Open Access
Add to BibSonomy
Abstract
We present an integrated hybrid semiconductor-dielectric (InP-Si3N4) waveguide laser that generates frequency combs at a wavelength around 1.5 μm with a record-low intrinsic optical linewidth of 34 kHz. This is achieved by extending the cavity photon lifetime using a low-loss dielectric waveguide circuit. In our experimental demonstration, the on-chip, effective optical path length of the laser cavity is extended to 6 cm. The resulting linewidth narrowing shows the high potential of on-chip, highly coherent frequency combs with direct electrical pumping, based on hybrid and heterogeneous integrated circuits making use of low-loss dielectric waveguides.
© 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement
1. Introduction
Providing optical frequency comb sources in a chip-sized format is of high interest for a wide range of fields, for instance for dual-comb sensing [1], metrology [2], coherent optical communications [3], and microwave photonics [4]. There are two central requirements regarding the optical coherence of the generated combs. The first is a highly equidistant spacing of the comb lines, i.e., a high mutual coherence of the comb lines, which shows up as narrowband beat frequencies of the comb lines. This requirement is usually fulfilled well via the nonlinear process that imposes mode-locking, e.g., four-wave mixing in Kerr combs [5] or saturable absorbers in passively mode-locked lasers [6], resulting in very narrow RF beat notes, e.g., in the sub-kHz range [6]. The second requirement is that the spectral linewidth of the individual comb lines has to be extremely narrow, preferably in the kHz range or below. This corresponds to having a low frequency jitter of the optical output. However, chip-based diode laser frequency combs, which are most attractive due to direct pumping with an electric current, usually fail to meet this requirement. This failure is due to a combination of intrinsic properties of semiconductor lasers, namely a short cavity length, high optical losses, and strong gain-index coupling [7]. The resulting linewidths are typically tens of MHz in monolithically integrated diode lasers, e.g., indium phosphide (InP) lasers [8].
Providing a novel approach to overcome this linewidth limitation, i.e., to narrow the linewidth of the individual comb lines in chip-based diode lasers, is the main achievement of this paper. Microring resonators pumped by diode lasers [5] form an important alternative to generate frequency combs, based on Kerr comb generation. Although Kerr combs can ultimately provide a larger spectral coverage than diode laser combs, that approach will not be considered here due to its larger complexity, involving an additional optical pump threshold. Instead, we focus on the generation of a low-jitter comb with a diode laser that is directly pumped by an electric current.
A method which drastically improves the intrinsic linewidth of diode lasers (also named Schawlow-Townes limit [9], fundamental linewidth or quantum linewidth), while maintaining a chip-sized format, is to extend the cavity photon lifetime [10] via hybrid or heterogeneous integration. In hybrid integrated lasers, a semiconductor amplifier is butt-coupled to a low-loss dielectric waveguide circuit, e.g., based on a silicon nitride (Si3N4) core with a silicon oxide (SiO2) cladding [11], while in heterogeneous integrated lasers usually a III/V semiconductor is evanescently coupled to a low-loss waveguide circuit, e.g., based on silicon (Si) [12]. Using these approaches, the linewidth of single-frequency semiconductor lasers was gradually reduced into the kHz range [11–14], and via hybrid integration with a Si3N4 circuit even into the sub-kHz range (290 Hz) [15]. These findings suggest that extending this approach to multiple frequencies is a highly promising route to realize chip-based, narrow-linewidth frequency comb lasers.
Chip-based frequency comb lasers with an extended cavity have already been demonstrated in the form of heterogeneous integrated mode-locked lasers [6, 16–20]. The narrowest intrinsic linewidth, i.e., the lowest intrinsic comb jitter in a passively mode-locked integrated semiconductor laser reported so far, is 250 kHz with an InP-Si laser [6]. However, that approach has a fundamental problem which can limit the achievable intrinsic linewidth. Namely, the cavity photon lifetime is extended using a waveguide circuit made of a low-bandgap material (silicon), having only a slightly larger bandgap (1.1 eV) than the generated light (0.8 eV). The low bandgap leads not only to a higher linear loss than in high-bandgap dielectrics [21], but also to nonlinear losses due to two-photon absorption (TPA), which can deteriorate the achievable intrinsic linewidth [22]. Compared to continuous-wave (CW) lasers, these nonlinear losses are expected to be large in mode-locked lasers, due to the relatively high intensity of the pulses that travel through the resonator, if it consists entirely of semiconductor material. For instance, with 10 mW of average power, a 7 cm long silicon waveguide feedback circuit would have a rather small TPA in the order of a percent for a CW laser [23]. However, already with a few modes, for instance 10 equally strong modes, the two-photon loss becomes clearly noticeable (estimated 60%).
