Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Real-time optical time interpolation using spectral interferometry

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A simple scheme for all-optical time interpolation using spectral interferometry is put forward that is, in principle, capable of single-shot measurements. In this method, the arrival time of optical timing pulses is encoded into the spectrum of a time-stretched supercontinuum via cross phase modulation. The proof-of-concept test setup points toward femtosecond-level absolute timing capabilities with only minor additions to modern optical clockwork.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Introduction. Time interval counters (or event timers) and frequency counters are vital instruments in several fields of science, including time and frequency metrology, geodesy, astronomy, as well as materials, nuclear, and particle physics. High-resolution instruments rely on time interpolation, which enables the triggering time to be interpolated in between cycles of the reference clock, thereby increasing the resolution by several orders of magnitude. Many different schemes for realizing electrical time interpolation have been put forward over the years [1], and with careful design, a single-shot precision of approximately 1 ps is possible (e.g., [2]).

For the last two decades, time and frequency metrology has been moving from the electrical domain to the optical domain: optical frequency standards have been realized with fractional frequency uncertainty estimates at the 10$^{-18}$ level and optical clockwork (frequency combs) enable frequency measurements at the 20th decimal place. With these developments, all optical time-interpolation becomes a relevant issue.

Dual-comb asynchronous optical sampling [3] has turned out to be a very powerful spectroscopic technique where a pulse train with a slightly detuned repetition rate ($f_{r} + \Delta f$) is scanned across the signal pulses ($f_r$) on a photodetector and processed. This effectively stretches the time between the pulses ($1/f_r$) to the measurement time ($1/\Delta f$) with an effective sampling time of $\Delta t=\Delta f/(f_r (f_r + \Delta f)$. This allows for extremely high temporal resolution provided sufficient coherence can be maintained between the pulse trains. Recently, dual-comb techniques have been used for high-precision time transfer demonstrations over a 4-km free-space link [4] and a 114-km optical fiber link [5].

An elegant real-time approach for high-resolution measurements of optical waveforms is temporal imaging (magnification) using a time lens (e.g., [68]). A somewhat related approach is photonic time stretching, which enables high-resolution measurements of electrical signals [9].

According to [10], the first attempt to make a real-time optical measurement of an ultrafast process was made in [11], where pulses from a 70-fs mode-locked dye laser were stretched in an optical fiber to 300 ps and passed through an electro-optical modulator placed between two crossed polarizers. Consequently, the time-dependent electrical signal was encoded into the optical spectrum. In [12] this approach was applied to transient absorption and in [13] to traveling THz waves. Introduction of a reference pulse either temporally or spatially separated from the probe pulse [1418] enables, under certain restrictions [19] using Fourier-transform-based fringe pattern analysis, the temporal reconstruction of the phase perturbation. In the present work, the objective is to cover a much longer time span (nanoseconds), which means that spectral fringes cannot be resolved and the temporal phase perturbation cannot be reconstructed. Nevertheless, the effective temporal position of the perturbation can be determined with high precision as shown below also without the use of a separate supercontinuum pulse for phase referencing.

The method works as follows. A supercontinuum is dispersively stretched over the time interval to be measured and combined, in, e.g., a nonlinear waveguide, with short optical timing reference pulses and the pulse or pulses to be measured. Figure 1 depicts a single period of the continuous process with a supercontinuum that stretches across the pulse period. The timing pulses have to have high enough peak power and/or the interaction length has to be long enough so that measurable nonlinear phase shifts to the supercontinuum occur via cross phase modulation (XPM). As will be shown below, XPM will produce fringes that have an easily identifiable ‘center’, the wavelength of which can be converted to time via the (calibrated) chirp of the supercontinuum.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Illustration of optical time interpolation in between time marker pulses from a mode-locked laser. The moment of time is encoded into the spectrum of a time-stretched supercontinuum via cross phase modulation.

