Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Laser-induced shift of the Morin point in antiferromagnetic DyFeO3

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Imaging domain structure of antiferromagnetic DyFeO3 reveals that intense laser excitation can control the temperature of the Morin transition from collinear to non-collinear spin state. Excitation of the antiferromagnet with femtosecond laser pulses with the central wavelength of 800 nm leads to a shift of the transition temperature over 1 K to higher values as if the light effectively cools the irradiated area down. It is suggested that the optical control of the Morin point can be a result of photo-ionization of Dy3+ ions.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Manipulation of magnetic order with the help of light is a counter-intuitive research subject and an issue of intense debates in many areas of science ranging from the physics of spintronics [1], magnonics [2], multiferroics [3] to organic chemistry [5]. The development of lasers which are able to generate sub-100 fs intense pulses has made optical control of magnetism especially appealing. In particular, it led to the seminal observation of subpicosecond demagnetization in ferromagnetic nickel by a 60-fs laser pulse [6] and triggered the field of ultrafast magnetism. This has been continuously fueled by intriguing observations and caused no shortage of controversy in the scientific community [7,8]. The action of electric field on electronic charges, being the largest perturbation in physics of light-matter interaction, conserves the spin of electron and an efficient control of magnetic properties of media with light is therefore counter-intuitive.

Despite this fact, several effective mechanisms of such a control have been demonstrated up to date and antiferromagnetic rare-earth orthoferrites played in these studies an important role. Due to strong temperature-dependent magnetic anisotropy many rare-earth orthoferrites posses temperature driven spin-reorientation phase transitions. Therefore, even laser-induced heating is able to induce spin reorientation in these antiferromagnets [9, 10]. Rare-earth orthoferrites are also materials with a strong spin-orbit interaction in the excited state and optically induced population of the excited states can effectively change the spin-orbit interaction [11–13]. Such a photo-induced spin-orbit interaction can be seen as a modification of magnetic anisotropy and thus it is equivalent to an action of effective magnetic field experienced by the spins. Phenomenologically, the opto-magnetic fields can be described in terms of the inverse Faraday and Cotton-Mouton effects [14]. Recently, it was suggested that laser excitation of the charge-transfer transitions in the rare-earth orthoferrites can effectively lead to optical modification of the spin-spin exchange interactions in these materials [15]. Phenomenologically, this observation can be seen as the inverse magnetorefractive effect [16,17]. All these studies show that light can effectively manipulate spins, controlling spin-orbit and spin-spin interactions responsible for spin order. Obviously, such a photo-induced change of the strength of the fundamental interactions should also affect critical temperatures of phase transition in the orthoferrites. Despite a large number of publications on spin dynamics induced in rare-earth orthoferrites by intense pulses in the visible and THz spectral range, an effect of intense optical excitation on the critical temperatures of the orthoferrites has not been discussed until now. In the present manuscript we address this problem and report about an effect of intense laser radiation on the critical temperature of the spin reorientation phase transition in antiferromagnetic dielectric DyFeO3. It is argued that if an intense optical pumping ionizes Dy3+ ions bringing them into the Dy4+ state, it should lead to a substantial change of the effective exchange interaction between the spins of the Dy and Fe ions, affect the magnetic anisotropy experienced by the Fe-ions, change the temperature dependence of the magnetic anisotropy and thus shift the Morin point at which the spin reorientation occurs.