Here, we defeat such problems by extending the photon lifetime via low-loss, high-contrast dielectric waveguides. A most advanced platform with such properties is the Si3N4/SiO2 waveguide platform, which provides bandgaps larger than 5 and 8 eV, respectively, low propagation losses down to 0.001 dB/cm, a high index contrast of 0.5, and exceptional maturity in terms of design and functionality [24].
In the following, we report a fully integrated, narrow intrinsic linewidth frequency comb laser based on dielectric waveguides. Using a hybrid integrated InP-Si3N4 laser to generate frequency combs, we measure the linewidth of a single comb line by beating the output with a narrowband reference laser. We observe a low intrinsic linewidth of 34 kHz. This is, to our knowledge, much lower than reported for any fully integrated frequency comb laser so far. Although the comb currently comprises only a small number of lines (17) at a spacing of 5.3 GHz, this result confirms the strong potential for realizing on-chip, narrow-linewidth frequency combs via hybrid and heterogeneously integrated semiconductor lasers making use of low-loss dielectric waveguides.
2. Methods
2.1. Laser description
The hybrid laser investigated in this work is shown schematically in Fig. 1. The laser cavity is formed using an InP quantum well based, double-pass reflective semiconductor optical amplifier (RSOA, fabricated by the Fraunhofer Heinrich Hertz Institute) and a Si3N4 chip. The latter contains a circuit with two microring resonators (MRRs) that form a feedback mirror with adjustable spectral filtering. The Si3N4 waveguides, having a symmetric double-stripe cross section [25], offer a low propagation loss of about 0.1 dB/cm and a wide transparency range (400 nm to 2.35 μm).
Light is generated at a wavelength around 1.54 μm in the RSOA, which is equipped on its back facet with a highly-reflective (HR) coating and on its front facet with an anti-reflection (AR) coating. At the InP-Si3N4 interface, the waveguides are angled with respect to the facet normal, to minimize back reflections into the guided mode of the RSOA. In the Si3N4 chip, the light first passes through a section where an extra optical phase can be imposed via the thermo-optic effect using a resistive electric heater, to fine-tune the spectral positions of the longitudinal laser cavity modes. Next, the light is guided through two sequential microring resonators (MRR 1 and MRR 2) with slightly different ring radii (ρ1 = 136.5 μm and ρ2 = 140.9 μm, respectively), which are thermo-optically tunable as well. The power coupling between each of the rings and the corresponding straight waveguides, κ2, was designed to have a value of 10%. The thermo-optic heaters require a power between 300 and 400 mW to achieve a π phase shift.
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the hybrid waveguide laser (not to scale). The RSOA is equipped on its left-hand facet with an HR coating that has a power reflectivity R1. The Si3N4 circuit contains a phase section and a feedback mirror (blue tinted area) which has an effective power reflectivity R2. This mirror comprises two sequential (Vernier) microring resonators (MRRs), denoted by MRR 1 and MRR 2, with radii ρ1 and ρ2. The power coupling between each of the rings and the corresponding straight waveguides is denoted by κ2. The phase section and the MRRs can be tuned using resistive electric heaters, which are indicated in yellow.
The purpose of the MRRs is twofold. First, the resonators increase the cavity photon lifetime, because they pass light in multiple roundtrips [26], which lowers the intrinsic linewidth. Second, the MRRs form a spectral Vernier filter, which we use to induce the generation of a comb spectrum, as will be discussed in Section 2.2.
After passing through the MRRs, part of the light (20% of the power) is returned to the InP amplifier using a directional coupler. The other part (80% of the power) is guided to the edge of the Si3N4 chip and forms the laser output. Changing the feedback level would change the output power. Back reflections from the InP-Si3N4 interface and from the fiber facet are sufficiently low, since our measured optical spectra do not show a 60 GHz or 8.7 GHz modulation that would correspond to these reflections.
