Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Tip-induced nanoscale domain engineering in x-cut lithium niobate on insulator

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Nanodomain engineering in lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) is critical to realize advanced photonic circuits. Here, we investigate the tip-induced nanodomain formation in x-cut LNOI. The effective electric field exhibits a mirror symmetry, which can be divided into preceding and sequential halves according to the tip movement. Under our configuration, the preceding electric field plays a decisive role rather than the sequential one as in previous reports. The mechanism is attributed to the screening field formed by the preceding field counteracting the effect of the subsequent one. In experiment, we successfully fabricate nanodomain dots, lines, and periodic arrays. Our work offers a useful approach for nanoscale domain engineering in x-cut LNOI, which has potential applications in integrated optoelectronic devices.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) has emerged as a promising platform for integrated optoelectronic applications, offering superior piezoelectric, electro-optic, acousto-optic, and nonlinear optic properties [13]. The successful fabrication of periodically poled LNOI through applying an electric field [48] or a light field [9,10] has significantly enhanced the conversion efficiency of on-chip nonlinear/quantum optic processes, employing the quasi-phase matching (QPM) theory [11]. Recently, advanced applications including narrow-linewidth quantum light sources [12,13] and nonlinear optical neural network [14,15] mandate the reduction of domain sizes to submicron dimensions. Piezoelectric force microscopy (PFM) tip poling has demonstrated its effectiveness in engineering the ferroelectric domain at the nanoscale [16,17]. This technique involves applying a bias voltage to the sample surface using a conductive probe, facilitating domain formation as the localized electric field exceeding lithium niobate (LN) coercive field [18,19]. This technique has been applied to fabricate100-nm-period domain arrays in polar-cut (z-cut) LNOI [20].

However, the applications of PFM-tip poling in nonpolar-cut (for example, x-cut) LNOI has been focused predominantly on isolated wedge domains induced by local switching [2123] and self-organized domain structures [24,25]. In comparison to z-cut LNOI, x-cut LNOI presents distinctive advantages in the realm of integrated optoelectronic devices. Specifically, it facilitates the realization of low-loss and ultra-wideband electro-optic modulators, eliminating the need for a bottom electrode [2628]. Moreover, x-cut LNOI offers the possibility to control the growth of domain lines along a predesigned angle relative to the z-direction, which is useful in nanoelectronic [6,29,30] and acoustic devices [31,32]. It is critical to explore the nanodomain growth mechanism and realize controllable fabrication of periodic nanodomain array in x-cut LNOI for practical applications.

In this paper, we investigate the PFM-tip-induced domain formation mechanism in x-cut LNOI. The tip electric field presents a tail-to-tail (or head-to-head) distribution when applying a positive (or negative) bias voltage. According to the moving direction of the tip, the electric field can be divided into the preceding and sequential halves. Interestingly, the polarization direction of the generated domain is decided by the preceding component of the electric field rather than the sequential one as in previous reports [33]. The mechanism can be attributed to that the screening field formed by the preceding field counteracts the effect of the subsequent field. In experiment, we have successfully fabricated drop-shaped domain dots, domain lines, and periodic domain arrays. Our work paves a way to precisely fabricate nanoscale domain structures in x-cut LNOI for advanced applications in integrated optics and nanoelectronics.

2. Methods

In experiment, we use an x-cut LNOI wafer (Fig. 1) consisting of a 500-nm-thick LN thin film, a Cr/Au/Cr (30 nm/100 nm/10 nm) conductive layer, a SiO2 buffer layer (2 µm) and an LN substrate (500 µm). The scanning probe microscope is a commercial system (MFP-3D, Asylum Research, USA) equipped with gold coated probes (Multi-75GB-G, Budget Sensors, USA). The radius of curvature of the tip (Rtip) is 25 nm. The fabrication of domain structures is conducted in Litho mode using the conductive probe as the top electrode. The metal interlayer of LNOI serves as the bottom electrode, grounded through silver glue. The probe can be moved along a designed path within the y-z plane. The visualization of domain structures employs a dual AC resonance tracking PFM in lateral mode working at an AC driving voltage of 0.5 V and a resonant frequency of 650 kHz. The experiments are performed in room temperature with a relative humidity of about 40%. The experimental data are recorded and analyzed using Igor software.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of PFM tip poling in x-cut LNOI.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental results and discussions

