Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Atmospheric CH4 and N2O measurements near Greater Houston area landfills using a QCL-based QEPAS sensor system during DISCOVER-AQ 2013

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A quartz-enhanced photoacoustic absorption spectroscopy (QEPAS)-based gas sensor was developed for methane (CH4) and nitrous-oxide (N2O) detection. The QEPAS-based sensor was installed in a mobile laboratory operated by Aerodyne Research, Inc. to perform atmospheric CH4 and N2O detection around two urban waste-disposal sites located in the northeastern part of the Greater Houston area, during DISCOVER-AQ, a NASA Earth Venture during September 2013. A continuous wave, thermoelectrically cooled, 158 mW distributed feedback quantum cascade laser emitting at 7.83 μm was used as the excitation source in the QEPAS gas sensor system. Compared to typical ambient atmospheric mixing ratios of CH4 and N2O of 1.8 ppmv and 323 ppbv, respectively, significant increases in mixing ratios were observed when the mobile laboratory was circling two waste-disposal sites in Harris County and when waste disposal trucks were encountered.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

Atmospheric CH4 and N2O mixing ratios were measured during the September 2013 Houston-based NASA field campaign DISCOVER-AQ (Deriving Information on Surface Conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations Relevant to Air Quality, www.discover-aq.larc.nasa.gov/science.php). These gases play a major role in global warming, with 100-year time horizon global warming potentials of 25 (CH4) and 298 (N2O) [1,2]. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, landfills constitute the third largest source of CH4 emission in the United States, while N2O emissions are mainly associated with agricultural soil management [3]. Limited measurements of N2O have been reported in landfill areas. Hence N2O emission measurements as a function of the environmental conditions within a landfill site and of the nitrogen content of the waste being disposed are needed [4].

During the last 10 years, different techniques, such as tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy [5,6], photoacoustic absorption spectroscopy [7], and cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy [8] were employed for CH4 and N2O detection. In this work, we used the quartz-enhanced photoacoustic (QEPAS) technique to perform atmospheric measurements of these two targeted trace gas species. QEPAS has been used since 2002 to detect, with high sensitivity and selectivity, numerous trace gas species with absorption lines in the mid-infrared range [919]. The QEPAS-based sensor system uses a 7.83 μm continuous wave (CW), thermoelectrically cooled (TEC) distributed feedback (DFB) quantum cascade laser (QCL) (AdTech Optics, Part No. HHL-12-25), with an output power of 158 mW. A commercial quartz tuning fork (QTF) with a resonant frequency (f0) of 32.768 kHz and a high-quality factor of 104 at atmospheric pressure is employed as a resonant transducer in our QEPAS sensor. The emitted QCL beam is modulated at half of the QTF resonant frequency (f=f0/2) in order to perform second-harmonic (2f) detection for sensitive CH4 and N2O concentration measurements [20]. The interaction between the QCL modulated beam and a trace gas leads to the generation of acoustic waves that mechanically bend the QTF prongs. Hence the electrode pairs of the QTF will be electrically charged due to the quartz piezoelectricity. The QTF electrical response is acquired via a transimpedance amplifier with a feedback resistor of 10 MΩ. In addition, the QEPAS signal can be enhanced 10 times by adding to the QTF sensor architecture a micro-resonator composed of two tubes that are placed at both sides of the QTF. The dimensions of the tubes, length and inner diameter, have been optimized experimentally [21].

The developed QEPAS sensor was installed in the Aerodyne Research, Inc. mobile laboratory (AML) in order to perform CH4 and N2O atmospheric concentration measurements. The specific characteristics of the AML and its previous monitoring activities are described elsewhere [22]. Considering the importance of CH4 emissions from landfills and the potential of N2O generation from these waste-disposal sites, the mixing ratios of these gas species around two urban solid waste disposal sites in the Greater Houston, Texas, area (WM Atascocita and BFI McCarty landfills) were monitored. The results of this study are described in this manuscript.

The schematic of the QEPAS sensor is depicted in Fig. 1. The optical characterizations of the 7.83 μm CW TEC DFB-QCL and the QEPAS sensor setup used for this campaign were described in detail elsewhere [23]. Moreover, sensor properties, such as sensitivity, selectivity, linearity, and stability also were demonstrated [23].