Download Full Size | PDF

Theoretical aspects. To gain insight, let the complex field of the time-stretched supercontinuum (sc) be $E_{nl}(t)=A_{sc}(t)e^{i\phi _{sc}(t) + i\phi _{nl}(t)}$, where $\phi _{nl}(t)$ is the nonlinear phase acquired due to XPM by a timing pulse $E_p(t)$. If $\phi _{nl}(t)\ll 1$, then $E_{nl}(t)\approx A_{sc}(t)e^{i\phi _{sc}(t)} (1 + i\phi _{nl}(t))$. If the interaction is assumed short (no walk-off) and the reference timing pulse is assumed Gaussian $E_p(t)=A_{p}e^{-\alpha _p^2 (t-t_0)^2}$, then the spectrum becomes

$$|E_{nl}(\omega)|^2 \approx |E_{sc}(\omega)|^2 + \eta E_{sc}(\omega) e^{-\frac{\Delta\omega^2}{4\alpha_p^2}-i\pi/2} + c.c.,$$
where $\eta =A_{sc}(t_0)\phi ^{max}_{nl}\sqrt {\pi }\alpha _p^{-1}$. After subtracting the supercontinuum spectrum (without XPM), dividing by its square root and neglecting a contribution from the chirp of the supercontinuum, which for the present experimental parameters is tiny, the signal $S$ becomes
$$S = \frac{|E_{nl}(\omega)|^2-|E_{sc}(\omega)|^2}{\sqrt{|E_{sc}(\omega)|^2}}=2\eta \textrm{cos}(\frac{\beta_2 L}{2} \Delta\omega^2 + \frac{\pi}{4})e^{-\frac{\Delta\omega^2}{4\alpha_p^2}},$$
where $\beta _2 L$ is the group-delay dispersion. Thus, the width of the modulation is set by the bandwidth of the timing pulse (assumed smaller than the supercontinuum) and the modulation phase increases proportional to $\Delta \omega ^2$. In practice, the range of visibility of the fringes will be limited by the resolution of the spectrometer. The resulting temporal phase of the scenario above is depicted by the dotted line in Fig. 2(a), which shows a small Gaussian phase shift at $t=0$ on top of the quadratic phase profile of the chirped supercontinuum; however, in practice, it is desirable to have $\phi ^{max}_{nl}\approx 1$, and if the interaction takes place over an extended length, as in this work (solid line), considerable ‘stretching’ of the phase shift will take place due to group velocity mismatch (pulse walk-off). Numerical integration [20] with parameters corresponding to the setup described in the next section, results in the XPM signal shown in Fig. 2(b) (bottom line), which is in good agreement with the experimental trace with only the vertical scaling as a free parameter. Here the fringe visibility is limited by the 0.2-nm resolution of the spectrometer.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Nonlinear phase shifts induced by cross phase modulation on the chirped supercontinuum for different interaction lengths. (b) Example of experimental (top) and numerical (bottom) XPM signal.

Download Full Size | PDF

Experiment. The test setup is shown in Fig. 3. The near-infrared supercontinuum from a frequency-doubled 100-MHz frequency comb is time-stretched in a 54-m polarization-maintaining fiber (PM780) and focused into a 5-cm-long photonic crystal fiber (PCF; PM-1550, NKT Photonics) along with the fundamental pulse train at 1560 nm picked off after the amplifier. A compact, low-cost spectrometer (Thorlabs CCS175) with a $\sim 0.2$-nm resolution (at 850 nm) was used to record spectra. A translation stage (TS) was used to vary the temporal overlap between the pulses and a beam chopper (BC) enabled the recording of reference spectra. The laser is mode-locked by nonlinear polarization rotation, and fiber squeezers are used to adjust the mode-locked state and also the amount of light in the two branches. This, along with drifts in the free-space sections, causes the supercontinuum spectrum to drift from day to day. Figure 4(a) shows two reference spectra recorded on different days, and Figs. 4(b)–4(d) show the XPM signal corresponding to the colored markers in Fig. 4(a). The spectrometer saturated at integration times longer than approximately 1 ms. Nevertheless, the XPM signal at 752 nm was recorded with a 4-ms integration time to make it clearer. These traces were obtained by first recording a reference spectrum and then, immediately afterwards, the XPM signal spectrum, subtracting these two, and finally also subtracting a low-pass filtered copy. This last step was needed since the chopper, while being ‘low-noise’, still caused some mechanical disturbance that shifted the spectra slightly, causing a modulation on the trace. Finally, the position of the peaks was determined by a 5-point Gaussian fit.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Experimental setup. MLL, mode-locked laser; EDFA, Erbium-doped fiber amplifier; SHG, second-harmonic generation; PCF, photonic crystal fiber; BC, beam chopper; FS, PM-fiber spool; TS, translation stage; PS, piezo stretcher; PI, proportional-integral controller; PD, photodiode; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a) Example spectra of the supercontinua used in this work and (b)–(d) the corresponding XPM signals obtained at the positions marked with circles in panel (a). The OSA integration time is also given.

