Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Large-scale two-dimensional MoS2 photodetectors by magnetron sputtering

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report on the demonstration of photodetectors based on large scale two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) transition metal dichalcogenides. Excellent film uniformity and precise control of the MoS2 thickness down to a monolayer (~0.75nm) were achieved by magnetron sputtering synthesis approach. In particular, the photodetectors integrated with five MoS2 monolayers exhibit a high photoresponsivity of 1.8 A/W, an external quantum efficiency exceeding 260%, and a photodetectivity of ~5 x 108 Jones for a wavelength of 850 nm, surpassing the performance of mechanically exfoliated based photodetectors.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Atomically thin two-dimensional (2D) layered semiconductors are exciting and emerging materials due to its unique electronic and optical properties compared to its bulk form [1, 2]. At present, the development of optoelectronics components such as photodetectors based on 2D layered semiconductors has been reported to varying success [3]. Although graphene-based photodetectors present several advantages such as absorption over a very wide energy spectrum, ultrafast carrier dynamics, and high carrier mobilities exceeding 10000 cm2V−1s−1, the bandgap of these photodetectors are not easily tunable. Furthermore, the reported photoresponsivities are generally very low (~mA W−1) due to the fast recombination rates. On the contrary, 2D transition metal dichalcogenides such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) shows a thickness dependent bandgap tunability property ranging from its bulk indirect bandgap of 1.3 eV up to a direct bandgap of 1.8 eV in its monolayer form. Moreover, the inherently high absorption coefficients of exceeding 5x107 m−1 in the visible range makes it a promising material for improving optical detection performance. By leveraging on these superior properties, 2D photodetectors utilizing molybdenum disulfide were demonstrated with improved photodetection performance [49] at specific wavelength ranges.

However, one key drawback in most of these reports lies in the fact that the MoS2 films are produced by scotch-tape based mechanical exfoliation method which is not scalable. Furthermore, the poor uniformity and poor repeatability in obtaining the desired film thickness and geometry demands alternative fabrication methods. In this retrospect, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods have been pursued to produce atomically thin MoS2 layered films on insulating substrates [1013], with the lateral sizes approaching centimeter scale. Nonetheless, the additional substrate modification steps required prior to the CVD process may make these approaches less attractive for future commercialization. Alternative large-scale synthesis approaches that will allow for a precise control of the MoS2 film thickness and easy integration into various nanoelectronic and optoelectronic device applications will be an enabling factor for future adoption.

In this work, we demonstrate the integration of large-scale MoS2 crystals for photodetector applications over a wide spectral range from the visible to the near-infrared. The optimized magnetron sputtering synthesis facilitates a precise control of the number of MoS2 layers, allowing for a systematic thickness dependent study on the photoresponse performance. Using a gold-free CMOS compatible fabrication process, the 2D MoS2 photodetectors demonstrated in this work outperforms previous MoS2 photodetectors based on exfoliation and CVD approaches, as well as graphene-based photodetectors.

2. Experiments and results

2.1 Large-scale synthesis of MoS2 films by DC magnetron sputtering

The magnetron sputtering synthesis approach [14] involves the growth of atomically thin MoS2 films by DC magnetron sputtering of Molybdenum target in a vaporized sulfur ambient, using a substrate temperature of 700°C, Sulfur partial pressure of 4.0x10−7 millibars, Argon pressure of 6.0x10−4 millibars and a low sputtering power of 6W. Using this low sputtering power, the growth rate can be controlled to a high precision. The sputtered molybdenum atoms react with the vaporized sulfur atoms before landing onto the heated HfO2/Si substrate to form MoS2 layers. Although the PVD chamber is currently limited to 1x2 cm2 sample size, this deposition technique shows promising scalability to wafer level in meeting the industrial requirements for optical communication applications.

2.2 MoS2 film uniformity and thickness dependent strain

The uniformity of the MoS2 films is confirmed using scanning electron microscopy (FEI, NOVA NanoSEM 230) and Raman spectroscopy (WITEC, alpha 300 R), which adopts the confocal Raman imaging approach with a laser wavelength of 532 nm, a spot size of 300 nm, and a spectral resolution as low as 0.02 cm−1. An integration time of 2 seconds is adopted, with an accumulation of ten times to improve the signal to noise ratio.