We numerically analyze the tip electric field as shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). Considering that the spontaneous polarization of LN is along + z direction, the effective component Ez of the electric field is depicted, which presents a head-to-head (Fig. 2(a)) or tail–to-tail (Fig. 2(b)) distribution, corresponding to a negative or positive bias voltage, respectively. The symmetry of the electric field indicates that the domain poling depends on the moving direction of the tip.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) and (b) depict the simulated spatial distributions of the effective component Ez of the tip-induced electric field by applying a bias voltage of −100 V and +100 V, respectively. The white and black arrows represent the directions of Ez and the LN spontaneous polarization Ps. (c) and (d) are the lateral PFM phase images of the drop-shaped domains by applying a negative and positive bias, respectively. (e) and (f) show the corresponding lateral PFM amplitude images. The pulse amplitude ranges from 50 V to 120 V and the durations is extended from 0.1 s to 30 s.

Download Full Size | PDF

In experiment, we first write individual domains by applying single pulses with various amplitude (50 V ∼ 120 V) and duration (0.1 s ∼ 30 s) to each point on the x-cut LN surface. Figures 2(c)–2(f) show the generated domains with their sizes increasing as the voltage is enhanced or the duration is extended. The domain shape is quite different from the previously reported wedged domains [2123]. This deviation can be attributed to the presence of the metal conductive layer beneath the LN thin film. Generally, the domain significantly elongates along the polar axis in response to the depolarization field generated by unscreened charged kinks [23,34]. In contrast, the charge screening is more effective in our experiment because the grounded metal layer establishes an efficient channel for charges. As a result, the growth of domains is mainly confined within the vicinity of the tip.

Interestingly, the domain poling exhibits distinct behaviors by applying positive or negative bias. Under the same pulse amplitude and duration, the length of the domain induced by a negative bias pulse (Fig. 2(c)) is slighter longer than that induced by a positive one (Fig. 2(d)). This morphological distinction can be attributed to the lower mobility of positive carriers (for charge screening in Fig. 2(c)) compared to negative ones (for charge screening in Fig. 2(d)) [35]. Additionally, domain backswitching is observed in Fig. 2(c) rather than in Fig. 2(d) for the same reason [21,36].

In the fabrication of domain lines, we employ a DC-biased tip moving along a predetermined path. As shown in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), the tip electrical field can be divided into the preceding half and the subsequent half, each with opposite directions. Notably, the domain poling is dependent on the moving direction of the tip. One might anticipate that the final domain polarization direction aligns with the subsequent electric field direction since it interacts with the LN material last (Fig. 3(a)) [33]. However, experimental results reveal the opposite (Fig. 3(b)). For example, when applying a positive voltage to the tip, the electric field Ez exhibits a tail-to-tail distribution. Under our experimental conditions, the domain lines can only be written by moving the positively biased tip along the -z direction antiparallel to the original LN polarization. In this case, the final LN domain polarization aligns with the preceding half of Ez. This can be explained by the mechanism in which the influence of the preceding field hinders the impact of the subsequent one. Following the creation of an LN domain by the preceding field, an electric field generated by the screening charges emerges and counteracts the effects of the subsequent field. Figures 3(c) and 3(d) present the lateral PFM phase images of the produced domain lines. One can observe that the domain linewidth increases as reducing the scanning speed or enhancing the voltage. At a voltage of 40 V, the domain linewidth continuously decreases from 155 nm to 85 nm as increasing scanning velocity from 0.1 µm/s to 20 µm/s (Fig. 3(c)). When keeping the scanning velocity at 20 µm/s, the domain linewidth increases from 88 nm to 564 nm as increasing the bias voltage from 40 V to 120 V (Fig. 3(d)). The dependencies of the linewidths on the scanning velocity and bias voltage fit well with negatively logarithmic (Fig. 3(e)) and linear (Fig. 3(f)) functions, respectively. This can be understood by the domain growth mechanism based on the sideways movement of the domain wall [37,38].