2. Studied sample and experimental technique

Dysprosium orthoferrite DyFeO3 possess rather unique magnetic and magneto-optical properties which make this material attractive for optical studies of magnetic phenomena, in general, and phase transitions, in particular. Rare-earth orthoferrites are antiferromagnets with the Neel temperature of 650 K [18]. The four iron ions Fe3+ form two antiferromagnetically coupled magnetic sublattices M1 and M2, such that |M1| = |M2|. DyFeO3 is characterized by a very strong temperature dependence of magnetic anisotropy that leads to a spontaneous first-order Morin phase transition at TM=38 K [18]. Below the Morin point, the spins are in collinear antiferromagnetic phase with magnetic moments of the two sublattices M1 and M2 aligned along the y–axis, so that M1 + M2 = 0. Above TM, the magnetic moments of the sublattices get aligned along the x axis. Moreover, due to the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction the spins of the two sublattices acquire a canting over an angle of about 0.5 degrees, giving rise to a small spontaneous magnetization M = M1 + M2 ≠ 0 along the z axis. Without any magnetic field the crystal splits into two types of domains with the magnetization parallel and antiparallel to the z axis, respectively. Phenomenologically, the phase transition is explained as a result of interplay between two contributions to the magnetic anisotropy experienced by the Fe3+ spins [19]. The first contribution in the vicinity of TM almost does not depend on temperature. It originates from the spin-orbit interaction and the effect of the crystal lattice on the orbitals of Fe3+ ions. The second contribution originates from the spin-spin exchange interaction between 3d-electrons of the Fe3+ and 4f -electrons of the Dy3+-ions. This contribution is strongly temperature dependent as a result of thermally induced repopulation of 4f states of the Dy3+ ions.

Despite the small magnetization in the high temperature phase, DyFeO3 exhibits a giant Faraday rotation of about 3000°cm−1 which makes this material especially convenient for magneto-optical measurements. To avoid effects of the linear birefringence on the Faraday rotation [20] the studied DyFeO3 crystal was cut perpendicular to the optical axis [4] and had the thickness of 100 μm. The optical axis is tilted over 55 degrees with respect to the z–axis. In our experiments we employed the technique of magneto-optical imaging with a possibility to excite the sample with a well defined sequence of ultrashort laser pulses. Each of the pulses had the duration of 60 fs. The details of the setup are described elsewhere [21].

Using the magneto-optical Faraday effect we visualized the magnetic domains in DyFeO3 crystal. With the help of these measurements we studied how laser excitation, magnetic field and temperature affect the domain pattern. Figure 1 shows typical magneto-optical images of the orthoferrite measured in the vicinity of the Morin point. In the following for convenience instead of temperature T we will use new variable ΔT=T−TM. In the low temperature phase the net magnetization is zero and the image is seen as a grey area, as shown in Fig. 1(a). A typical domain pattern in the high temperature phase is shown in Fig. 1(c). The black and the white areas correspond to the domains in which the magnetization Mz points “up” and “down”, respectively. In fact, this stripe-like structure of the black and white domains shows that the crystal is in the high-temperature Γ4 phase. In the vicinity of the Morin point (|ΔT|≤0.15 K) one observes a co-existence of the both phases, as it shown in Fig. 1(b), which is typical for first-order phase transitions. We have not observed any pronounced temperature hysteresis of the Morin transition in DyFeO3, see Fig. 1(d). This hysteresis-free behavior, in contrast to the common expectations for first-order phase transitions, is typical for the Morin transition in DyFeO3 [19].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a)–(c) Magneto-optical images of DyFeO3 single crystal in zero magnetic field at three different temperatures in the vicinity of the Morin point TM (ΔT=T−TM). Grey areas at ΔT=−1 K correspond to the collinear antiferromagnetic phase Γ1. Black and white stripe domains detected at ΔT=0 and ΔT=1 K are ferromagnetic domains in the Γ4 phase with magnetizations “up” and “down”, respectively. (d) Changes in the net magnetization upon warming up (red) and cooling down (blue), estimated from the images.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental results

We have found that if the crystal is excited with about 10 ultrashort laser pulses, the Morin temperature of the irradiated area changes. Each of these pulses had the fluence of about 20 μJ and the central wavelength of 800 nm. Figure 2 shows images of the crystal taken after the illumination. It is seen that in the low temperature phase the excitation hardly contributes to the contrast. Upon an increase of the temperature the crystal undergoes the Morin transition from the collinear to non-collinear antiferromagnetic spin state. In the area irradiated by the laser pulses the Morin transition occurs at higher temperature than in the surroundings.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Magneto-optical images of the photo-excited DyFeO3 single crystal at different temperatures. The area excited by a sequence of at least 10 ultrashort laser pulses is shown by solid circle. In the low temperature phase (ΔT=T−TM=−1 K) one can hardly distinguish any contrast between the laser-excited and non-excited areas. A temperature increase reveals that in the area prepared by the laser-excitation the Morin transition occurs at higher temperatures.