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. CH4 and N2O QEPAS sensor schematic. Ge Pc L and ZnSe Pc L, germanium and zinc selenide planoconvex lenses; Ph, pinhole; M, mirror; QTF, quartz tuning fork; μR, acoustic microresonator; RC, reference cell; PD, pyroelectric-detector; CEU, control electronics unit for the QEPAS based sensor system.

Download Full Size | PDF

A water-cooling system and a high-capacity cup mount (dB Engineering, Inc.; slm 1A) were added to the QEPAS sensor in order to maintain the QCL temperature at 21.5°C (temperature in the AML van ranged between 26°C and 34°C) and to isolate the system from vibrations induced by road bumps, respectively. Two urban solid-waste disposal sites, WM Atascocita and BFI McCarty landfills, were selected to perform atmospheric CH4 and N2O measurements on three dates: September 7, 10, and 26, 2013. During these measurements, the wind direction was predominantly east–northeast with an average wind speed of 3 mph. The starting point of the AML was Channelview, Texas, which is located in the eastern part of the Greater Houston area. First, all the sensor parameters, shown in Table 1, were set in order to determine and optimize the 2f QEPAS sensor signal. Atmospheric CH4 or N2O measurements started when the AML van approached a specific landfill site (i.e., WM Atascocita or BFI McCarty) and continued as the AML circled the landfill and stopped at several arbitrary locations along its perimeter.

Tables Icon

Table 1. CH4 and N2O QEPAS Sensor Parameters

The targeted CH4 and N2O absorption lines are located at 1275.04cm1 and 1275.49cm1, respectively. In this wavenumber range, the CH4 and N2O absorption line strengths are weak [SCH4=3.729×1020cm1/(molecule/cm2), SN2O=1.407×1019cm1/(molecule/cm2)]. However, employing an intense (>120mW) laser excitation source in the QEPAS sensor system, such as a 7.83 μm CW TEC DFB-QCL, leads to excellent minimum detection limits (1σ) of 13 ppbv for CH4 and 6 ppbv for N2O, respectively, as reported previously [23]. Figure 2 depicts atmospheric CH4 and N2O 2f QEPAS signals with a 1 s averaging time at the AML Channelview starting point. These signals are optimized, prior to beginning continuous measurements, in terms of the QTF calibration (f0 and Q), amplitude of modulation, and current scanning range by using the control electronics unit (CEU) and an internally developed LabView program, respectively. After the optimization step, we performed CH4 or N2O continuous measurements in a 3f line-locking mode. This mode is activated by integrating into our QEPAS sensor setup a 5 cm long reference cell (Wavelength Reference, Inc.) filled with a calibrated content of 0.5% CH4 and 1% N2O at 100 Torr and a pyroelectric detector. The CH4 and N2O 2f QEPAS signal amplitudes depicted in Fig. 2 correspond to 1.8 ppmv and 323 ppbv concentrations, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. 2f QEPAS signal of atmospheric CH4 and N2O at Channelview (starting point of AML field trip measurements) for CH4 on September 7, 2013, and for N2O on September 26, 2013. The pressure inside the ADM of the QEPAS-based sensor was set to P=130Torr.

Download Full Size | PDF

During in situ monitoring of CH4 and N2O, it is feasible to verify the QEPAS measured concentrations by comparing them with values measured by the AML van-based “QCL mini monitor” multipass optical sensor with a CH4 detection sensitivity of 0.3 ppbv and N2O detection sensitivity of 0.060 ppbv, both in 1 s [24]. The two types of sensors yield the same CH4 and N2O concentrations within <5% difference, thus verifying the precision and stability of the reported QEPAS sensor.

On September 7, 2013, atmospheric CH4 measurements at and around the WM Atascocita landfill were carried out. These measurements were performed from 12:00 to 16:28 pm central daylight time (CDT) as shown in Fig 3. The CH4 mixing ratio remained stable at 1.8 ppmv, until the AML van approached the WM Atascocita, Texas, landfill at 14:10pm, when a CH4 plume of 10 ppmv was detected.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. CH4 mixing ratios at and around the WM Atascocita, Texas 77396 landfill on September 7, 2013.