Figure 1(a) shows the achievement of excellent thickness uniformity for the large scale MoS2 films down to 2 monolayers (ML), as evident from the matching Raman peaks across three independent locations along the film. The main Raman peak positions corresponding to the in-plane E12g phonon mode and out-of-plane A1g phonon mode are shown to be consistent with the exfoliated MoS2 films. Furthermore, Fig. 1(b) shows a precise control of MoS2 film thicknesses, with an average monolayer thickness of 0.75 nm, and a low deviation of only 5%.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Excellent film uniformity for large scale MoS2 films as thin as two monolayers, as evident from the matching Raman peaks, (b) Precise control of the number of MoS2 layers with low thickness deviation (~5%). Inset shows the AFM step height for the 2 monolayers MoS2 film.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 2(a) shows a typical X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement for the large scale MoS2 films on the HfO2/Si substrate and its deconvolution into their respective Sulphur and Molybdenum core-levels. A thickness dependent analysis of the XPS measurements in Fig. 2(b) showed a clear increase in the S 2s peak binding energy position and a corresponding drop in the linewidth (full width at half-maximum) with increasing number of MoS2 layers, indicating the presence of thickness dependent film strain, and its relaxation with thicker layers [15]. It is worthy of highlight that the S 2s peak binding energy increases from 225.2 eV at 1 ML up to 226.5 eV for a bulk sample and a corresponding reduction in linewidth from 3.5 eV to 1.2 eV. Hence, the chemical bonding configurations for the atomically thin MoS2 layers can be significantly different from the bulk case. This can also be observed from the shift of the Raman peaks corresponding to the A1g and E12g phonon modes in Fig. 2(c). In line with the report by Yang et al. [16] on the study of strain on MoS2 Raman spectra, the PVD-deposited MoS2 films in this work are also expected to be under in-plane uniaxial tensile strain as well, evident from the upshift in the A1g Raman peaks to higher wavenumbers with increasing number of layers. This is coupled with a red shift of its bandgap evident from the extended photoresponsivity of the PVD-deposited MoS2 photodetectors, as will be shown in the subsequent sections. Strain relaxation eventually happens near the front surface, as evident from the increasing root-mean-square surface roughness in Fig. 2(d).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Deconvolution of the XPS spectrum for the 1 monolayer MoS2 film, (b) S 2s peak binding energy position increases, and FWHM decreases as the number of MoS2 layers increases, (c) Shifts of the A1g and E12g phonon modes with increasing number of MoS2 layers, (d) Strain relaxation near the front surface as evident from the increasing RMS surface roughness with more MoS2 layers. Inset: 3D AFM image for the 2 ML MoS2 film.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.3 Fabrication process flow of large scale MoS2 photodetectors

Figure 3 shows a gold-free CMOS-compatible fabrication flow to realize the MoS2 photodetector. First, a double-sided polished planar n-type Si wafer with a resistivity of ~4-8 Ωcm has been utilized, in which the native oxide is removed using a 2% concentration dilute HF dip prior to the deposition of the 5 nm hafnium-dioxide (HfO2) dielectric by atomic layer deposition (ALD) process (CambridgeNanoTech, Savannah Systems). This is followed by the deposition of large-area MoS2 films using DC magnetron sputtering approach to obtain a precise number of MoS2 layers (2 monolayers, 3 monolayers, and 5 monolayers). Details on the sputtering deposition are described in the preceding section. An ultrasonic cleaning in acetone is then performed before the deposition of the metal electrodes (100 nm titanium) by a combination of photolithography (SUSS MicroTec, MA6 mask aligner) and e-beam evaporation (Oerlikon, Univex 450B). The remaining photoresist is then removed by the lift-off process using acetone to obtain the final photodetector device in this work. The resulting large scale MoS2 photodetector as shown in Fig. 3(e) was evaluated across a wide spectral range from the visible to the near-infrared wavelengths (400 to 1200 nm) for varying MoS2 film thicknesses and channel biases.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Fabrication process flow of the large scale MoS2 photodetectors. Starting from a n-type Si wafer (a), a 5 nm HfO2 dielectric is deposited by ALD approach (b), the large-scale magnetron sputtering deposition of MoS2 films (c), and the patterning and deposition of the metal electrodes (d). (e) and (f) show the top-view optical image and scanning electron microscopy image of the completed MoS2 photodetector, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.4 Large scale MoS2 photodetector performance

