Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Vertically coupled microresonators and oscillatory mode splitting in photonic molecules

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report the formation of a photonic molecule by vertically coupling two microdisk resonators. We show that mode splitting monotonously increases when one resonator vertically approaches the other. However, when the vertical distance is kept fixed and one resonator is moved horizontally with respect to the other, the strength of coupling and hence the mode splitting demonstrate an oscillatory behavior. This is attributed to the interference of light coupled into the resonators through multiple coupling regions as confirmed by a theoretical model based on coupled mode theory.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Benefiting from their ability to enhance light-matter interactions, high quality (Q) factor optical microcavities, in particular whispering-gallery-mode (WGM) microresonators [1], have been widely used in many applications ranging from ultra-high sensitive sensing [2–9 ] to low-threshold lasing [10, 11] to nonlinear optics [12–14 ]. They have been also employed as a platform for fundamental studies including quantum information [15, 16] and optomechanics [17,18]. Recently there has been an increasing interest in using two or more microresonators that are coupled with each other via their evanescent fields. Such interconnected microcavity clusters are referred to as photonic molecules (PMs), and they have been shown to modify and further enhance light-matter interactions by adjusting the coupling between adjacent microcavities [19].

In the formation of a PM, the resonance modes in each of the resonator hybridize leading to the formation of split modes. The frequency spacing of the split modes and their linewidths are controlled by tuning the coupling strength between the resonators. The tunability of coupling in PMs not only makes it possible to produce optical devices with improved performance or new functionalities such as single mode lasers [20] and optical delay lines [21] but also paves the way for exploiting novel physics. For example, the nontrivial physics around the exceptional point of a non-Hermitian system has been studied in PMs [22,23]. In a PM formed by a passive lossy microresonator and an active resonator with gain balancing the loss of the passive resonator, parity-time symmetry and its breaking have been demonstrated and nonreciprocal light transmission has been achieved [22]. Similarly, loss induced suppression and revival of Raman lasing has been demonstrated in a PM composed of silica toroid microresonators [23], and single mode laser was realized in laterally coupled microring resonators with InGaAsP quantum wells [20]. Tunable and controllable coupling between the resonators in a PM is undoubtedly the central issue for applications and for demonstrating their improved performance over a single microcavity [19]. Traditionally, the resonators in a PM are coupled horizontally, and the coupling strength decreases exponentially as the horizontal distance between the resonators increases [24].

In this Letter, we demonstrate the formation of a PM by vertically coupling two microdisk resonators. In this PM, decreasing the vertical distance between the planar surfaces of the microdisks monotonously increases the coupling strength and mode splitting; however, when one of the resonators is displaced laterally with respect to the other, mode splitting exhibits an oscillatory behavior indicating the oscillatory coupling between the modes. We also present a theoretical model based on coupled mode theory to explain this oscillatory behavior. The demonstration of horizontal oscillatory coupling in PMs with vertically coupled resonators enables realizing photonic structures with more functionalities and more flexibility, and manipulating the location of the PT-symmetric phase transition and exceptional points [22, 23].

2. Experimental results

In our experiments, we used two WGM microdisk silica resonators μR1 and μR2 with resonance wavelengths at 1553.7 nm to form the vertically coupled PM as shown in Fig. 1(a). The microdisks were fabricated in the same batch with silica on silicon wafer, and thus they were of the same radius (∼ 38 μm) and thickness (∼ 2 μm). The Q factors of the resonators were ∼ 1.6×105. To have easy access for vertical and lateral coupling, and for precise manipulation of the relative positions of the resonators, we fabricated the resonators at the edges of two different wafers, as clearly shown in the optical microscope images of μR2 taken in the transmission (Fig. 1(b)) and the reflection configurations (Fig. 1(c)).

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Coupled microdisk resonators. (a) Illustration of the vertically coupled microdisk resonators μR1 and μR2 forming a photonic molecule (PM). Light is coupled to the PM through μR1 via a tapered fiber. (b) and (c) Optical micrographs taken in the transmission and reflection configurations, respectively, showing the top views of μR2. The radius of μR2 is 38 μm, which approximately equals that of μR1.