Download Full Size | PDF

The highest CH4 plumes (mixing ratios of 53, 14, and 25 ppmv) were generated by waste trucks passing close to the AML. The second AML trip, shown in Fig. 4, started by first optimizing the QEPAS sensor system parameters and subsequently performing atmospheric CH4 measurements at and around the BFI McCarty landfill, Texas, 77078 on September 10, 2013. These measurements were performed between 8am and noon CDT.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. CH4 mixing ratios around the BFI McCarty landfill, Texas 77078 on September 10, 2013.

Download Full Size | PDF

The average CH4 mixing ratio detected near the BFI McCarty landfill was 5ppmv based on averaging over measurements from 10:10 am until 11:40 am, while the highest mixing ratios observed, 16  and 27 ppmv, were related to waste trucks passing near the AML.

The third AML trip, shown in Fig. 5, was based on monitoring atmospheric N2O levels in the atmosphere around the BFI McCarty landfill on September 26, 2013.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. N2O mixing ratios at and around the BFI McCarty landfill on September 26, 2013.

Download Full Size | PDF

The measurements were performed between 10:15 am and 12:00 pm CDT. The N2O level remained stable at its natural abundance near 323 ppbv. However, when waste trucks passed close to the AML at two different times, 10:37 and 10:52 am, two spikes of N2O were observed clearly, corresponding to 333 and 336 ppbv, respectively.

Furthermore, mixing ratios of approximately 350 ppbv of N2O were detected while the AML was circling the landfill from 11:22 to 11:32 am.

In this study, we demonstrated the performance of a mid-infrared QCL-based QEPAS sensor system installed in the AML to perform continuous, atmospheric CH4 and N2O measurements at and around two urban waste landfills, BFI McCarty and Atascocita, located in the northeastern part of Greater Houston. QEPAS allows performance of sensitive measurements in a very small (few mm3) gas sample, which is suitable for applications requiring a compact, lightweight, and low-cost sensor architecture. The sensor system employed a 7.83 μm CW TEC 158 mW DFB-QCL as an excitation source. 2f and 3f harmonic detection was used for optimum sensor sensitivity and line-locking operation mode, respectively. The QEPAS sensor measurements were verified by comparing them with values observed by an ARI ultra-sensitive QCL-based multipass gas cell sensor system [24]. Enhancements of 8ppmv of CH4 and 30ppbv of N2O compared to their natural abundances were detected when the AML was next to the landfills or circling them at a distance of 200m. Due to dilution, mixing ratios decreased to background levels when the circling distance exceeded 400m. Furthermore, the sensor clearly detected enhanced CH4 and N2O as a result of waste trucks driving close to the AML. An ultracompact QCL-based QEPAS CH4 and N2O sensor system is planned and will be based on integrating novel surface-mounted digital electronics in order to reduce the size of the sensor system. In addition, the data-acquisition system and the QCL controllers will be designed so as to allow the simultaneous detection of atmospheric CH4 and N2O.

The Rice University group acknowledges financial support from a National Science Foundation (NSF) ERC MIRTHE award, a NSF-ANR award for international collaboration in chemistry, “Next Generation of Compact Infrared Laser Based Sensor for Environmental Monitoring (NexCILAS),” and the Robert Welch Foundation grant C-0586 and Dr. C. Bauer, TESTO AG, 79853 Lenzkirch, Germany, for the loan of the AdTech Optics 7.83 μm CW DFB QCL. P. Patimisco and V. Spagnolo acknowledge financial support from three Italian research projects: PON01 02238, PON02 00675 and PON02 00576.

References

1. Intergovernmental Panel in Climate Change (IPCC), “Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” (2007).

2. B. Galle, J. Samuelsson, B. H. Svensson, and G. Börjesson, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 21 (2001). [CrossRef]  

3. United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks” (1990–2011).

4. J. Rinne, M. Pihlatie, A. Lohila, T. Thum, M. Aurela, J.-P. Tuovinen, T. Laurila, and T. Vesala, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 7790 (2005). [CrossRef]  

5. P. C. Castillo, I. Sydoryk, B. Gross, and F. Moshary, Proc. SPIE 8718, 87180J (2013). [CrossRef]  

6. J. J. Scherer, J. B. Paul, H. J. Jost, and M. L. Fischer, Appl. Phys. B 110, 271 (2013). [CrossRef]  

7. J. P. Lima, H. Vargas, A. Miklós, M. Angelmahr, and P. Hess, Appl. Phys. B 85, 279 (2006). [CrossRef]  

8. J. Wojtas, Z. Bielecki, T. Stacewicz, J. Mikolajczyk, B. Rutecka, and R. Medrzycki, Acta Phys. Pol. A 124, 592 (2013). [CrossRef]  