Download Full Size | PDF

It is known that for temperatures just below the Morin point the transition can be triggered by a moderate magnetic field H>Hc applied along the z–crystallographic axis [19]. In order to trigger the field-induced Morin transition, we canted the magnetic field H in the sample plane (010) over 15 degrees such that the field acquired projections on all three crystallographic axes. Fig. 3 shows the images of the domain pattern obtained for the sample at the fixed temperature just below the Morin point ΔT=−5 K at different magnetic fields. These measurements clearly reveal that the irradiated area, experiences belated changes upon the field increase. To summarize the experimental observation, we have plotted H-T phase diagram of the Morin transition. It was found that the diagram in the area which has been exposed to the intense laser excitation is substantially shifted from the diagram for the unaffected area, as shown in Fig. 4. We could not reveal any dependence of the difference between the diagrams on the number of the laser pulses. Once the photo-excited state is formed the phase diagram does not change anymore. All these experiments clearly reveal an effect of intense laser excitation on the Morin temperature in DyFeO3 shifting the whole phase diagram to higher temperatures. We have not revealed any correlation between the probability of appearance of the area with a changed Morin temperature on the repetition rate of the exciting pulses. The lifetime of the photo-induced state exceeds 3 hours. We could not erase the photo-induced state even by heating the sample up to 150 K.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Magneto-optical images of the photo-excited DyFeO3 single crystal obtained at different magnetic fields and at fixed temperature ΔT=T−TM=−5 K. Rows (a) and (b) correspond to the experiments performed in positive and negative magnetic field, respectively. Applying a positive field induces the Morin transition into a single domain state with the magnetization “up”. Applying a negative magnetic field induces the Morin transition into a single domain state with the magnetization “down”. The stripe domain pattern corresponds to the intermediate state, i.e. the state in which domains of the two competing phases Γ1 and Γ4 coexist [26]. In the area excited by the sequence of the laser pulses, marked by solid line, the Morin transition occurs at higher fields.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The phase diagram revealing the ratio of the critical magnetic field Hc and the critical temperature ΔTM at the Morin transition, defined as ΔTM = TM (Hc) − TM (0), for the crystal area unaffected by the photo-excitation and the area exposed to the photo-excitation. It is seen that the Morin point in the photo-excited area is clearly shifted. The inset shows changes in the net magnetization upon application of magnetic field, estimated from the images, and the way how the critical magnetic field was determined.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Discussion

The phase transition from Γ1 to Γ4 phase in the orthoferrite originates from thermally induced repopulation of 4f states of Dy-ions. It thus reasonable to suggest that the photo-induced change of the temperature of the phase transition originates from long-living effects of light on the Dy-subsystem.

The Dy3+ ion contains 9 electrons on the outer 4f shell, thus being the Kramer’s ion. The local symmetry the ion in DyFeO3 is described by the point group CS so that the original ground state multiplet 6H15/2 (L=5, S=5/2, J=15/2), corresponding to that of the Dy3+ ion, splits and the lowest two doublets with a good accuracy are |±152 (MJ = ±15/2), |±132 (MJ = ±13/2) [22]. The energy separation between these two doublets is about E1 =6.5 meV. Since the Dy3+ ions are located in non-centrosymmetric positions, otherwise forbidden optical transitions become allowed in electric dipole approximation, including the transition from 6H15/2 to 6F5/2 (L=3, S=5/2, J=5/2) around 1.5 eV, which perfectly matches the energy of the pumping photons.