The RSOA has a single-pass geometrical length L1 of 700 μm, and a group index n1 of about 3.6 at a wavelength of 1.5 μm. The effective [26] half-roundtrip length of the Si3N4 feedback circuit (including multiple roundtrips in the MRRs), L2, is 1.6 cm at the Vernier filter resonance. This value was obtained by taking half of the effective length of the ring resonators, calculated as in [26], and adding the remaining length of the Si3N4 waveguide circuit (about 6.5 mm), which was estimated from the chip’s mask layout. The group index of the feedback circuit, n2, is 1.715. The corresponding effective roundtrip optical path length of the laser cavity, Lcav, given by 2(n1L1 + n2L2), is about 6 cm.
To improve stability and reproducibility, the laser is hybrid integrated, i.e., the RSOA and Si3N4 chips are aligned for optimum mode matching and then fixed permanently [27]. A single-mode polarization-maintaining fiber is bonded to the output waveguide of the Si3N4 chip. The RSOA and the resistive heaters on the Si3N4 chip are wire bonded and mounted inside a standard butterfly housing on a Peltier temperature controller. The laser is mounted on a printed circuit board with computer controlled voltage and current drivers.
2.2. Inducing comb generation
Usually, Vernier filters and phase sections are tuned for the purpose of restricting laser oscillation to a single frequency by providing narrowband, strong feedback for only a single laser mode [28–30]. However, multi-frequency comb generation, which is of interest here, can be imposed as well, by adjusting the spectral position of the two central, adjacent longitudinal modes of the laser cavity symmetrically around the filter’s transmission peak, via tuning the phase section. This spectral configuration is illustrated in Fig. 2, which shows the calculated spectral shape of the filter’s transmission peak as a solid blue line and the longitudinal modes of the laser cavity as gray lines. The non-equidistant mode spacing is in full agreement with the A, B, and F feedback factor theory [31]. We found experimentally that equidistant frequency comb spectra are generated if the laser modes are tuned using the phase section, such that the two center modes receive an equal amount of feedback.
Fig. 2 Calculated spectral shape of the Vernier filter’s transmission peak (solid blue line) and the spectral positions of the longitudinal laser cavity modes (gray lines). Positioning the laser modes as shown, with two central modes (labeled 1 and 2) receiving an equal amount of feedback (horizontal dashed line), is found to result in the generation of a frequency comb spectrum.
2.3. Laser characterization
The laser output was characterized using an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA; Finisar WaveAnalyzer 1500S, 180 MHz resolution bandwidth). To characterize the output spectra with higher resolution, we recorded the mutual beating of the spectral lines, and the beating of single comb lines with an external single-frequency reference laser, using a fast photodetector (Discovery Semiconductors DSC30S, 20 GHz bandwidth) and an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA; Agilent E4405B Spectrum Analyzer).
Of main interest is to measure the linewidth of a single spectral line, by recording beat notes between the hybrid laser and reference laser, because this forms a measure for the jitter of the diode laser comb. As the reference laser we used an extended cavity laser (SANTEC TSL-210), set to an output power of 3.2 mW. At this power, the reference laser has an intrinsic linewidth of 6 kHz, measured using the self-heterodyne technique [32]. To protect the hybrid laser and reference laser from undesired back reflections, the output of each laser was first sent through an optical isolator (isolation level at least 28 dB). Using a 2×2 fiber coupler, the light was superimposed and guided to the fast photodetector. The wings of the RF spectrum follow a Lorentzian lineshape. To determine the intrinsic linewidth, we extract the width of this Lorentzian lineshape component. Near its center, the RF spectrum was found to be broadened with a near-Gaussian shape which is attributed to technical noise, such as from thermal or acoustic fluctuations and noise in the pump current, which are present in both the hybrid laser and the reference laser. This technical noise component can be removed with electronic frequency stabilization to reference cavities [33] or absolute frequency references [34].
3. Results and discussion
3.1. General laser behavior
If the phase section is tuned such that one longitudinal laser mode coincides with the Vernier filter transmission peak, the laser shows single-frequency oscillation, with a high side-mode-suppression ratio of more than 50 dB. The output power is more than 10 mW at a pump current of 220 mA, and the laser threshold current is 12 mA. By temperature-tuning of the MRRs, the laser frequency can be tuned via mode hops over a wide spectral range of about 52 nm. However, when detuning the phase section such that two modes receive equal optical feedback, as depicted in Fig. 2, the laser generates an optical comb spectrum. Figure 3 displays a representative example where 17 discrete, equidistant lines can be identified. The total output power is 2 mW. The power of the strongest line lies more than 50 dB above the noise level. The power of the spectral lines decreases strongly towards the edges of the spectrum, a feature that can likely be improved by using a filter with reduced steepness in the wings of its transmission spectrum. The frequency spacing of the lines is 5.3 GHz, which matches well with the expected free spectral range (FSR) of the laser cavity. The comb spectrum remains stable for more than several minutes without any thermal control of the heaters.