Figure 4(a) shows the achievement of high photoresponsivity in the large scale MoS2 photodetectors over a wide spectral range from 400 nm to 1200 nm. Interestingly, the photodetectors with 2 ML MoS2 show an extended photoresponse beyond the cutoff wavelength of 800 nm reported in mechanical exfoliated photodetector [17]. This could be attributed to the inherent higher film strain in thinner MoS2 deposition layers which causes a red-shift in its optical bandgap, as corroborated by the XPS measurements. Some possible mechanisms underlying this film strain include (a) stresses arising from the different thermal expansion coefficients of the MoS2 film and the HfO2/silicon substrate due to a high deposition temperatures of ~700°C; and (b) growth stresses arising from crystal structure changes after deposition.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) Increasing MoS2 thickness enhances photoresponsivity due to an increased photoabsorption. (b) Higher external quantum efficiency is achieved with increasing applied bias across a wide spectral regime.

Download Full Size | PDF

Enhanced photoresponsivity in the visible regime with thicker MoS2 layers is also observed, which can be attributed to its high absorption coefficients. For an active MoS2 absorption channel as thin as 2 monolayers, a photoresponsivity of ~0.4 A/W was measured in the visible wavelengths range, which is two orders of magnitude higher than the graphene counterpart. Further increase in the number of absorption layers from two to five increases the photoresponsivity to beyond 1 A/W. In particular, for a 5 ML photodetector, the highest attainable photoresponsivity is 1.8 A/W for a wavelength of 850 nm at a channel bias of 5 V. These results are superior over the monolayer MoS2 phototransistors [5] (7.5 mA/W) and multilayer MoS2 phototransistors [18] (120 mA/W) prepared by mechanical exfoliation method as well as the single-layer graphene-based FET [19, 20] (1 mA/W).

Apart from the utilization of thicker absorption layers, optimizing the applied channel bias can also enhance the photodetector performance as shown in Fig. 4(b). Increasing the channel bias not only enhances the charge collection efficiency, but also result in carrier multiplication through the impact ionization process. This leads to an increase in the external quantum efficiencies (EQE). To illustrate this, the measured EQE of a 5 ML MoS2 photodetector was 30% and 263% at a wavelength of 850 nm for a bias of 1 V and 5 V, respectively. In general, thicker MoS2 layers allows for more photoabsorption and carriers generation, while an increased channel bias facilitates the collection of photogenerated charge carriers and determines the carrier density dependent impact ionization rates.

However, this has to be tradeoff with a reduced photodetectivity as shown in Fig. 5(a), in which the 2 ML photodetector exhibits photodetectivities exceeding 109 Jones, outperforming both the 3 ML and 5 ML photodetectors. This was primarily attributed to the significantly lower dark current in the 2 ML photodetector (~10−9 A), which is one order of magnitude lower than the 3 ML photodetectors, and two orders of magnitude lower than the 5 ML photodetectors. Such a phenomenon has been attributed to the different scattering mechanisms with different MoS2 thicknesses, as reported in [21].

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 (a) Increased photodetectivity (D*) with thinner MoS2 layers due to (b) lower dark current level.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 6 shows the performance benchmarking of our large-scale MoS2 photodetector to other reported photodetectors fabricated using mechanically exfoliated MoS2, CVD MoS2, and graphene films [5, 6, 1820, 22]. Clearly, MoS2 photodetectors enabled by large scale synthesis approach demonstrate promising performance in terms of photoresponsivity and photodetectivity. Such deposition method can be easily scaled up to wafer level to meet the industrial requirements, a distinct advantage over the non-uniform and non-scalable mechanical exfoliation approach.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 The PVD-synthesized MoS2 photodetectors in this work outperform most of the previously reported MoS2 photodetectors using mechanical exfoliation, and CVD techniques, and also Graphene based photodetectors

Download Full Size | PDF

In terms of switching characteristics, the PVD-deposited MoS2 photodetector exhibits stable switching characteristics between the “ON” and “OFF” states with a clear saturation current for both states using the selected wavelength of 850 nm, and a channel bias of 5 V. A rise time of 0.3 s and a fall time of 0.36 s is extracted. The measured fall time outperforms that of mechanically exfoliated single layer MoS2 photodetectors [6,7] which has typical fall time ranging from 2 s to 9 s. While this switching performance pales in comparison to the initial work on single-layer MoS2 phototransistors (~50 ms) reported by Yin et al. [5], the recent work on Schottky metal-semiconductor-metal MoS2 photodetectors [23] (rise time of ~70 µs and fall time of ~110 µs) as well as commercially available silicon-based avalanche photodiodes (~few nanoseconds response) [24], a further reduction to the response time in the PVD-deposited MoS2 photodetectors of this work can be expected with a suitably applied gate bias similar to Ref [6].

