnology 21(13), 134022 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. S. J. Hwang, S. C. Jeng, and I. M. Hsieh, “Nanoparticle-doped polyimide for controlling the pretilt angle of liquid crystals devices,” Opt. Express 18(16), 16507–16512 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. M. Lu, K. H. Yang, T. Nakasogi, and S. J. Chey, “Homeotropic alignment by single oblique evaporation of SiO2 and its application to high resolution microdisplays,” SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap., 29, 446–449 (2000).

12. F. K. Lee, B. Zhang, P. Sheng, O. K. C. Tsui, and H. S. Kwok, “Continuous liquid crystal pretilt control through textured substrates,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(23), 5556–5558 (2004). [CrossRef]  

13. D. Ahn, Y. C. Jeong, S. Lee, J. Lee, Y. Heo, and J. K. Park, “Control of liquid crystal pretilt angles by using organic/inorganic hybrid interpenetrating networks,” Opt. Express 17(19), 16603–16612 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. K. Hanaoka, Y. Nakanishi, Y. Inoue, S. Tanuma, Y. Koike, and K. Okamoto, “A new MVA-LCD by polymer sustained alignment technology,” SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 35(1), 1200–1203 (2004). [CrossRef]  

15. S. G. Kim, S. M. Kim, Y. S. Kim, H. K. Lee, S. H. Lee, G. D. Lee, J. J. Lyu, and K. H. Kim, “Stabilization of the liquid crystal director in the patterned vertical alignment mode through formation of pretilt angle by reactive mesogen,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(26), 261910 (2007). [CrossRef]  

16. S. H. Lee, S. M. Kim, and S. T. Wu, “Review Paper: Emerging vertical-alignment liquid-crystal technology associated with surface modification using UV-curable monomer,” J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 17(7), 551–559 (2009). [CrossRef]  

17. S. M. Kim, I. Y. Cho, W. Kim, K. U. Jeong, S. H. Lee, G. D. Lee, J. Son, J. J. Lyu, and K. H. Kim, “Surface-modification on vertical alignment layer using UV-curable reactive mesogens,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48(33R), 032405 (2009). [CrossRef]  

18. J. J. Lyu, H. Kikuchi, D. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, K. H. Kim, H. Higuchi, and S. H. Lee, “Phase separation of monomer in liquid crystal mixtures and surface morphology in polymer stabilized vertical alignment liquid crystal displays,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 44(32), 325104 (2011). [CrossRef]  

19. S. H. Lim, D. H. Kim, S. J. Shin, W. C. Woo, H. S. Jin, S. H. Lee, E. Y. Kim, and S. E. Lee, “Polymer Stabilized In-Plane Field Driven Vertical Alignment Liquid Crystal Device,” SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 42(1), 1645–1647 (2011). [CrossRef]  

20. S. H. Kim and L. C. Chien, “Electro-optical characteristics and morphology of a bend nematic liquid crystal device having templated polymer fibrils,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43(11A), 7643–7647 (2004). [CrossRef]  

21. S. W. Kang, Y. E. Choi, B. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, S. Kundu, H. S. Jin, Y. K. Yun, S. H. Lee, and L. Komitov, “Surface polymer-stabilised in-plane field driven vertical alignment liquid crystal device,” Liq. Cryst. 41(4), 552–557 (2013). [CrossRef]  

22. Y. J. Lim, Y. E. Choi, J. H. Lee, G. D. Lee, L. Komitov, and S. H. Lee, “Effects of three-dimensional polymer networks in vertical alignment liquid crystal display controlled by in-plane field,” Opt. Express 22(9), 10634–10641 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. G. J. Lin, T. J. Chen, B. Y. Chen, J. J. Wu, and Y. J. Yang, “Enhanced electro-optical properties of vertically aligned in-plane-switching liquid crystal displays employing polymer networks,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(8), 1657–1667 (2014). [CrossRef]  

24. T. J. Chen, G. J. Lin, B. Y. Chen, J. J. Wu, and Y. J. Yang, “Optimized electro-optical properties of polymer-stabilized vertical-aligned liquid crystal displays driven by an in-plane field,” Displays 37, 94–99 (2015). [CrossRef]  