To inspect the mutual coherence of the comb lines, Fig. 4 shows the RF beat spectrum of the laser output for a pump current of 190 mA, recorded using a video bandwidth and resolution bandwidth of 3 MHz each, with a recording range of 13.2 GHz. Within the 13.2-GHz range of the RF spectrum analyzer, one can see two narrow peaks at about 5.5 GHz and 11 GHz. The two peaks lie more than 40 and 30 dB, respectively, above the noise level. A close-up of the fundamental peak, measured with a resolution bandwidth and video bandwidth of 1 MHz each, is shown in the inset. Analyzing this spectrum with a Voigt fit yields a very narrow Lorentzian component of 18 kHz, FWHM (technical noise Gaussian component is 1.8 MHz). The observation of a single RF peak at the FSR of the laser cavity and the low Lorentzian bandwidth of the RF peak indicate the presence of mode-locking. Such mode-locking without a saturable absorber has often been observed in quantum well lasers [35–38] due to spatial hole burning and four-wave-mixing via carrier density pulsations, which are driven by the beating of adjacent longitudinal modes [39]. The effect has been observed [40] and modeled [41] for quantum dot lasers as well.
Fig. 3 Measured frequency comb spectrum, using a pump current of 198 mA. The corresponding total output power is 2 mW.
We note that due to the presence of resonators (the MRRs) in the laser cavity, the FSR is a function of frequency. We calculate that the FSR varies from 5 GHz at the resonance peak of the Vernier filter to 11 GHz (off-resonance). Nevertheless, both the optical and RF spectrum (Figs. 3 and 4) show that the measured spectral lines are equidistant. This provides direct confirmation that the laser is mode-locked, and is not simply a multi-mode laser oscillating at the center frequencies of the cavity resonances. Locking of modes to equidistant frequencies that can be relatively far off the cavity mode center frequencies is enabled by relatively high roundtrip loss (see Table 1). We have confirmed the described behavior via our numerical model [42] based on [44], which predicts exactly equidistant output frequencies as well.
Fig. 4 Measured RF beat spectrum using a pump current of 190 mA. The inset shows a close-up of the fundamental RF beat tone. A Voigt fit analysis of the spectrum shown at the inset yielded a Gaussian component with a 1.8 MHz linewidth and a Lorentzian component with an 18 kHz linewidth.
Table 1. Parameters Used for Calculations
3.2. Spectral linewidth measurements
To obtain quantitative information on the frequency jitter of the comb, we measured the intrinsic optical linewidth of the strongest comb line, by recording its RF beat note with a narrowband reference laser using the method described in Section 2.3, with various settings of the hybrid laser’s pump current (up to 240 mA). In order to minimize RF line center broadening by technical noise, without having to implement an electronic frequency stabilization, we kept the time duration of the RF recordings short (4 ms). The narrowest beat notes were obtained using a pump current of 190 mA. A set of 40 beat note spectra was recorded sequentially, using a video bandwidth and resolution bandwidth of 1 MHz each, which is sufficient to accurately record the Lorentzian wings of the spectra. Each spectrum in this set was analyzed using a Voigt fit to extract the Lorentzian width. Each spectrum showed a slightly different center position and spectral shape, due to drift of the hybrid laser and reference laser [45]. Two representative examples are shown in Fig. 5, which displays one broader beat note (Lorentzian width 58 kHz, FWHM) and one narrower beat note (22 kHz). The Lorentzian linewidth, obtained by averaging the Lorentzian components of the 40 spectra, is 40 kHz with a standard deviation of 20 kHz. To obtain the intrinsic linewidth of the hybrid laser we subtract the Lorentzian width of the reference laser (6 kHz), which yields a low intrinsic linewidth of approximately 34 kHz. To our knowledge, this linewidth is much lower than reported for any fully on-chip integrated frequency comb laser.
Fig. 5 Measured beat note spectra (data points) obtained by beating the hybrid laser with a narrowband reference laser. Shown are two representative examples of the spectra, one with a broader (circles) and one with a narrower (squares) Lorentzian width. The Lorentzian components, obtained via a Voigt fit, amount to a 58 kHz and 22 kHz linewidth, respectively.