3. Conclusion

Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides photodetectors based on large scale MoS2 crystals were successfully demonstrated using a gold-free CMOS compatible process. Synthesized by magnetron sputtering, a precise control of the MoS2 film thickness and uniformity down to monolayer (~0.75nm) was achieved over a large area substrate, with potential of scaling up to wafer level. The MoS2 photodetector was evaluated with a wide spectral response from the visible to the near-infrared wavelengths, which is attributed to its inherently high absorption coefficients. Note worthily, photodetector with five MoS2 monolayers exhibits a high photoresponsivity of 1.8 A/W, an external quantum efficiency of exceeding 260%, and a photodetectivity of ~5x108 Jones for a wavelength of 850nm, showing promise for optoelectronics applications.

Acknowledgment

The authors extend their appreciation to Dr Johnson Wong from the Solar Energy Research Institute of Singapore (SERIS) and Dr Sun Fei from the Institute of Microelectronics, ASTAR for help with setting up the quantum efficiency tool for measurements. This research was supported by NUS Start-up Grants (R-263-000-B21-133 and R-263-000-B21-731).

References

1. Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Coleman, and M. S. Strano, “Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 7(11), 699–712 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. Khotkevich, S. V. Morozov, and A. K. Geim, “Two-dimensional atomic crystals,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(30), 10451–10453 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. F. H. L. Koppens, T. Mueller, P. Avouris, A. C. Ferrari, M. S. Vitiello, and M. Polini, “Photodetectors based on graphene, other two-dimensional materials and hybrid systems,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 9(10), 780–793 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. H. S. Lee, S.-W. Min, Y.-G. Chang, M. K. Park, T. Nam, H. Kim, J. H. Kim, S. Ryu, and S. Im, “MoS₂ nanosheet phototransistors with thickness-modulated optical energy gap,” Nano Lett. 12(7), 3695–3700 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. Z. Yin, H. Li, H. Li, L. Jiang, Y. Shi, Y. Sun, G. Lu, Q. Zhang, X. Chen, and H. Zhang, “Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors,” ACS Nano 6(1), 74–80 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. S. H. Yu, Y. Lee, S. K. Jang, J. Kang, J. Jeon, C. Lee, J. Y. Lee, H. Kim, E. Hwang, S. Lee, and J. H. Cho, “Dye-sensitized MoS2 photodetector with enhanced spectral photoresponse,” ACS Nano 8(8), 8285–8291 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. O. Lopez-Sanchez, D. Lembke, M. Kayci, A. Radenovic, and A. Kis, “Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(7), 497–501 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. W. Zhang, C.-P. Chuu, J.-K. Huang, C.-H. Chen, M.-L. Tsai, Y.-H. Chang, C.-T. Liang, Y.-Z. Chen, Y.-L. Chueh, J.-H. He, M.-Y. Chou, and L.-J. Li, “Ultrahigh-Gain Photodetectors Based on Atomically Thin Graphene-MoS2 Heterostructures,” Sci. Rep. 4, 3826 (2014). [PubMed]  

9. F. Xia, H. Wang, D. Xiao, M. Dubey, and A. Ramasubramaniam, “Two-dimensional material nanophotonics,” Nat. Photonics 8(12), 899–907 (2014). [CrossRef]  

10. Y.-H. Lee, X.-Q. Zhang, W. Zhang, M.-T. Chang, C.-T. Lin, K.-D. Chang, Y.-C. Yu, J. T.-W. Wang, C.-S. Chang, L.-J. Li, and T.-W. Lin, “Synthesis of large-area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition,” Adv. Mater. 24(17), 2320–2325 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. Y. Zhan, Z. Liu, S. Najmaei, P. M. Ajayan, and J. Lou, “Large-Area Vapor-Phase Growth and Characterization of MoS2 Atomic Layers on a SiO2 Substrate,” Small 8(7), 966–971 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. K.-K. Liu, W. Zhang, Y.-H. Lee, Y.-C. Lin, M.-T. Chang, C.-Y. Su, C.-S. Chang, H. Li, Y. Shi, H. Zhang, C.-S. Lai, and L.-J. Li, “Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates,” Nano Lett. 12(3), 1538–1544 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. J. Jeon, S. K. Jang, S. M. Jeon, G. Yoo, Y. H. Jang, J.-H. Park, and S. Lee, “Layer-controlled CVD growth of large-area two-dimensional MoS2 films,” Nanoscale 7(5), 1688–1695 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. J. Tao, J. Chai, X. Lu, L. M. Wong, T. I. Wong, J. Pan, Q. Xiong, D. Chi, and S. Wang, “Growth of wafer-scale MoS2 monolayer by magnetron sputtering,” Nanoscale 7(6), 2497–2503 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. G. Eda, H. Yamaguchi, D. Voiry, T. Fujita, M. Chen, and M. Chhowalla, “Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2,” Nano Lett. 11(12), 5111–5116 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. L. Yang, X. Cui, J. Zhang, K. Wang, M. Shen, S. Zeng, S. A. Dayeh, L. Feng, and B. Xiang, “Lattice strain effects on the optical properties of MoS2 nanosheets,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5649 (2014). [PubMed]  