Download Full Size | PDF

During longer measurement times, a clear drift in the peak positions could be seen (blue trace in Fig. 5). An obvious culprit is the long delay line. To verify this, a small part of the supercontinuum was split off before and after the delay line. After spectral filtering, interference was observed on a photodetector allowing a proportional-integral controller to stabilize the delay via a fiber stretcher (gray box in Fig. 3). The yellow trace in Fig. 5 shows a clear reduction in the drift when feedback was on. It should be noted that in the current setup, this still leaves several meters of unstabilized beam paths inside the frequency comb.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Measured timing phase at 848 nm with (bottom) and without (top) active stabilization of the fiber delay line.

Download Full Size | PDF

Results. A false-color plot of the normalized XPM signal as the delay is scanned across the supercontinuum spectrum is shown in Fig. 6(a). In this scan, the integration time was kept constant at 500 $\mathrm{\mu}$s during the entire scan, which explains the poor signal to noise at the lower wavelengths. Figure 6(b) shows a single spectrum (bottom) with the XPM signal clearly visible at 860 nm. The right $y$-axis shows the relation between time delay as deduced from the position of the delay stage and the XPM signal peak wavelength.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. (a) Pseudo-color plot of the XPM signal as the delay is scanned manually across the supercontinuum. (b) Spectrum (bottom) where the XPM signal is visible at 860 nm. The top line shows the delay dependence.

Download Full Size | PDF

What is really of interest is the timing of the pulse to be measured with respect to a reference pulse, in which case, the supercontinuum is only used for interpolation and the slow drift seen in Fig. 5 (top trace) becomes irrelevant. In this work, such a full system was not yet available, but an indication of the potential performance can be obtained by studying the time instability of a single reference pulse with respect to the supercontinuum.

Timing instability is usually characterized by the time deviation (TDEV) defined via the modified Allan deviation (mod $\sigma _y(\tau ))$. The tricky thing here is that $\sigma _y(\tau )$ requires dead-time-free data but the readout rate of the OSA was only 12 Hz and the integration time was approximately 1 ms, giving a dead time to integration time ratio of $\sim 80$. While dead time contribution to $\sigma _y(\tau )$ can be taken into account via the $B_2$ and $B_3$ bias functions [21] and while mod $\sigma _y(\tau )$ can be computed from $\sigma _y(\tau )$ [22], the results are prone to significant errors due to the sensitive dependence on the noise model particularly for large multiples of the sampling time $\tau _0$. Nevertheless, Fig. 7(a) shows a best estimate for the dead-time-corrected TDEV for three different wavelengths where the program Stable32 was used to obtain the noise models: a white phase noise model was used for small $\tau$ and flicker phase for large $\tau$. To add confidence, Fig. 7(b) shows the jitter defined as the standard deviation of the difference between consecutive phase readings that have been averaged over time $\tau$ ignoring dead time and that have been normalized by $\sqrt {2}$. At 814 nm (second curve from top) and 845 nm (bottom curve), the jitter seems to level off at 4–5 fs; however, when the delay line is actively stabilized (third curve from the top), the jitter so defined keeps falling towards the 1-fs level.

 figure: Fig. 7.

Fig. 7. (a) Time deviation with dead time. See text for details. (b) Differential jitter as defined in the main text. Lines from top to bottom, 752, 814, 848, 845 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

When reference timing pulses are used, as depicted in Fig. 1, the temporal drift of the stretched supercontinuum is subtracted out, that is, active stabilization is not needed in a ‘full’ setup. Other positive properties include insensitivity to power and pulse duration fluctuations. A negative feature is the fact that since the pulses are not temporally resolved, the pulse shapes do affect the readings. If the temporal shape of the timing pulses can be fully characterized, then numerical modeling can, of course, be used to correct the absolute timing. Ultrafast pulses can have very complicated shapes, but nevertheless, to gain some insight, Fig. 8 shows the change in timing for generalized Gaussian [23] pulse shapes (FWHM 200 fs) as the skew parameter $\kappa$ is varied. In this case, the time shift ($t_{\textrm {shift}}$) is roughly half the pulse peak position shift ($t_{\textrm {peak}}$) for $\vert \kappa \vert <0.5$, while the pulse ‘center of mass’ ($t_{\textrm {CoM}}$) moves in the opposite direction. Asymmetry in the pulse does lead to an asymmetry also in the XPM signal, but the effect is rather small and using it requires a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than what was available in the present setup.

 figure: Fig. 8.

