Optical near-field analysis of spherical metals: Application of the FDTD method combined with the ADE method: errata

Takashi Yamaguchi; Takashi Hinata

doi:10.1364/OE.16.004375

Abstract

Equation (8) was incorrect.

Equation (8) in Ref. [1] has to be written as follows:

{\begin{matrix} α_{j} = (\frac{1}{ξ_{j}}) {1 - (\frac{Δ t}{4}) (2 v_{j} + ω_{j}^{2} Δ t)}, \\ β_{j} = \frac{ε_{0} A_{j} ω_{p}^{2} Δ t}{(2 ξ_{j})}, γ_{j} = \frac{ω_{j}^{2} Δ t}{ξ_{j}}, \\ ξ_{j} = 1 + (\frac{Δ t}{4}) (2 v_{j} + ω_{j}^{2} Δ t) . \end{matrix}

The numerical analysis in Ref. [1] was performed with the above correct equation.

References and links

1. T. Yamaguchi and T. Hinata, “Optical near-field analysis of spherical metals: Application of the FDTD method combined with the ADE method”, Opt. Express 15, 11481–11491 (2007). http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?id=141035 [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

{\begin{matrix} α_{j} = (\frac{1}{ξ_{j}}) {1 - (\frac{Δ t}{4}) (2 v_{j} + ω_{j}^{2} Δ t)}, \\ β_{j} = \frac{ε_{0} A_{j} ω_{p}^{2} Δ t}{(2 ξ_{j})}, γ_{j} = \frac{ω_{j}^{2} Δ t}{ξ_{j}}, \\ ξ_{j} = 1 + (\frac{Δ t}{4}) (2 v_{j} + ω_{j}^{2} Δ t) . \end{matrix}

Optical near-field analysis of spherical metals: Application of the FDTD method combined with the ADE method: errata

Abstract

References and links

Cited By

Equations (1)

Optics Express