To investigate whether the measured linewidth is consistent with theory, we estimated the expected linewidth of the hybrid laser. For mode-locked lasers without saturable absorber, as is the case here, the intrinsic linewidth of the individual modes is given by the Schawlow-Townes limit using the total average laser output power, as with single-frequency CW lasers [46, 47]. Based on this argument, we use Henry’s formula [7] for the Schawlow-Townes linewidth of a semiconductor laser:
Here, vg is the group velocity, h is Planck’s constant, ν the frequency of the light, nsp the spontaneous emission coefficient, g the gain, αm the mirror loss, α the linewidth enhancement factor, and P0 the laser output power. As the laser consists of two sections (the RSOA and the dielectric feedback circuit), for the evaluation of Eq. (1) we use an approach similar to [48], where g is set equal to αi + αm, with αi the internal loss, and using the following expressions for vg, αi, and αm: Here, αc is the coefficient accounting for the coupling loss at the InP-Si3N4 interface, which is given by with β < 1 the power coupling efficiency between the InP and Si3N4 waveguide. R1 is the power reflection coefficient of the HR coating of the RSOA, and R2 is the effective power reflection coefficient of the feedback mirror on the Si3N4 chip.A known limitation to the precision in evaluating Eq. (1) is that several parameters, such as nsp and α, need to be estimated. For example, typically nsp has a value between 1 and 2, and α may vary between 4 and 6 [43]. The parameters that were used here are listed in Table 1. These are the specified fabrication parameters, combined with parameters from our numerical study of a comparable hybrid laser [42]. For α, we use a value from literature that is typical for semiconductor lasers (α = 5) [43]. In choosing the value of L2, we took into account that the central comb lines are slightly off-resonance with the Vernier filter, which decreases the effective half-roundtrip length of the external feedback circuit (L2 ≈ 1.2 cm). Inserting into Eq. (1) an output power of 2 mW, as was measured during the experiments, and using the parameters of Table 1, we obtain a linewidth of about 41 kHz, which is of the same order as the measured value (34 kHz).
To briefly extrapolate whether the linewidth can be narrowed even further, we repeat the calculation with larger values of the extended resonator branch, L2. When increasing this value to 15 cm, corresponding to an effective roundtrip optical path length Lcav of about 50 cm as in [15], Eq. (1) yields a linewidth of about 370 Hz. We thus expect that by extending the length of the external dielectric waveguide circuit, very low values for the intrinsic comb jitter, in the sub-kHz range, can be achieved.
4. Conclusion
We have presented a hybrid integrated InP-Si3N4 laser that generates frequency combs with a record-low intrinsic linewidth of the comb lines of 34 kHz. This is achieved by extending the cavity photon lifetime using a low-loss Si3N4 waveguide circuit, such that the effective, on-chip roundtrip optical path length is 6 cm. So far the comb spectrum contains lines at a spacing of around 5.5 GHz across a smaller bandwidth (17 lines). However, the spectral coverage may be improved and the line spacing may be reduced by modifying the dielectric feedback circuit. Examples are filters with reduced steepness in the wings of their transmission spectrum, and further extending the length of the laser cavity [49]. Our measured linewidth is more than a factor of 7 narrower than in previous work [6], and already approaches similar values as Kerr combs pumped by narrow-linewidth diode lasers [5]. The measured linewidth matches well with the expected theoretical value. Considering recent progress in reducing the linewidth of single-frequency semiconductor lasers [15], it should be possible to reduce the linewidth of chip-based frequency combs much further, potentially into the sub-100-Hz range.
We note that the described approach is highly universal due to the wide transparency range of the dielectric waveguides. Therefore, comb generation should work equally well for other amplifier materials, including quantum dot amplifiers [50], and may thus be used to construct lasers emitting at other wavelengths, including the visible range. An additional advantage is that, as the dielectric waveguide platform enables complex functionalities, the type of laser shown here is suitable for co-integration with other photonic integrated circuits, e.g., beam forming networks for microwave photonic applications [51]. These options show the important potential of electrically pumped frequency combs based on hybrid and heterogeneous integration using low-loss dielectric waveguide circuits.
Funding
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) (13537).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank T. A. W. Wolterink, H. M. J. Bastiaens, C. G. H. Roeloffzen, and D. Marpaung for support and suggestions.