Download Full Size | PDF

We studied the optical properties of the vertically coupled WGM resonators by coupling light from a 1550-nm band external cavity laser diode to μR1 via a tapered fiber as shown in Fig. 1(a). The tapered fiber was coupled to μR1 from its bottom side to avoid any direct coupling to μR2. The transmission spectra of the coupled system were monitored by recording the transmission at the output port of the tapered fiber by a photodetector connected to an oscilloscope as the wavelength of the laser diode was scanned. A thermo-electric cooler was used to precisely tune the resonance wavelength of μR1 to be exactly the same as that of μR2. A manual rotation stage and two 3-axis piezo nanopositioning stages (100-nm precision) were employed to align μR1 and μR2 on parallel planes, and then to change the relative horizontal and vertical positions of μR2 with respect to μR1, which was kept fixed to ensure a stable coupling with the tapered fiber. Despite the fact that we could precisely (within 100 nm) tune the distance between the resonators, it was very challenging to measure the exact vertical distance between them. Using optical images taken by CCD cameras attached to optical microscopes, we roughly estimated the vertical distance between the microdisks to be about 1 μm before changing the distance by moving the second microdisk vertically using the nanopositioning stage. Since initially the resonance frequencies of the modes in the microdisks were not spec-trally overlapping with each other (i.e., non-degenarate), we could not observe mode splitting even if the resonators were within 1 μm with each other. We used a thermo-electric cooler to tune the resonance wavelength of μR1 to be the same as that of μR2. As the resonances started to overlap with each other, the modes started exchanging energy (i.e., coupled resonators) and mode splitting was observed in the transmission spectra. We continued the tuning process until the mode splitting was maximized, implying that the modes were maximally coupled (i.e., their central frequencies were the same and spectral overlap was maximized). After then we tuned the distance between the resonators as we monitored the mode splitting. Presence of mode splitting and the continuous increase in the splitting amount, as we decreased the distance between the resonators, implied that spectral overlap of the resonances did not change much to affect our results. For the following discussions and the theoretical model, we label the center of the top surfaces of μR1 and μR2 as O1 and O2, respectively, and set their spatial coordinates as (0,0,0) and (x,y,z). The top surface of μR1 is on xOy plane, which is parallel to that of μR2. Note that the top surface of μR2 is close to that of μR1 (see Fig. 1(a)). Therefore, z represents the vertical distance between the two resonators, and x2+y2 is the transverse distance between O1 and O2.

We performed two sets of experiments. In both of the experiments, the transmission spectra were recorded as the position of μR2 was varied while the position of μR1 was fixed at (0,0,0). In the first set of experiments, we varied the vertical distance between the resonators (i.e., O2 at different values of z) and kept x and y fixed (i.e., no lateral displacement). Figure 2(a) presents the intensity graph obtained from this experiment when the vertical distance between the resonators was reduced by 900 nm with a step resolution of 100 nm; each step-like change in the transmission spectra corresponds to a 100-nm change in the vertical distance. It is clearly seen that the mode splitting of the PM, which indicates the coupling strength between the resonators, increased as the vertical coupling between the resonators decreased. This dependence of mode splitting on the vertical distance can be explained as follows. The spectral and spatial overlaps of the involved WGMs in each resonator determine the coupling strength between the resonators. In our experiments, the selected WGMs were adjusted to have the same resonance frequency to maximize spectral overlap. Moreover, the amplitudes of the wavevectors were fixed at the time of the selection of the WGMs, and thus the angle between the wavevectors of the selected WGMs, which are in the tangential directions of the rims of the resonators, stayed the same because the transverse positions of the resonators stayed the same. With the spectral overlap and the wavevectors fixed, increasing the spatial overlap of the two WGMs in μR1 and μR2 by decreasing their vertical distance increased mode splitting in an exponential form as shown in Fig. 2(a). Theoretically, the mode splitting of coupled resonators increases exponentially as the gap between them decreases. However, as reported in the experiments for the coupled coplanar resonators [24], when the gap between the coupled resonators approaches zero, the mode profiles are significantly disturbed and the losses of the involved modes increase due to increased scattering losses. This significantly broadens the resonances and reduces effective coupling. As a result, resonance modes become indiscernible in the transmission spectrum.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Dependence of mode splitting of vertically coupled resonators on the vertical gap between μR1 and μR2. (a) Normalized transmission spectra measured when the gap between the two microresonators was decreased by 0.9 μm with steps of 100-nm. (b) Simulation results showing the transmission spectra of the photonic molecule when the vertical distance between the resonators was varied by moving μR2 along the z-axis (see Fig. 1(a)). The experimental results agree well with the simulation results predicted by our theoretical model.