25. G. J. Lin, T. J. Chen, Y. W. Tsai, Y. T. Lin, J. J. Wu, and Y. J. Yang, “Performance enhancement using a non-uniform vertical electric field and polymer networks for in-plane switching of multi-pretilt, vertically aligned liquid crystal devices,” Opt. Lett. 39(21), 6225–6228 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. G. J. Lin, T. J. Chen, Y. W. Tsai, and J. J. Wu, “Effects of U-shaped alignment and surface-anchored polymer morphology on the electro-optical properties of in-plane-switching vertically aligned liquid crystal devices,” Opt. Mater. Express 6(9), 3008–3019 (2016). [CrossRef]  

27. X. Nie, H. Xianyu, R. Lu, T. X. Wu, and S. T. Wu, “Pretilt angle effects on liquid crystal response time,” J. Disp. Technol. 3(3), 280–283 (2007). [CrossRef]  

28. G. J. Lin, T. J. Chen, M. J. Lee, J. J. Wu, K. Y. Lai, and Y. J. Yang, “Effect of cross-linking polymer networks on the molecular reorientation and electro-optical performance of in-plane switching vertically aligned liquid crystal devices,” J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 53(16), 1123–1130 (2015).

29. X. Nie, Y. H. Lin, T. X. Wu, H. Wang, Z. Ge, and S. T. Wu, “Polar anchoring energy measurement of vertically aligned liquid-crystal cells,” J. Appl. Phys. 98(1), 013516 (2005). [CrossRef]  

30. A. Murauski, V. Chigrinov, A. Muravsky, F. S. Y. Yeung, J. Ho, and H. S. Kwok, “Determination of liquid-crystal polar anchoring energy by electrical measurements,” Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 71(6 Pt 1), 061707 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. G. Baur, V. Wittwer, and D. W. Berreman, “Determination of the tilt angles at surfaces of substrates in liquid crystal cells,” Phys. Lett. 56(2), 142–144 (1976). 720) Liquid-crystal devices. [CrossRef]  

32. X. Nie, R. Lu, H. Xianyu, T. X. Wu, and S. T. Wu, “Anchoring energy and cell gap effects on liquid crystal response time,” J. Appl. Phys. 101(10), 103110 (2007). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic illustrations of the fabrication process of USA (pretilt) configuration and LC molecular orientation for a USA-IPS device. Step 1 shows that the V-PI is coated on the ITO and IPS substrate surfaces. The processed substrates are baked at 200 °C for 1 hr as shown in Step 2. Step 3 shows the UV curing process by applying the TA-9164 monomer, VCU and UV light to the pure VA-IPS LC device. The induced U-shaped curing electric field is shown with dashed lines. Step 4 shows the LC molecular reorientation when the IPS electric field induced by VIPS is applied to the fabricated USA-IPS LC/polymer device. The inserted SEM image shows the crosslinking morphology of TA-9164 polymers on the substrate surface.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) T-V curve for the pure E7 LC device in the presence of different curing voltages. The inserted POM and conoscopic images show the VCU-dependent brightness and pretilt configuration of the pure E7 LC device. As the VCU is increased, the reticle, labeled by the red line in the conoscopic image at a VCU of 0 V, will be distorted and eliminated. (b) and (c) effect of the small and large VCU on the LC molecular configuration, respectively. The small VCU makes the small U-shaped (pretilt) structure, and most LC molecules are vertically aligned and perpendicular to the substrate surface. However, the large VCU drives more LC molecules located on the IPS-electrode edge and space (s), making the obviously U-shaped (pretilt) structure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Normalized T-V curves for the 1- and 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices with different curing voltages during the USA configuration process, are shown in (a) and (b), respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Optically switching tr/tf responses for (a)/(c) 1-wt.% and (b)/(d) 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices with different kinds of curing voltages, respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Gray-level tr and tf responses for the different kinds of IPS-based devices, shown in (a) and (b), respectively. The VCU of the selected 1- and 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices is 2 V. The inserted T-V curve in (a) shows that the 2-wt.% USA-IPS devices at the VCU of 2 V has the largest VTmax value.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Electrical properties of the USA-IPS devices with different kinds of fabrication conditions.

Tables Icon

Table 2 Optical-switch responses of the USA-IPS devices with different kinds of fabrication conditions.

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.