References
1. I. Coddington, N. Newbury, and W. Swann, “Dual-comb spectroscopy,” Optica 3, 414–426 (2016). [CrossRef]
2. Th. Udem, R. Holzwarth, and T. W. Hänsch, “Optical frequency metrology,” Nature 416, 233–237 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. J. Pfeifle, V. Brasch, M. Lauermann, Y. Yu, D. Wegner, T. Herr, K. Hartinger, P. Schindler, J. Li, D. Hillerkuss, R. Schmogrow, C. Weimann, R. Holzwarth, W. Freude, J. Leuthold, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Koos, “Coherent terabit communications with microresonator Kerr frequency combs,” Nat. Photonics 8, 375–380 (2014). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. D. Marpaung, C. Roeloffzen, R. Heideman, A. Leinse, S. Sales, and J. Capmany, “Integrated microwave photonics,” Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 506–538 (2013). [CrossRef]
5. B. Stern, X. Ji, Y. Okawachi, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, “Battery-operated integrated frequency comb generator,” Nature 562, 401–405 (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Z. Wang, K. Van Gasse, V. Moskalenko, S. Latkowski, E. Bente, B. Kuyken, and G. Roelkens, “A III–V-on-Si ultra-dense comb laser,” Light: Sci. Appl. 6, e16260 (2017). [CrossRef]
7. C. Henry, “Theory of the linewidth of semiconductor lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 18, 259–264 (1982). [CrossRef]
8. S. Cheung, J.-H. Baek, R. P. Scott, N. K. Fontaine, F. M. Soares, X. Zhou, D. M. Baney, and S. J. Ben Yoo, “1-GHz monolithically integrated hybrid mode-locked InP Laser,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22, 1793–1795 (2010). [CrossRef]
9. A. L. Schawlow and C. H. Townes, “Infrared and optical masers,” Phys. Rev. 112, 1940–1949 (1958). [CrossRef]
10. M. W. Fleming and A. Mooradian, “Spectral characteristics of external-cavity controlled semiconductor lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 17, 44–59 (1981). [CrossRef]
11. R. M. Oldenbeuving, E. J. Klein, H. L. Offerhaus, C. J. Lee, H. Song, and K.-J. Boller, “25 kHz narrow spectral bandwidth of a wavelength tunable diode laser with a short waveguide-based external cavity,” Laser Phys. Lett. 10, 015804 (2013). [CrossRef]
12. C. T. Santis, S. T. Steger, Y. Vilenchik, A. Vasilyev, and A. Yariv, “High-coherence semiconductor lasers based on integral high-Q resonators in hybrid Si/III–V platforms,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 2879–2884 (2014). [CrossRef]
13. H. Debregeas, C. Ferrari, M. A. Cappuzzo, F. Klemens, R. Keller, F. Pardo, C. Bolle, C. Xie, and M. P. Earnshaw, “2kHz linewidth C-band tunable laser by hybrid integration of reflective SOA and SiO2 PLC external cavity,” in 2014 International Semiconductor Laser Conference (IEEE, 2014), pp. 50–51.
14. C. Santis, Y. Vilenchik, A. Yariv, N. Satyan, and G. Rakuljic, “Sub-kHz quantum linewidth semiconductor laser on silicon chip,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (Optical Society of America, 2015), paper JTh5A.7.
15. Y. Fan, R. M. Oldenbeuving, C. G. H. Roeloffzen, M. Hoekman, D. Geskus, R. G. Heideman, and K.-J. Boller, “290 Hz intrinsic linewidth from an integrated optical chip-based widely tunable InP-Si3N4 hybrid laser,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (Optical Society of America, 2017), paper JTh5C.9.