Download Full Size | PDF

The dependence of the mode splitting of PMs consisting of two coplanar resonators on their transverse distance has been extensively investigated [19]. It was shown that mode splitting monotonously increased as one resonator approached the other [24]. Here, in the second set of experiments, we placed two WGM resonators on two parallel planes as illustrated in Fig. 1(a), and varied the transverse distance between the resonators by moving μR2 in x direction while the vertical distance between them was kept fixed. We observed that the mode splitting spectra and the coupling strength between the resonators exhibited an oscillatory behavior as μR2 was moved horizontally (Fig. 3(a)). This is in stark contrast with both the vertical-scan case (Fig. 2) and the transversely-scanned coplanar PM structures [19, 24] in which mode splitting and the coupling strength monotonously increased as the transverse distance was decreased.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Oscillatory coupling of vertically coupled resonators in a photonic molecule. (a) Experimentally obtained transmission spectra when the microdisk μR2 was moved along a line parallel to x axis (see Fig. 1(a)) while the vertical distance between the resonators was kept fixed. (b) Simulation results showing the transmission spectra of the photonic molecule when the position of μR2 was varied only along the x-axis while the position in y and z was kept fixed. The experimental results agree well with the simulation results predicted by our theoretical model.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Theoretical analysis

In the following, we introduce a theoretical model, which is based on coupled mode theory [25], to explain the oscillatory splitting spectra observed in the experiments. The geometric illustration used in developing the model is given in Fig. 4. For simplicity, we assume the coupling between μR1 and μR2 or the tapered fiber takes place only at points labeled by Pm with m being an integer. Pm is on the rims of the WGM resonators and gives the minimum distances between the rim of μR1 and that of μR2 or the waveguide. The coupling coefficient at Pm is κ m, its corresponding transmission coefficient is t m, satisfying |t m|2 + |κm|2 = 1. As an example, κ 1, t 1 and their conjugates are marked in Fig. 4. The key point of this theory is that it takes into account the interference of light coupled into WGM resonators through multiple different points. Under this framework, the equations governing the coupling behaviors at the points P1, P2, and P3 are

(EoutE1)=(t1κ1κ1*t1*)(EinE3α3eiϕ3),
(E4E2)=(t2κ2κ2*t2*)(E5α5eiϕ5E1α1eiϕ1),
and
(E5E3)=(t3κ3κ3*t3*)(E4α4eiϕ4E2α2eiϕ2),
respectively, where E in and E out are the amplitudes of the light in the tapered fiber just before and after P1. Here E m is the light field in two WGM resonators right after Pm, αm=eα0Lm/2 and ϕ m = kL m are the amplitude variations and phase changes, respectively, experienced by E m due to its propagation from one coupling point to its next one along the rim of the WGM resonator, α 0 indicates the effective absorption coefficient including all the losses except for the coupling loss, L m is the length of the arc between Pm and its neighboring coupling point in the propagation direction of light on the rims of μR1 and μR2 and k = 2πn eff is the magnitude of the WGM wavevector with n eff and λ, respectively, being the effective refractive index and the wavelength of the light in vacuum. The coupling coefficients κ m are determined by the amount of the spatial overlap between the involved WGMs and the difference of their wavevectors. Accordingly, we have
κm=κm0e2γksin(θ2)λ0ekz,
which takes its maximum value κ m0 at the point Pm with θ = 0 and z = 0. κ m0 varies with mode numbers, especially radial mode numbers, of the involved whispering gallery modes due to the difference in mode distributions and propagation constants. In Eq. (4), θ is the angle between the wavevectors of the involved WGMs, γ is a constant determining the decay rate of κ m with respect to the momentum mismatch of the involved WGMs and λ 0 indicates the original resonance wavelength of the coupled WGM resonators. e2γksin(θ2)λ0 indicates that κ m exponentially decays with the increase of the difference between the wavevectors of the involved WGMs 2ksin(θ2); and e kz describes the effect that κ m decreases when the coupled resonators move away from each other along z axis thereby decreasing the spatial overlap of the involved WGMs. We neglected the change of the spatial overlap between the involved WGMs due to the lateral movement.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Schematics of the theoretical model. The microdisks μR1 and μR2 forming the PM are located on parallel planes, their centers and diameters are indicated by O1,2 and R 1,2, respectively. E in and E out are the amplitudes of the input and output light fields in the tapered fiber. Coupling between different optical components takes place through coupling points Pm with coupling coefficients κ m and transmission coefficients t m. E m indicates the light field amplitude just after the coupling point Pm. E m experiences amplitude changes α m and phase changes ϕ m, respectively, while propagating along different arcs separated by coupling points Pm. θ is the angle between the wavevectors of the coupled whispering gallery modes at the coupling points.