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) The schematic of tip-induced domain poling without considering charge screening. The final domain polarization direction is consistent with the subsequent electric field direction. (b) shows the scheme with an effective charge screening, in which the final LN domain polarization is decided by the preceding half of Ez. (c) and (d) show the lateral PFM phase images of the nanodomain lines by moving a positively-biased tip along the -z direction by using various scanning speeds and bias voltages, respectively. The dependencies of domain linewidths on the scanning velocity and bias voltage satisfy a negatively logarithmic (e) and linear (f) functions, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

In our experiment, the domain line writing by using a negatively biased tip is also dominant by the preceding electric field. Since the electric field in this case features a head-to-head distribution, the domain lines can be written by moving the tip in the same direction (+z) as the original LN polarization. Figure 4 presents the lateral PFM phase images of domain lines. By adjusting the bias voltage and scanning velocity, the domain linewidth varies from ∼100 nm to ∼1 µm in our experiment. The dependencies of the linewidths on the scanning velocity and bias voltage are shown in Fig. 4(c) and Fig. 4(f), respectively.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a)-(b) and (d)-(e) show the nanodomain lines fabricated by scanning a negatively-biased tip in the + z direction. The dependencies of domain linewidths on the scanning velocity and bias voltage satisfy a negatively logarithmic (c) and linear (f) functions, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Finally, we investigate the fabrication of periodic domain structures in x-cut LNOI. Figure 5(a) shows an 800-nm-period domain array written by using a + 95 V bias voltage and a 15 µm/s scanning speed. The tip moves in the -z direction antiparallel to the original LN polarization. In addition, our technique is capable of writing domain lines along a specific angle θ relative to the + z direction. Figure 5(b) shows two examples with θ being 20° and 10°, respectively. The periods are 600 nm and 850 nm, respectively. The details in the enlarged patterns indicate high-quality fabrication of periodic domain array through tip poling.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. The fabrication of periodic domain structures. (a) The domain array is fabricated at a 95 V voltage and a 15 µm/s scanning speed. The period is 800 nm. (b) The periodic domain structures are arranged along an angle of 20° (left) and 10° (right) relative to the + z direction.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have investigated the nanodomain formation in x-cut LNOI and achieved the successful fabrication of domain dots, lines, and periodic arrays. The charge screening is critical to LN domain poling. In the formation of individual domains, effective charge screening confines the domain growth within the vicinity of the tip. During the domain writing, the formation of the screening field counteracts the influence of the subsequent component of the tip electric field. In addition, we demonstrate the fabrication of nanodomain arrays along a designed angle relative to the z direction. Considering the dependence of domain-wall conductivity on this angle, it has potential applications in nanoelectronic devices. Notably, the metal interlayer could cause extra loss in optical applications. One may use thin-film transfer or chemical etching techniques to avoid this problem [3941]. Our results reveal the intrinsic mechanism of nanodomain engineering in x-cut LNOI and pave a way for future applications in high-performance integrated optoelectronic devices.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (022YFA1205100, 2021YFA1400400); National Natural Science Foundation of China (91950206, 92163216); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M731587, 2023T160303); Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20230768); Yuxiu Young Scholars Program of Nanjing University; Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210052).

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. D. Zhu, L. Shao, M. Yu, et al., “Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 13(2), 242–352 (2021). [CrossRef]  

2. G. Chen, N. Li, J. D. Ng, et al., “Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,” Adv. Photonics 4(03), 034003 (2022). [CrossRef]  

3. M. G. Vazimali and S. Fathpour, “Applications of thin-film lithium niobate in nonlinear integrated photonics,” Adv. Photonics 4(03), 034001 (2022). [CrossRef]  

4. J. Zhao, M. Rüsing, U. A. Javid, et al., “Shallow-etched thin-film lithium niobate waveguides for highly-efficient second-harmonic generation,” Opt. Express 28(13), 19669–19682 (2020). [CrossRef]  

5. Y. Zhang, H. Li, T. Ding, et al., “Scalable, fiber-compatible lithium-niobate-on-insulator micro-waveguides for efficient nonlinear photonics,” Optica 10(6), 688–693 (2023). [CrossRef]  

6. Y. Qian, Y. Zhang, J. Xu, et al., “Domain-Wall p-n junction in lithium niobate thin film on an insulator,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 17(4), 044011 (2022). [CrossRef]  

7. J. Mishra, T. P. McKenna, E. Ng, et al., “Mid-infrared nonlinear optics in thin-film lithium niobate on sapphire,” Optica 8(6), 921–924 (2021). [CrossRef]  

8. Y. Niu, C. Lin, X. Liu, et al., “Optimizing the efficiency of a periodically poled LNOI waveguide using in situ monitoring of the ferroelectric domains,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 116(10), 101104 (2020). [CrossRef]  