17. K. F. Mak, C. Lee, J. Hone, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, “Atomically thin MoS₂: a new direct-gap semiconductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105(13), 136805 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. W. Choi, M. Y. Cho, A. Konar, J. H. Lee, G.-B. Cha, S. C. Hong, S. Kim, J. Kim, D. Jena, J. Joo, and S. Kim, “High-detectivity multilayer MoS2 phototransistors with spectral response from ultraviolet to infrared,” Adv. Mater. 24(43), 5832–5836 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. F. Xia, T. Mueller, Y. M. Lin, A. Valdes-Garcia, and P. Avouris, “Ultrafast graphene photodetector,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 4(12), 839–843 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. F. Xia, T. Mueller, R. Golizadeh-Mojarad, M. Freitag, Y. M. Lin, J. Tsang, V. Perebeinos, and P. Avouris, “Photocurrent imaging and efficient photon detection in a graphene transistor,” Nano Lett. 9(3), 1039–1044 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. R. Yang, Z. Wang, and P. X. L. Feng, “Electrical breakdown of multilayer MoS2 field-effect transistors with thickness-dependent mobility,” Nanoscale 6(21), 12383–12390 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. N. Perea-López, Z. Lin, N. R. Pradhan, A. Iñiguez-Rábago, A. L. Elías, A. McCreary, J. Lou, P. M. Ajayan, H. Terrones, L. Balicas, and M. Terrones, “CVD-grown monolayered MoS2 as an effective photosensor operating at low-voltage,” 2D Materials (Basel) 1(1), 011004 (2014). [CrossRef]  

23. D.-S. Tsai, K.-K. Liu, D.-H. Lien, M.-L. Tsai, C.-F. Kang, C.-A. Lin, L.-J. Li, and J.-H. He, “Few-Layer MoS2 with high broadband Photogain and fast optical switching for use in harsh environments,” ACS Nano 7(5), 3905–3911 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. PerkinElmer, “Silicon avalanche photodiodes C30902 series ” (2015), http://www.perkinelmer.com/cmsresources/images/44-3477dts_c30902.pdf.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Excellent film uniformity for large scale MoS2 films as thin as two monolayers, as evident from the matching Raman peaks, (b) Precise control of the number of MoS2 layers with low thickness deviation (~5%). Inset shows the AFM step height for the 2 monolayers MoS2 film.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Deconvolution of the XPS spectrum for the 1 monolayer MoS2 film, (b) S 2s peak binding energy position increases, and FWHM decreases as the number of MoS2 layers increases, (c) Shifts of the A1g and E12g phonon modes with increasing number of MoS2 layers, (d) Strain relaxation near the front surface as evident from the increasing RMS surface roughness with more MoS2 layers. Inset: 3D AFM image for the 2 ML MoS2 film.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Fabrication process flow of the large scale MoS2 photodetectors. Starting from a n-type Si wafer (a), a 5 nm HfO2 dielectric is deposited by ALD approach (b), the large-scale magnetron sputtering deposition of MoS2 films (c), and the patterning and deposition of the metal electrodes (d). (e) and (f) show the top-view optical image and scanning electron microscopy image of the completed MoS2 photodetector, respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Increasing MoS2 thickness enhances photoresponsivity due to an increased photoabsorption. (b) Higher external quantum efficiency is achieved with increasing applied bias across a wide spectral regime.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) Increased photodetectivity (D*) with thinner MoS2 layers due to (b) lower dark current level.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 The PVD-synthesized MoS2 photodetectors in this work outperform most of the previously reported MoS2 photodetectors using mechanical exfoliation, and CVD techniques, and also Graphene based photodetectors
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.