16. S. Srinivasan, M. Davenport, M. J. R. Heck, J. Hutchinson, E. Norberg, G. Fish, and J. Bowers, “Low phase noise hybrid silicon mode-locked lasers,” Front. Optoelectron. 7, 265–276 (2014). [CrossRef]
17. S. Srinivasan, E. Norberg, T. Komljenovic, M. Davenport, G. Fish, and J. E. Bowers, “Hybrid silicon colliding-pulse mode-locked lasers with on-chip stabilization,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 21, 1101106 (2015). [CrossRef]
18. S. Keyvaninia, S. Uvin, M. Tassaert, X. Fu, S. Latkowski, J. Mariën, L. Thomassen, F. Lelarge, G. Duan, P. Verheyen, G. Lepage, J. Van Campenhout, E. Bente, and G. Roelkens, “Narrow-linewidth short-pulse III–V-on-silicon mode-locked lasers based on a linear and ring cavity geometry,” Opt. Express 23, 3221–3229 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. S. Keyvaninia, S. Uvin, M. Tassaert, Z. Wang, X. Fu, S. Latkowski, J. Marien, L. Thomassen, F. Lelarge, G. Duan, G. Lepage, P. Verheyen, J. Van Campenhout, E. Bente, and G. Roelkens, “III–V-on-silicon anti-colliding pulse-type mode-locked laser,” Opt. Lett. 40, 3057–3060 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20. M. L. Davenport, S. Liu, and J. E. Bowers, “Integrated heterogeneous silicon/III–V mode-locked lasers,” Photonics Res. 6, 468–478 (2018). [CrossRef]
21. M. J. R. Heck, J. F. Bauters, M. L. Davenport, D. T. Spencer, and J. E. Bowers, “Ultra-low loss waveguide platform and its integration with silicon photonics,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8, 667–686 (2014). [CrossRef]
22. Y. Vilenchik, C. T. Santis, S. T. Steger, N. Satyan, and A. Yariv, “Theory and observation on non-linear effects limiting the coherence properties of high-Q hybrid Si/III–V lasers,” Proc. SPIE 9382, 93820N (2015). [CrossRef]
23. B. Kuyken, F. Leo, S. Clemmen, U. Dave, R. Van Laer, T. Ideguchi, H. Zhao, X. Liu, J. Safioui, S. Coen, S. P. Gorza, S. K. Selvaraja, S. Massar, R. M. Osgood Jr., P. Verheyen, J. Van Campenhout, R. Baets, W. M. J. Green, and G. Roelkens, “Nonlinear optical interactions in silicon waveguides,” Nanophotonics 6, 377–392 (2017). [CrossRef]
24. C. G. H. Roeloffzen, M. Hoekman, E. J. Klein, L. S. Wevers, R. B. Timens, D. Marchenko, D. Geskus, R. Dekker, A. Alippi, R. Grootjans, A. van Rees, R. M. Oldenbeuving, J. P. Epping, R. G. Heideman, K. Wörhoff, A. Leinse, D. Geuzebroek, E. Schreuder, P. W. L. van Dijk, I. Visscher, C. Taddei, Y. Fan, C. Taballione, Y. Liu, D. Marpaung, L. Zhuang, M. Benelajla, and K.-J. Boller, “Low-loss Si3N4 TriPleX optical waveguides: Technology and applications overview,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 4400321 (2018). [CrossRef]
25. K. Wörhoff, R. G. Heideman, A. Leinse, and M. Hoekman, “TriPleX: a versatile dielectric photonic platform,” Adv. Opt. Technol. 4, 189–207 (2015).
26. B. Liu, A. Shakouri, and J. E. Bowers, “Passive microring-resonator-coupled lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3561–3563 (2001). [CrossRef]
27. Y. Fan, J. P. Epping, R. M. Oldenbeuving, C. G. H. Roeloffzen, M. Hoekman, R. Dekker, R. G. Heideman, P. J. M. van der Slot, and K.-J. Boller, “Optically integrated InP-Si3N4 hybrid laser,” IEEE Photonics J. 8, 1505111 (2016). [CrossRef]
28. B. Liu, A. Shakouri, and J. E. Bowers, “Wide tunable double ring resonator coupled lasers,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 14, 600–602 (2002). [CrossRef]
29. D. G. Rabus, Z. Bian, and A. Shakouri, “A GaInAsP-InP double-ring resonator coupled laser,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17, 1770–1772 (2005). [CrossRef]
30. Y. Chung, D.-G. Kim, and N. Dagli, “Widely tunable coupled-ring reflector laser diode,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 17, 1773–1775 (2005). [CrossRef]
31. T. Komljenovic, S. Srinivasan, E. Norberg, M. Davenport, G. Fish, and J. E. Bowers, “Widely tunable narrow-linewidth monolithically integrated external-cavity semiconductor lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 21, 1501909 (2015). [CrossRef]
32. T. Okoshi, K. Kikuchi, and A. Nakayama, “Novel method for high resolution measurement of laser output spectrum,” Electron. Lett. 16, 630–631 (1980). [CrossRef]