9. A. Boes, D. Yudistira, T. Crasto, et al., “Ultraviolet laser induced domain inversion on chromium coated lithium niobate crystals,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(2), 241–254 (2014). [CrossRef]  

10. X. Xu, T. Wang, P. Chen, et al., “Femtosecond laser writing of lithium niobate ferroelectric nanodomains,” Nature 609(7927), 496–501 (2022). [CrossRef]  

11. J. A. Armstrong, N. Bloembergen, J. Ducuing, et al., “Interactions between light waves in a nonlinear dielectric,” Phys. Rev. 127(6), 1918–1939 (1962). [CrossRef]  

12. K.-H. Luo, V. Ansari, M. Massaro, et al., “Counter-propagating photon pair generation in a nonlinear waveguide,” Opt. Express 28(3), 3215–3225 (2020). [CrossRef]  

13. E. Alkhazraji, W. W. Chow, F. Grillot, et al., “Linewidth narrowing in self-injection-locked on-chip lasers,” Light: Sci. Appl. 12(1), 162 (2023). [CrossRef]  

14. P. Chen, X. Xu, T. Wang, et al., “Laser nanoprinting of 3D nonlinear holograms beyond 25000 pixels-per-inch for inter-wavelength-band information processing,” Nat. Commun. 14(1), 5523 (2023). [CrossRef]  

15. Q. Guo, R. Sekine, L. Ledezma, et al., “Femtojoule femtosecond all-optical switching in lithium niobate nanophotonics,” Nat. Photonics 16(9), 625–631 (2022). [CrossRef]  

16. E. Soergel, “Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM),” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44(46), 464003 (2011). [CrossRef]  

17. A. Gruverman, M. Alexe, and D. Meier, “Piezoresponse force microscopy and nanoferroic phenomena,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 1661 (2019). [CrossRef]  

18. G. Rosenman, P. Urenski, A. Agronin, et al., “Submicron ferroelectric domain structures tailored by high-voltage scanning probe microscopy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(1), 103–105 (2003). [CrossRef]  

19. R. V. Gainutdinov, T. R. Volk, and H. H. Zhang, “Domain formation and polarization reversal under atomic force microscopy-tip voltages in ion-sliced LiNbO3 films on SiO2/LiNbO3 substrates,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 107(16), 162903 (2015). [CrossRef]  

20. J. Ma, X. Cheng, N. Zheng, et al., “Fabrication of 100-nm-period domain structure in lithium niobate on insulator,” Opt. Express 31(23), 37464–37471 (2023). [CrossRef]  

21. A. V. Ievlev, D. O. Alikin, A. N. Morozovska, et al., “Symmetry breaking and electrical frustration during tip-induced polarization switching in the nonpolar cut of lithium niobate single crystals,” ACS Nano 9(1), 769–777 (2015). [CrossRef]  

22. D. O. Alikin, A. V. Ievlev, A. P. Turygin, et al., “Tip-induced domain growth on the non-polar cuts of lithium niobate single-crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(18), 182902 (2015). [CrossRef]  

23. V. Y. Shur, E. V. Pelegova, A. P. Turygin, et al., “Forward growth of ferroelectric domains with charged domain walls. Local switching on non-polar cuts,” J. Appl. Phys. 129(4), 044103 (2021). [CrossRef]  

24. A. Turygin, D. Alikin, Y. Alikin, et al., “The formation of self-organized domain structures at non-polar cuts of lithium niobate as a result of local switching by an SPM tip,” Materials 10(10), 1143 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. A. P. Turygin, Y. M. Alikin, E. A. Neradovskaia, et al., “Self-organized domain formation by moving the biased SPM tip,” Ferroelectrics 542(1), 70–76 (2019). [CrossRef]  

26. C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, et al., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature 562(7725), 101–104 (2018). [CrossRef]  

27. M. Zhang, C. Wang, P. Kharel, et al., “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators: when performance meets scalability,” Optica 8(5), 652–667 (2021). [CrossRef]  

28. M. Xu and X. Cai, “Advances in integrated ultra-wideband electro-optic modulators [Invited],” Opt. Express 30(5), 7253–7274 (2022). [CrossRef]  