9. A. A. Kosterev, Y. A. Bakhirkin, R. F. Curl, and F. K. Tittel, Opt. Lett. 27, 1902 (2002). [CrossRef]  

10. R. F. Curl, F. Capasso, C. Gmachl, A. A. Kosterev, B. McManus, R. Lewicki, M. Pusharsky, G. Wysocki, and F. K. Tittel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 487, 1 (2010). [CrossRef]  

11. Y. Ma, R. Lewicki, M. Razeghi, and F. K. Tittel, Opt. Express 21, 1008 (2013). [CrossRef]  

12. L. Dong, V. Spagnolo, R. Lewicki, and F. K. Tittel, Opt. Express 19, 24037 (2011). [CrossRef]  

13. L. Dong, J. Wright, B. Peters, B. A. Ferguson, F. K. Tittel, and S. McWhorter, Appl. Phys. B 107, 459 (2012). [CrossRef]  

14. L. Dong, A. A. Kosterev, D. Thomazy, and F. K. Tittel, Proc. SPIE 7945, 79450R (2011). [CrossRef]  

15. A. A. Kosterev, L. Dong, D. Thomazy, F. K. Tittel, and S. Overby, Appl. Phys. B 101, 649 (2010). [CrossRef]  

16. A. A. Kosterev, P. R. Buerki, L. Dong, M. Reed, T. Day, and F. K. Tittel, Appl. Phys. B 100, 173 (2010). [CrossRef]  

17. M. Jahjah, A. Vicet, and Y. Rouillard, Appl. Phys. B 106, 483 (2012). [CrossRef]  

18. M. Jahjah, S. Moumdji, O. Gauthier-Lafaye, S. Bonnefont, Y. Rouillard, and A. Vicet, Electron. Lett. 48, 277 (2012). [CrossRef]  

19. V. Spagnolo, P. Patimisco, S. Borri, G. Scamarcio, B. E. Bernacki, and J. Kriesel, Opt. Lett. 37, 4461 (2012). [CrossRef]  

20. M. Jahjah, S. Belahsene, L. Nähle, M. Fischer, J. Koeth, Y. Rouillard, and A. Vicet, Opt. Lett. 37, 2502 (2012). [CrossRef]  

21. L. Dong, A. A. Kosterev, D. Thomazy, and F. K. Tittel, Appl. Phys. B 100, 627 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. P. Massoli, E. C. Fortner, M. R. Canagaratna, L. R. Williams, Q. Zhang, Y. Sun, J. J. Schwab, A. Trimborn, T. B. Onasch, K. L. Demerjian, C. E. Kolb, D. R. Worsnop, and J. T. Jayne, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46, 1201 (2012). [CrossRef]  

23. M. Jahjah, W. Ren, P. Stefanski, R. Lewicki, J. Zhang, W. Jiang, J. Tarkaab, and F. K. Tittel, “A compact QCL based methane and nitrous oxide sensor for environmental and medical applications,” Analyst, doi: 10.1039/C3AN01452E (2013) [CrossRef]  .

24. http://www.aerodyne.com/products/quantum-cascade-laser-mini-monitor.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. CH4 and N2O QEPAS sensor schematic. Ge Pc L and ZnSe Pc L, germanium and zinc selenide planoconvex lenses; Ph, pinhole; M, mirror; QTF, quartz tuning fork; μR, acoustic microresonator; RC, reference cell; PD, pyroelectric-detector; CEU, control electronics unit for the QEPAS based sensor system.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. 2f QEPAS signal of atmospheric CH4 and N2O at Channelview (starting point of AML field trip measurements) for CH4 on September 7, 2013, and for N2O on September 26, 2013. The pressure inside the ADM of the QEPAS-based sensor was set to P=130Torr.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. CH4 mixing ratios at and around the WM Atascocita, Texas 77396 landfill on September 7, 2013.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. CH4 mixing ratios around the BFI McCarty landfill, Texas 77078 on September 10, 2013.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. N2O mixing ratios at and around the BFI McCarty landfill on September 26, 2013.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1. CH4 and N2O QEPAS Sensor Parameters

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.