Fig. 8. Timing dependence on pulse shape. (a) Skew parameter $\kappa$ changes the shape of the generalized Gaussian pulses. (b) Time shift of the signal ($t_{\textrm {shift}}$, middle curve), pulse peak position ($t_{\textrm {peak}}$, bottom curve), and pulse ‘center of mass’ ($t_{\textrm {CoM}}$, top curve).

Download Full Size | PDF

Discussion. The results above indicate that encouraging results can be obtained with a simple setup that is fully compatible with modern optical clockwork with only small additions. A simple approach to reduce the short term jitter is not to simply locate the peak of the pulse but to fit a suitable model [e.g., Eq. (2)] to the data, and the long term drift should be removed automatically in the full system of Fig. 1 due to the reference pulses.

For optimum performance, several shortcomings of the current proof-of-concept setup should be addressed. Simple improvements include, e.g., a customized high-resolution spectrometer with high-speed read out (>100 klines/s available) that would reduce the dead time and allow a more detailed analysis of the signal, and a dual-channel spectrometer would enable simultaneous measurement of reference spectra for increased SNR. If the read-out rate is not important, then a high-resolution, compact echelle spectrograph using an imaging sensor could be used [24]. A polarization-maintaining laser would increase stability, and a higher pulse repetition rate and/or an increase of the temporal stretching would enable a full pulse period to be covered. The supercontinuum should also be optimized for broad bandwidth and high spectral uniformity [25]. Lowering the necessary pulse peak powers for XPM by several orders of magnitude should be possible using highly nonlinear waveguides or epsilon-near-zero materials [26]. For timing non-repetitive events, triggering of the detector or gating the supercontinuum to not ‘flood’ the detector in between the events is needed. Finally, calibration of the delay-wavelength dependence is probably easiest with the help of timing pulses from another mode-locked laser operating at a slightly different repetition rate. This would cause the timing pulses to slowly drift across the measurement range enabling accurate characterization of the delay-wavelength dependence.

In conclusion, a very simple yet powerful concept for all-optical event timing at the femtosecond level has been presented that is compatible with contemporary optical clockwork. Since time is encoded into an optical signal using optical timing pulses without resorting to high-speed electronics and electronic interpolation, very low drift over long times and temperature ranges is to be expected.

Funding

Academy of Finland (296476, 328389).

Acknowledgment

The work is part of the Academy of Finland Flagship Programme, Photonics Research and Innovation (PREIN), decision 320168.

Disclosures

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper may be obtained from the author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

1. J. Kalisz, Metrologia 41, 17 (2004). [CrossRef]  

2. P. Keranen, K. Maatta, and J. Kostamovaara, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60, 3162 (2011). [CrossRef]  

3. S. Schiller, Opt. Lett. 27, 766 (2002). [CrossRef]  

4. J.-D. Deschênes, L. C. Sinclair, F. R. Giorgetta, W. C. Swann, E. Baumann, H. Bergeron, M. Cermak, I. Coddington, and N. R. Newbury, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021016 (2016). [CrossRef]  

5. A. Abuduweili, X. Chen, Z. Chen, F. Meng, T. Wu, H. Guo, and Z. Zhang, Opt. Express 28, 39400 (2020). [CrossRef]  

6. B. H. Kolner and M. Nazarathy, Opt. Lett. 14, 630 (1989). [CrossRef]  

7. M. A. Foster, R. Salem, D. F. Geraghty, A. C. Turner-Foster, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Nature 456, 81 (2008). [CrossRef]  

8. B. Li, J. Bartos, Y. Xie, and S.-W. Huang, Optica 8, 1109 (2021). [CrossRef]  

9. J. Chou, O. Boyraz, D. Solli, and B. Jalali, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 161105 (2007). [CrossRef]  

10. A. Galvanauskas, J. A. Tellefsen, A. Krotkus, M. Öberg, and B. Broberg, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 145 (1992). [CrossRef]  