29. A. A. Esin, A. R. Akhmatkhanov, and V. Y. Shur, “Tilt control of the charged domain walls in lithium niobate,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 114(9), 092901 (2019). [CrossRef]  

30. X. Chai, J. Jiang, Q. Zhang, et al., “Nonvolatile ferroelectric field-effect transistors,” Nat. Commun. 11(1), 2811 (2020). [CrossRef]  

31. Y. Zhu, N. Ming, W. Jiang, et al., “High-frequency resonance in acoustic superlattice of LiNbO3 crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 53(23), 2278–2280 (1988). [CrossRef]  

32. D. Yudistira, S. Benchabane, D. Janner, et al., “Surface acoustic wave generation in ZX-cut LiNbO3 superlattices using coplanar electrodes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(5), 052901 (2009). [CrossRef]  

33. Y. Qian, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, et al., “Graphical direct writing of macroscale domain structures with nanoscale spatial resolution in nonpolar-cut lithium niobate on insulators,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 17(5), 054049 (2022). [CrossRef]  

34. P. Mokrý, A. K. Tagantsev, and J. Fousek, “Pressure on charged domain walls and additional imprint mechanism in ferroelectrics,” Phys. Rev. B 75(9), 094110 (2007). [CrossRef]  

35. E. Strelcov, A. V. Ievlev, S. Jesse, et al., “Direct probing of charge injection and polarization-controlled ionic mobility on ferroelectric LiNbO3 surfaces,” Adv. Mater. 26(6), 958–963 (2014). [CrossRef]  

36. Y. Kim, S. Bühlmann, S. Hong, et al., “Injection charge assisted polarization reversal in ferroelectric thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(7), 072910 (2007). [CrossRef]  

37. R. C. Miller and G. Weinreich, “Mechanism for the sidewise motion of 180° domain walls in barium titanate,” Phys. Rev. 117(6), 1460–1466 (1960). [CrossRef]  

38. M. Lilienblum and E. Soergel, “Determination of the effective coercive field of ferroelectrics by piezoresponse force microscopy,” J. Appl. Phys. 110(5), 052012 (2011). [CrossRef]  

39. M. Xu, W. Chen, M. He, et al., “Michelson interferometer modulator based on hybrid silicon and lithium niobate platform,” APL Photonics 4(10), 100802 (2019). [CrossRef]  

40. L. Wang, X. Zhang, and F. Chen, “Efficient second harmonic generation in a reverse-polarization dual-layer crystalline thin film nanophotonic waveguide,” Laser Photonics Rev. 15(12), 2100409 (2021). [CrossRef]  

41. Z. Hao, L. Zhang, W. Mao, et al., “Second-harmonic generation using d33 in periodically poled lithium niobate microdisk resonators,” Photonics Res. 8(3), 311–317 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of PFM tip poling in x-cut LNOI.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) and (b) depict the simulated spatial distributions of the effective component Ez of the tip-induced electric field by applying a bias voltage of −100 V and +100 V, respectively. The white and black arrows represent the directions of Ez and the LN spontaneous polarization Ps. (c) and (d) are the lateral PFM phase images of the drop-shaped domains by applying a negative and positive bias, respectively. (e) and (f) show the corresponding lateral PFM amplitude images. The pulse amplitude ranges from 50 V to 120 V and the durations is extended from 0.1 s to 30 s.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) The schematic of tip-induced domain poling without considering charge screening. The final domain polarization direction is consistent with the subsequent electric field direction. (b) shows the scheme with an effective charge screening, in which the final LN domain polarization is decided by the preceding half of Ez. (c) and (d) show the lateral PFM phase images of the nanodomain lines by moving a positively-biased tip along the -z direction by using various scanning speeds and bias voltages, respectively. The dependencies of domain linewidths on the scanning velocity and bias voltage satisfy a negatively logarithmic (e) and linear (f) functions, respectively.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a)-(b) and (d)-(e) show the nanodomain lines fabricated by scanning a negatively-biased tip in the + z direction. The dependencies of domain linewidths on the scanning velocity and bias voltage satisfy a negatively logarithmic (c) and linear (f) functions, respectively.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. The fabrication of periodic domain structures. (a) The domain array is fabricated at a 95 V voltage and a 15 µm/s scanning speed. The period is 800 nm. (b) The periodic domain structures are arranged along an angle of 20° (left) and 10° (right) relative to the + z direction.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.