33. J. Alnis, A. Matveev, N. Kolachevsky, Th. Udem, and T. W. Hänsch, “Subhertz linewidth diode lasers by stabilization to vibrationally and thermally compensated ultralow-expansion glass Fabry-Pérot cavities,” Phys. Rev. A 77, 053809 (2008). [CrossRef]
34. K. Numata, J. Camp, M. A. Krainak, and L. Stolpner, “Performance of planar-waveguide external cavity laser for precision measurements,” Opt. Express 18, 22781–22788 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. K. Sato, “Optical pulse generation using Fabry-Perot lasers under continuous wave operation,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 9, 1288–1293 (2003). [CrossRef]
36. W. Yang, N. J. Sauer, P. G. Bernasconi, and L. Zhang, “Self-mode-locked single-section Fabry-Perot semiconductor lasers at 1.56 μm,” Appl. Opt. 46, 113–116 (2007). [CrossRef]
37. C. Calò, V. Vujicic, R. Watts, C. Browning, K. Merghem, V. Panapakkam, F. Lelarge, A. Martinez, B.-E. Benkelfat, A. Ramdane, and L. P. Barry, “Single-section quantum well mode-locked laser for 400 Gb/s SSB-OFDM transmission,” Opt. Express 23, 26442–26449 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. J. Renaudier, G.-H. Duan, P. Landais, and P. Gallion, “Phase correlation and linewidth reduction of 40 GHz self-pulsation in distributed Bragg reflector semiconductor lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 43, 147–156 (2007). [CrossRef]
39. M. Dong, S. T. Cundiff, and H. G. Winful, “Physics of frequency-modulated comb generation in quantum-well diode lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 97, 053822 (2018). [CrossRef]
40. Z. G. Lu, J. R. Liu, P. J. Poole, S. Raymond, P. J. Barrios, D. Poitras, G. Pakulski, P. Grant, and D. Roy-Guay, “An L-band monolithic InAs/InP quantum dot mode-locked laser with femtosecond pulses,” Opt. Express 17, 13609–13614 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
41. P. Bardella, L. L. Columbo, and M. Gioannini, “Self-generation of optical frequency comb in single section quantum dot Fabry-Perot lasers: a theoretical study,” Opt. Express 25, 26234–26252 (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Y. Fan, R. E. M. Lammerink, J. Mak, R. M. Oldenbeuving, P. J. M. van der Slot, and K.-J. Boller, “Spectral linewidth analysis of semiconductor hybrid lasers with feedback from an external waveguide resonator circuit,” Opt. Express 25, 32767–32782 (2017). [CrossRef]
43. L. A. Coldren, S. W. Corzine, and M. L. Masšanović, Diode lasers and photonic integrated circuits (Wiley, 2012). [CrossRef]
44. VPItransmissionMaker Optical Systems, www.vpiphotonics.com.
45. N. Von Bandel, M. Myara, M. Sellahi, T. Souici, R. Dardaillon, and P. Signoret, “Time-dependent laser linewidth: beat-note digital acquisition and numerical analysis,” Opt. Express 24, 27961–27978 (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. P.-T. Ho, “Phase and amplitude fluctuations in a mode-locked laser,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21, 1806–1813 (1985). [CrossRef]
47. R. Paschotta, A. Schlatter, S. C. Zeller, H. R. Telle, and U. Keller, “Optical phase noise and carrier-envelope offset noise of mode-locked lasers,” Appl. Phys. B 82, 265–273 (2006). [CrossRef]
48. T. Kita, K. Nemoto, and H. Yamada, “Silicon photonic wavelength-tunable laser diode with asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 8201806 (2014). [CrossRef]
49. J. F. Bauters, M. J. R. Heck, D. D. John, J. S. Barton, C. M. Bruinink, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, D. J. Blumenthal, and J. E. Bowers, “Planar waveguides with less than 0.1 dB/m propagation loss fabricated with wafer bonding,” Opt. Express 19, 24090–24101 (2011). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. D. L. Huffaker, G. Park, Z. Zou, O. B. Shchekin, and D. G. Deppe, “1.3 μm room-temperature GaAs-based quantum-dot laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2564–2566 (1998). [CrossRef]
51. C. G. H. Roeloffzen, L. Zhuang, C. Taddei, A. Leinse, R. G. Heideman, P. W. L. van Dijk, R. M. Oldenbeuving, D. A. I. Marpaung, M. Burla, and K.-J. Boller, “Silicon nitride microwave photonic circuits,” Opt. Express 21, 22937–22961 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