Download Full Size | PDF

By solving Eqs. (1)(3), the normalized transmission of the tapered fiber coupled PM can be expressed as

T=|EoutEin|2=|t1+Aα1α3ei(ϕ1+ϕ3)1+At1*α1α3ei(ϕ1+ϕ3)|2,
where
A=t2*t3*α2eiϕ2+κ2κ3*α4eiϕ4+α2α4α5ei(ϕ2+ϕ4+ϕ5)1t2t3α4α5ei(ϕ4+ϕ5)+κ2*κ3α2α5ei(ϕ2+ϕ5).

The simulation results using Eq. (5) show a very good agreement with the experimentally measured data as shown in Figs. 2(b) and 3(b). In the simulations, we used the following parameters: R 1 = R 2 = 38 μm, α 0 = 0.1688 cm−1, n eff = 1.38, γ = 0.3, κ 1 = 0.0534i, κ 20κ 30 = 0.0142i, and λ 0 = 1553.7 nm for both cases, and (x,y) = (0,3.5) and (y,z) = (3.5,0.2) in units of μm for the simulations of Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 3(b), respectively. κ 1 was set as a constant in consistent with the experimental setting where the tapered fiber and μR1 were kept stable.

As presented in Figs. 2 and 3 that the experimental results agree very well with the theoretical results. Therefore, we can attribute the oscillatory coupling behavior of the vertically coupled PM in response to horizontal displacement of one resonator from the other to the interference between the light coupled into the WGM resonators through different coupling regions. It is well known that interference was determine by the amplitudes and phases of the involved light field. The former determines the contrast ratio of the interference pattern, and the latter impacts the spatial and temporal distributions of the interference pattern. In vertically coupled PMs, ϕ m was determined only by the relative horizontal displacement between the coupled resonators. Thus the interference-induced oscillatory coupling only showed up when the resonators in PMs experienced relative transverse motion rather than a relative vertical motion. The ability to vary the coupling strength between the vertically coupled WGM resonators just by laterally displacing one of the resonators with respect to the other within distances of tens of micrometers provides more flexibility in constructing three dimensional (3D) photonic devices based on WGM or microring resonators.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have studied both theoretically and experimentally the dependence of the coupling strength and the mode splitting spectra of vertically coupled PMs on the relative positions of the resonators forming the PM. We observed that, in contrast to the exponential dependence on the vertical displacement of the two WGM resonators, mode splitting and the coupling strength show an oscillatory dependence on the relative transverse displacement. This allows the coupled resonators to have an efficient coupling even if one of the resonators is laterally shifted by tens of μm. We also introduced a theoretical model which successfully explains the observed oscillatory coupling behavior by considering the interference of light coupled into the resonators from multiple coupling regions. We believe that the oscillatory coupling between vertically coupled resonators achieved by adjusting their relative horizontal displacement is useful in many applications of PMs, such as ultra-sensitive sensing, construction of 3D photonic devices, and manipulation of the exceptional point of PT symmetric resonators.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the 973 programs (Grant Nos. 2011CB922003 and 2013CB328702), the NSFC (Grant Nos. 11374165 and 11174153), the 111 Project (Grant No. B07013), the China Scholarship Council, and ARO under grant No. W911NF-12-1-0026.