11. J. Valdmanis, Ultrafast Phenomena V (Springer, 1986), p. 82.

12. G. Beddard, G. McFadyen, G. Reid, and J. Thorne, Chem. Phys. Lett. 198, 641 (1992). [CrossRef]  

13. Z. Jiang and X.-C. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1945 (1998). [CrossRef]  

14. C. Y. Chien, B. L. Fontaine, A. Desparois, Z. Jiang, T. W. Johnston, J. C. Kieffer, H. Pépin, F. Vidal, and H. P. Mercure, Opt. Lett. 25, 578 (2000). [CrossRef]  

15. S. P. L. Blanc, E. W. Gaul, N. H. Matlis, A. Rundquist, and M. C. Downer, Opt. Lett. 25, 764 (2000). [CrossRef]  

16. J.-P. Geindre, P. Audebert, S. Rebibo, and J.-C. Gauthier, Opt. Lett. 26, 1612 (2001). [CrossRef]  

17. K. Y. Kim, I. Alexeev, and H. M. Milchberg, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 4124 (2002). [CrossRef]  

18. G. Sharma, K. Singh, I. Al-Naib, R. Morandotti, and T. Ozaki, Opt. Lett. 37, 4338 (2012). [CrossRef]  

19. J. K. Wahlstrand, S. Zahedpour, and H. M. Milchberg, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, 1476 (2016). [CrossRef]  

20. G. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Academic Press, 2007).

21. J. Barnes and D. Allan, “Variances based on data with dead time between the measurements,” NIST Technical Note 1318 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1990).

22. D. Sullivan, D. Allan, D. Howe, and F. Walls, “Characterization of clocks and oscillators,” NIST Technical Note 1337 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1990).

23. J. Hosking and J. Wallis, Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L-Moments (Cambridge University Press, 1997).

24. R. A. Probst, T. Steinmetz, Y. Wu, F. Grupp, T. Udem, and R. Holzwarth, Appl. Phys. B 123, 76 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. A. M. Heidt, A. Hartung, G. W. Bosman, P. Krok, E. G. Rohwer, H. Schwoerer, and H. Bartelt, Opt. Express 19, 3775 (2011). [CrossRef]  

26. M. Z. Alam, S. A. Schulz, J. Upham, I. De Leon, and R. W. Boyd, Nat. Photonics 12, 79 (2018). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper may be obtained from the author upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Illustration of optical time interpolation in between time marker pulses from a mode-locked laser. The moment of time is encoded into the spectrum of a time-stretched supercontinuum via cross phase modulation.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Nonlinear phase shifts induced by cross phase modulation on the chirped supercontinuum for different interaction lengths. (b) Example of experimental (top) and numerical (bottom) XPM signal.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Experimental setup. MLL, mode-locked laser; EDFA, Erbium-doped fiber amplifier; SHG, second-harmonic generation; PCF, photonic crystal fiber; BC, beam chopper; FS, PM-fiber spool; TS, translation stage; PS, piezo stretcher; PI, proportional-integral controller; PD, photodiode; OSA, optical spectrum analyzer.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a) Example spectra of the supercontinua used in this work and (b)–(d) the corresponding XPM signals obtained at the positions marked with circles in panel (a). The OSA integration time is also given.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Measured timing phase at 848 nm with (bottom) and without (top) active stabilization of the fiber delay line.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. (a) Pseudo-color plot of the XPM signal as the delay is scanned manually across the supercontinuum. (b) Spectrum (bottom) where the XPM signal is visible at 860 nm. The top line shows the delay dependence.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7. (a) Time deviation with dead time. See text for details. (b) Differential jitter as defined in the main text. Lines from top to bottom, 752, 814, 848, 845 nm.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8. Timing dependence on pulse shape. (a) Skew parameter $\kappa$ changes the shape of the generalized Gaussian pulses. (b) Time shift of the signal ($t_{\textrm {shift}}$, middle curve), pulse peak position ($t_{\textrm {peak}}$, bottom curve), and pulse ‘center of mass’ ($t_{\textrm {CoM}}$, top curve).

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

| E n l ( ω ) | 2 | E s c ( ω ) | 2 + η E s c ( ω ) e Δ ω 2 4 α p 2 i π / 2 + c . c . ,
S = | E n l ( ω ) | 2 | E s c ( ω ) | 2 | E s c ( ω ) | 2 = 2 η cos ( β 2 L 2 Δ ω 2 + π 4 ) e Δ ω 2 4 α p 2 ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.