Importantly, the light-induced shift of the Morin point was observed only under pumping by very intense laser pulses with fluence around 1 PW/cm2. When dielectrics are excited by light with so large intensities, the multiphoton absorption, necessary to induce an interband transition, cannot be neglected [23]. Moreover, multiphoton process get significantly enhanced near optical resonances in the vicinity of real transitions, such as 6H15/26F5/2. Thus it is reasonable to assume that intense pumping of the Dy3+ ions in our experiments results in photo-ionization of the Dy3+ ions. In real crystals due to defects and impurities there is always a possibility that the excited electrons will be caught by deep and long-living states in the band gap. In this case the dysprosium ions are effectively brought to a long-living Dy4+ state. It is interesting to analyze how such an ionization of the dysprosium ions can affect the Morin point in DyFeO3 crystals.

The ground multiplet of the long-living Dy4+ state is 7F9 (L=3, S=6, J=9). Note, that the way how the ground multiplet of the Dy4+ ions splits in the crystal field in DyFeO3 is similar to the splitting of the ground multiplet of the Tb3+ ions in TbFeO3. One can say that a photo-ionization of Dy3+ ions makes them Tb3+-like.

The effective exchange field Hex between the spins of the 3d-electrons of the transition ions and the 4f -electrons of the rare-earth ions is proportional to the Lande factor gL of the rare-earth ion [25]:

Hex~gL1gL.
So, the value of the d- f exchange increases in the direction from heavier rare-earth ions to lighter. The Lande factors of the 6H15/2 and 7F9 multiplets are quite different (gL = 1/3 in the case of 6H15/2 and gL = 1/4 in the case of 7F9). Consequently, the photo-ionization of the Dy3+ into Tb3+-like ion results into an increase of the exchange field.

In the model of the Morin transition suggested in [19] the Morin temperature TM is defined by the equality:

KDy(TM)=KFe,
where KFe is the energy of magnetic anisotropy which holds the Fe3+ spins in the xz-plane (Γ4 phase). KDy(T) is the temperature dependent d- f exchange energy. It acts as an effective anisotropy on the Fe+3 spins and tries to align the spins in the xy plane, along the y-axis (Γ1 phase). According to [19]:
KDy(T)=KDy(0)tanh(E12kT),
where k is the Boltzman constant and KDy (0) ∼ (Hex)2.

If the concentration of the Dy4+-ions induced by light is small (x≪1), one can find that:

KDy=(1x)KDy3++xKDy4+.
Here parameters KDy3+ and KDy4+ account for the difference of the Lande factors of the ions.

Substituting Eq. (4) into the Eq. (2) one obtains:

KDy(0)(1+79x)tanh(E12kT)=KFe.
The very same equation can be written as:
1TMTMx79sinh(E1kTM)E1kTM.
Equation (6) shows that in order to shift the Morin point over 1 K, it is sufficient to ionize about 2 % of the dysprosium ions.

5. Conclusion

Imaging magnetic domains in antiferromagnetic DyFeO3 in the vicinity of the Morin point allows to reveal an effect of ultrashort intense laser pulses on the critical temperature of the phase transition in the orthoferrite. It is shown that excitation of the antiferromagnet with at least 10 femtosecond laser pulses at the central wavelength 800 nm leads to a shift of the transition temperature over 1 K to higher values as if the light can effectively cools the irradiated area down. The measurements at different temperatures and magnetic fields allowed us to reveal the whole phase diagram for the photo-excited crystal. It is suggested that the optical control of the Morin point can be a result of photo-ionization of Dy3+ ions.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the program Leading Scientist of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science ( 14.Z50.31.0034) and the European Research Council under the European Unions Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 257280 (Femtomagnetism), the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM, the European Unionś Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013) Grants No. NMP3-LA-2010-246102 (IFOX). The authors thank R.V. Pisarev for providing the samples and Th. Rasing for continuous support.