References and links

1. K. J. Vahala, “Optical microcavities,” Nature 424, 839–846 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. F. Vollmer and S. Arnold, “Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules,” Nat. Methods 5, 591–596 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. X. Fan, I. M. White, S. I. Shopova, H. Zhu, J. D. Suter, and Y. Sun, “Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: A review,” Anal. Chim. Acta 620, 8–26 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. F. Vollmer, S. Arnold, and D. Keng, “Single virus detection from the reactive shift of a whispering-gallery mode,” P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105, 20701–20704 (2008). [CrossRef]  

5. J. Zhu, S. K. Ozdemir, Y.-F. Xiao, L. Li, L. He, D.-R. Chen, and L. Yang, “On-chip single nanoparticle detection and sizing by mode splitting in an ultrahigh-Q microresonator,” Nat. Photon. 4, 46–49 (2010). [CrossRef]  

6. L. He, S. K. Ozdemir, J. Zhu, W. Kim, and L. Yang, “Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 428–432 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. L. Shao, X. F. Jiang, X. C. Yu, B. B. Li, W. R. Clements, F. Vollmer, W. Wang, Y. F. Xiao, and Q. Gong, “Detection of single nanoparticles and lentiviruses using microcavity resonance broadening,” Adv. Mater. 25, 5616–5620 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. S. K. Ozdemir, J. Zhu, X. Yang, B. Peng, H. Yilmaz, L. He, F. Monifi, S. H. Huang, G. L. Long, and L. Yang, “Highly sensitive detection of nanoparticles with a self-referenced and self-heterodyned whispering-gallery Raman microlaser,” P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, E3836–E3844 (2014). [CrossRef]  

9. B.-B. Li, W. R. Clements, X.-C. Yu, K. Shi, Q. Gong, and Y.-F. Xiao, “Single nanoparticle detection using split-mode microcavity Raman lasers,” P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 14657–14662 (2014). [CrossRef]  

10. S. M. Spillane, T. J. Kippenberg, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultralow-threshold Raman laser using a spherical dielectric microcavity,” Nature 415, 621–623 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. L. He, S. K. Ozdemir, and L. Yang, “Whispering gallery microcavity lasers,” Laser & Photon. Rev. 7, 60–82 (2013). [CrossRef]  

12. V. S. Ilchenko, A. A. Savchenkov, A. B. Matsko, and L. Maleki, “Nonlinear optics and crystalline whispering gallery mode cavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 043903 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. T. Beckmann, H. Linnenbank, H. Steigerwald, B. Sturman, D. Haertle, K. Buse, and I. Breunig, “Highly tunable low-threshold optical parametric oscillation in radially poled whispering gallery resonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 143903 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. C. Marquardt, D. Strekalov, J. Furst, M. Fortsch, and G. Leuchs, “Nonlinear Optics in Crystalline Whispering Gallery Resonators,” Opt. Photon. News 24, 38–45 (2013). [CrossRef]  

15. T. Aoki, B. Dayan, E. Wilcut, W. P. Bowen, A. S. Parkins, T. J. Kippenberg, K. J. Vahala, and H. J. Kimble, “Observation of strong coupling between one atom and a monolithic microresonator,” Nature 443, 671–674 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. M. Fortsch, J. U. Furst, C. Wittmann, D. Strekalov, A. Aiello, M. V. Chekhova, C. Silberhorn, G. Leuchs, and C. Marquardt, “A versatile source of single photons for quantum information processing,” Nat. Commun. 4, 1818 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. T. J. Kippenberg and K. J. Vahala, “Cavity optomechanics: back-action at the mesoscale,” Science 321, 1172–1176 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. C. Dong, V. Fiore, M. C. Kuzyk, and H. Wang, “Optomechanical dark mode,” Science 338, 1609–1613 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. S. Boriskina, “Photonic molecules and spectral engineering,” in Photonic Microresonator Research and Applications, I. Chremmos, O. Schwelb, and N. Uzunoglu, eds. (Springer, 2010), pp. 393–421. [CrossRef]  