References and links

1. I. Zutic, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, “Spintronics: Fundamentals and applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004). [CrossRef]  

2. V. V. Kruglyak, S. O. Demokritov, and D. Grundler, “Magnonics,” J. Phys. Cond. Mat. D 43, 264001 (2010).

3. T. Kubacka, J. A. Johnson, M. C. Hoffmann, C. Vicario, S. de Jong, P. Beaud, S. Grbel, S.-W. Huang, L. Huber, L. Patthey, Y.-D. Chuang, J. J. Turner, G. L. Dakovski, W.-S. Lee, M. P. Minitti, W. Schlotter, R. G. Moore, C. P. Hauri, S. M. Koohpayeh, V. Scagnoli, G. Ingold, S. L. Johnson, and U. Staub, Large-amplitude spin dynamics driven by a Thz pulse in resonance with an electromagnon, Science 343, 1333–1336 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. W. J. Tabor, A. W. Anderson, and L. G. Van Uitert, “Visible and Infrared Faraday Rotation and Birefringence of Single-Crystal Rare-Earth Orthoferrites,” J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3018–3021 (1970). [CrossRef]  

5. D. F. Evans, “Photomagnetism of triplet states of organic molecules,” Nature 176, 777–778 (1955). [CrossRef]  

6. E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, “Ultrafast spin dynamics in ferromagnetic nickel,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. T. Li, A. Patz, L. Mouchliadis, J. Yan, T. A. Lograsso, I. E. Perakis, and J. Wang, “Femtosecond switching of magnetism via strongly correlated spin-charge quantum excitations,” Nature 496, 69–73 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and Th. Rasing, “Ultrafast optical manipulation of magnetic order,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731–2784 (2010). [CrossRef]  

9. A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. A. Tsvetkov, R. V. Pisarev., and Th. Rasing, “Laser-induced ultrafast spin reorientation in the antiferromagnet TmFeO3,” Nature 49, 850 (2004). [CrossRef]  

10. A. V. Kimel, C. D. Stanciu, P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, V. N. Gridnev, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing, “Optical excitation of antiferromagnetic resonance in TmFeO3,” Phys. Rev. B 74, 060403 (2006). [CrossRef]  

11. A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, A. M. Balbashov, R. V. Pisarev, and Th. Rasing, “Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses”, Nature 435, 655 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. R. Iida, T. Satoh, T. Shimura, K. Kuroda, B. A. Ivanov, Y. Tokunaga, and Y. Tokura, “Spectral dependence of photoinduced spin precession in DyFeO3,” Phys. Rev B 84, 064402 (2011) [CrossRef]  

13. J. de Jong, I. Razdolski, A. M. Kalashnikova, A. Balbashov, R. V. Pisraev, A. Kirilyuk, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, “Coherent control of the route of an ultrafast magnetic phase transition via low-amplitude spin precession,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 157601 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. P. S. Pershan, J. P. van der Ziel, and L. D. Malmstrom, “Optically-Induced Magnetization Resulting from the Inverse Faraday Effect,” Phys. Rev. 143, 574583 (1966).

15. R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, E. Hendry, A. Secchi, J. H. Mentink, M. Eckstein, A. Wu, R. V. Pisarev, V. V. Kruglyak, M. I. Katsnelson, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, “Ultrafast optical modification of exchange interactions in iron oxides,” Nat. Commun. 6, 8190 (2015).

16. S. O. Demokritov, N. M. Kreines, and V. I. Kudinov, “Inelastic scattering of light in the antiferromagnet EuTe,” Sov. Phys. JETP 65, 689-703 (1987)

17. R. R. Subkhangulov, A. B. Henriques, P. H. O. Rappl, E. Abramof, Th. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, “All-optical manipulation and probing of the d-f exchange interaction in EuTe,” Scientific reports 4, 4368 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. H. P. J. Wijn, Numerical Data and Functional Relationships (Springer, 1981).

19. K. P. Belov, A. K. Zvezdin, A. M. Kadomsteva, and I. B. Krinetskii, “Orientational Transitions in Rare-Earth Magnets,” Sov. Phys. JETP 40, 980 (1974).

20. A. J. Kurtzig, “Faraday Rotation in Birefringent Crystals,” Journal of Applied Physics , 42, 3494–3498 (1971). [CrossRef]  

21. K. Vahaplar, A. M. Kalashnikova, A.V. Kimel, D. Hinzke, U. Nowak, R. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, and Th. Rasing, “All-optical magnetization reversal by circularly polarized laser pulses: Experiment and multiscale modeling,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 104402 (2012). [CrossRef]  

22. A. K. Zvezdin and V. M. Matveev, “Theory of the magnetic properties of dysprosium orthoferrite,” Sov. Phys. JETP 50, 543–548 (1979).

23. S. S. Mao, F. Quere, S. Guizard, X. Mao, R.E. Russo, G. Petite, and P. Martin, “Dynamics of femtosecond laser interactions with dielectrics,” Appl. Phys. A. 70, 1695–1709 (2004).

24. H. Schuchert, S. Hfner, and R. Faulhaber, “Optical investigation of DyFeO3,” Zeitschrift fr Physik , 220, 273–279 (1969). [CrossRef]  

25. E. Belorizky, M. A. Fremy, J. P. Gavigan, D. Givord, and H. S. Li, “Evidence in rare earth (R)transition metal (M) intermetallics for a systematic dependence of RM exchange interactions on the nature of the R atom,” J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3971–3973 (1987). [CrossRef]  

26. N.F. Kharchenko, V. V. Eremenko, S. L. Gnatchenko, R. Szymczak, and H. Szymczak, “Magnetic field induced intermediate state in dysprosium orthoferrite,” Solid State Communications 22, 463–465 (1977). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a)–(c) Magneto-optical images of DyFeO3 single crystal in zero magnetic field at three different temperatures in the vicinity of the Morin point TM (ΔT=T−TM). Grey areas at ΔT=−1 K correspond to the collinear antiferromagnetic phase Γ1. Black and white stripe domains detected at ΔT=0 and ΔT=1 K are ferromagnetic domains in the Γ4 phase with magnetizations “up” and “down”, respectively. (d) Changes in the net magnetization upon warming up (red) and cooling down (blue), estimated from the images.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Magneto-optical images of the photo-excited DyFeO3 single crystal at different temperatures. The area excited by a sequence of at least 10 ultrashort laser pulses is shown by solid circle. In the low temperature phase (ΔT=T−TM=−1 K) one can hardly distinguish any contrast between the laser-excited and non-excited areas. A temperature increase reveals that in the area prepared by the laser-excitation the Morin transition occurs at higher temperatures.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Magneto-optical images of the photo-excited DyFeO3 single crystal obtained at different magnetic fields and at fixed temperature ΔT=T−TM=−5 K. Rows (a) and (b) correspond to the experiments performed in positive and negative magnetic field, respectively. Applying a positive field induces the Morin transition into a single domain state with the magnetization “up”. Applying a negative magnetic field induces the Morin transition into a single domain state with the magnetization “down”. The stripe domain pattern corresponds to the intermediate state, i.e. the state in which domains of the two competing phases Γ1 and Γ4 coexist [26]. In the area excited by the sequence of the laser pulses, marked by solid line, the Morin transition occurs at higher fields.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The phase diagram revealing the ratio of the critical magnetic field Hc and the critical temperature ΔTM at the Morin transition, defined as ΔTM = TM (Hc) − TM (0), for the crystal area unaffected by the photo-excitation and the area exposed to the photo-excitation. It is seen that the Morin point in the photo-excited area is clearly shifted. The inset shows changes in the net magnetization upon application of magnetic field, estimated from the images, and the way how the critical magnetic field was determined.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H ex ~ g L 1 g L .
K Dy ( T M ) = K Fe ,
K Dy ( T ) = K Dy ( 0 ) tanh ( E 1 2 k T ) ,
K Dy = ( 1 x ) K Dy 3 + + x K Dy 4 + .
K Dy ( 0 ) ( 1 + 7 9 x ) tanh ( E 1 2 k T ) = K Fe .
1 T M T M x 7 9 sinh ( E 1 k T M ) E 1 k T M .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.