20. H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, “Parity-time-symmetric microring lasers,” Science 346, 975–978 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. F. Xia, L. Sekaric, and Y. Vlasov, “Ultracompact optical buffers on a silicon chip,” Nat. Photon. 1, 65–71 (2007). [CrossRef]  

22. B. Peng, S. K. Ozdemir, F. Lei, F. Monifi, M. Gianfreda, G. L. Long, S. Fan, F. Nori, C. M. Bender, and L. Yang, “Parity-time-symmetric whispering-gallery microcavities,” Nat. Phys. 10, 394–398 (2014). [CrossRef]  

23. B. Peng, S. K. Ozdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C. M. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, “Loss-induced suppression and revival of lasing,” Science 346, 328–332 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. B. Peng, S. K. Ozdemir, J. Zhu, and L. Yang, “Photonic molecules formed by coupled hybrid resonators,” Opt. Lett. 37, 3435–3437 (2012). [CrossRef]  

25. A. Yariv, “Universal relations for coupling of optical power between microresonators and dielectric waveguides,” Electron. Lett. 36, 321–322 (2000). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Coupled microdisk resonators. (a) Illustration of the vertically coupled microdisk resonators μR1 and μR2 forming a photonic molecule (PM). Light is coupled to the PM through μR1 via a tapered fiber. (b) and (c) Optical micrographs taken in the transmission and reflection configurations, respectively, showing the top views of μR2. The radius of μR2 is 38 μm, which approximately equals that of μR1.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Dependence of mode splitting of vertically coupled resonators on the vertical gap between μR1 and μR2. (a) Normalized transmission spectra measured when the gap between the two microresonators was decreased by 0.9 μm with steps of 100-nm. (b) Simulation results showing the transmission spectra of the photonic molecule when the vertical distance between the resonators was varied by moving μR2 along the z-axis (see Fig. 1(a)). The experimental results agree well with the simulation results predicted by our theoretical model.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Oscillatory coupling of vertically coupled resonators in a photonic molecule. (a) Experimentally obtained transmission spectra when the microdisk μR2 was moved along a line parallel to x axis (see Fig. 1(a)) while the vertical distance between the resonators was kept fixed. (b) Simulation results showing the transmission spectra of the photonic molecule when the position of μR2 was varied only along the x-axis while the position in y and z was kept fixed. The experimental results agree well with the simulation results predicted by our theoretical model.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Schematics of the theoretical model. The microdisks μR1 and μR2 forming the PM are located on parallel planes, their centers and diameters are indicated by O1,2 and R 1,2, respectively. E in and E out are the amplitudes of the input and output light fields in the tapered fiber. Coupling between different optical components takes place through coupling points Pm with coupling coefficients κ m and transmission coefficients t m. E m indicates the light field amplitude just after the coupling point Pm. E m experiences amplitude changes α m and phase changes ϕ m, respectively, while propagating along different arcs separated by coupling points Pm. θ is the angle between the wavevectors of the coupled whispering gallery modes at the coupling points.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

( E o u t E 1 ) = ( t 1 κ 1 κ 1 * t 1 * ) ( E i n E 3 α 3 e i ϕ 3 ) ,
( E 4 E 2 ) = ( t 2 κ 2 κ 2 * t 2 * ) ( E 5 α 5 e i ϕ 5 E 1 α 1 e i ϕ 1 ) ,
( E 5 E 3 ) = ( t 3 κ 3 κ 3 * t 3 * ) ( E 4 α 4 e i ϕ 4 E 2 α 2 e i ϕ 2 ) ,
κ m = κ m 0 e 2 γ k sin ( θ 2 ) λ 0 e k z ,
T = | E out E in | 2 = | t 1 + A α 1 α 3 e i ( ϕ 1 + ϕ 3 ) 1 + A t 1 * α 1 α 3 e i ( ϕ 1 + ϕ 3 ) | 2 ,
A = t 2 * t 3 * α 2 e i ϕ 2 + κ 2 κ 3 * α 4 e i ϕ 4 + α 2 α 4 α 5 e i ( ϕ 2 + ϕ 4 + ϕ 5 ) 1 t 2 t 3 α 4 α 5 e i ( ϕ 4 + ϕ 5 ) + κ 2 * κ 3 α 2 α 5 e i ( ϕ 2 + ϕ 5 ) .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.