Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

High photoluminescence quantum yields generated from N-Si-O bonding states in amorphous silicon oxynitride films

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We investigated the high absolute photoluminescence quantum yields (PL QYs) from tunable luminescent amorphous silicon oxynitride (a-SiNxOy) films. The PL QY of 8.38 percent has been achieved at PL peak energy of 2.55 eV in a-SiNxOy systems, which is higher than those of reported nanocrystal-Si embedded silicon nitride films. The existence of N-Si-O bonding states was confirmed by performing FTIR, XPS and EPR measurements. The PL QY is proportional to the concentration of Nx defects, indicating the dominant contribution of luminescent N-Si-O bonding states in radiative recombination processes. Particularly, we precisely monitored the ns-PL lifetimes evolution profile versus detected emission wavelengths, and further verified that the N-Si-O bonding states are responsible for highly efficient PL.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Corrections

Pengzhan Zhang, Leng Zhang, Yaozheng Wu, Sake Wang, and Xuefeng Ge, "High photoluminescence quantum yields generated from N-Si-O bonding states in amorphous silicon oxynitride films: erratum," Opt. Express 30, 40626-40626 (2022)
https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-30-22-40626

1. Introduction

For achieving silicon (Si) based monolithic optoelectronic integration, the most crucial issue urgent to be solved is the high efficient Si-based light source. Unfortunately, Si is a typical indirect band gap material, which limits its efficiency as a light emitter. Thus, Si-based luminescent materials were actively investigated with the main purpose of improving the performance of the PL quantum yields (PL QYs), the electroluminescence (EL) devices, and the related radiative recombination mechanisms in more than past two decades [1–19].

Generally, Si-based luminescent materials exhibit two typical types, Si nano-structured materials, and Si-based compounds. As summarized by Canham [1], the improved PL QY from Si nano-structured materials, such as porous Si [2], colloidal Si quantum dots (Si QDs) [3–5], nanocrystal-Si (NC-Si) embedded thin films [6–9], has been reported previously. By passivating the surface of Si QDs with organic molecules, the PL quantum yields of Si QDs as high as 43% [3] and 60% [4] were obtained. Recently, Shen et al. reported that the measured PL QY of colloidal Si NCs has been enhanced significantly from 23.6% to 55.8% by prolonging the laser ablation time from 30 to 120 min [5]. Negro et al. and Walters et al. reported the PL QY of 7% and PL internal quantum efficiency of 59% ± 9% from NC-Si embedded silicon nitride (SiNx) and silicon dioxide (SiOx) thin films, respectively [7,8]. For EL properties from Si nano-structured materials, Cheng et al. realized an optimized NC Si-organic light-emitting device [10]. Liu et al. obtained the EL QYs of 6.2% from colloidal Octyl-Si QDs LEDs [11]. However, the exciting results from Si-based compounds is still lacking in the open literature [12–15]. In our previous work, we reported the oxygen impurity doped into silicon nitride networks induces the significant enhancement of PL intensity [16]. Then we identified the new luminescent N-Si-O bonding related defect states in the band gap [17,18]. Furthermore, we realized the highly efficient visible LEDs based on phosphorus doped n-a-SiNxOy/p-Si heterojunction structures, and found that the EL peak energy is coincided with that of PL of a-SiNxOy, suggesting the consistent radiative recombination origin in a-SiNxOy systems [19].

In this study, we systematically investigated the absolute PL quantum yields and the related radiative recombination mechanisms for tunable luminescent a-SiNxOy films. The PL QY at PL peak energy (EPL) range of 2.12-2.91 eV was directly measured, and the value of 8.38% has been achieved at EPL = 2.55 eV. By performing the FTIR, XPS and EPR measurements, the existence of N-Si-O bonding states has been confirmed. The PL QY values for varying stoichiometric a-SiNxOy films are proportional to the concentration of N-Si-O bonding related Nx defects, which indicated the dominant contribution of luminescent N-Si-O bonding states to PL QY in radiative recombination processes. We also precisely performed the temperature dependent time resolved PL (TD TR-PL) to monitor the ns-PL lifetimes evolution profile as a function of detected emission wavelengths, thus further verifying the luminescent N-Si-O defect states are responsible for the high efficient PL.

2. Experimental

With adequate adjustment of the gas flow ratio R (R = NH3/SiH4), the varying stoichiometric a-SiNxOy films were deposited on p-Si and quartz substrates by the PECVD (OXFORD Plasmalab 80Plus), using source gases include 5% SiH4 in N2 plus NH3 and N2, and then subsequently oxidized in situ by oxygen plasma treatment. The detailed flow parameters of source gases were described in Table 1. The radio frequency power, reaction pressure, and substrate temperature were kept constant at 20 W, 620 mTorr, and 250 °C. The Tauc’s optical band gap (Eopt) was determined from the transmittance measurements. The steady-state PL spectroscopy were recorded by a Fluorolo-3 system in computer-controlled Delta 9023 oven under 8 K, using a He–Cd laser as excitation source. The absolute PL QY measurements were performed through a calibrated integrating sphere method under the excitation wavelength of 375 nm at room temperature [16]. The chemical compositions and bonding configurations were checked by performing the XPS and FTIR measurements. The EPR measurements (Bruker EMXplus X-band spectrometer) were further used to identify the atomic scale defects generated in the band gap. A FLS980 (Edinburgh Instrument) equipped with a EPL375 pulse diode laser (pulse width ~53 ps, repetition rate = 20 MHz, λexc = 375 nm, pumping fluence WPF = 5 mJ/cm2), and a time-correlated single photo counting (TCSPC) system (time resolution ~100ps) were used to record the characteristics of the temperature dependent time resolved photoluminescence (TD-TRPL) of a-SiNxOy films with different R.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Summary of the fabricating parameters, Eopt, EPL and the PL QY.

3. Results and discussion

As shown in Fig. 1(a), with the increased R range from 0.3 up to 5, the EPL exhibits a blue shift from 2.12 eV to 2.91 eV, which were listed in Table 1, and the bright purple-orange light emission was perceptible by the naked eye [Fig. 1(a) insert]. Then we directly measured the absolute PL QYs in a calibrated integration sphere. Figure 1(b) represents the PL QY measurement processes of a-SiNxOy samples with R = 1.5. We directly measured the total incident excitation photons ϕ0 (black line); the unabsorbed excitation photons ϕ1 and corresponding emitted photons φ1 when the excitation source is direct onto samples (blue line); the unabsorbed excitation photons ϕ2 and corresponding emitted photons φ2 when the excitation source is indirect onto samples (red line). The PL QY is given by

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Normalized PL spectra of a-SiNxOy films for various R. The insets are luminescent photographs of the related samples. (b) The PL QY measurement processes of a-SiNxOy samples for R = 1.5.

Download Full Size | PDF

PLQY=φextϕabs=φ1[1A]×φ2ϕ0×A=ϕ2φ1ϕ1φ2ϕ0×(ϕ2ϕ1),andA=1ϕ1ϕ2

Where φext and ϕabs are the numbers of the emitted photons emitted out of the samples and the numbers of absorbed photons at an excitation wavelength, respectively. A is the film absorbance when the excitation light is direct onto the samples. By using Eq. (1), for R = 1.5, the PL QY of 8.38% has been achieved at EPL = 2.55 eV, which is higher than those of reported NC-Si embedded SiNx films [7]. For the PL peak range of 2.12-2.91 eV, the PL QY values exceeding 1.5% has been achieved in a-SiNxOy samples, which were listed in Table 1 and plotted as a function of R in Fig. 3(b).

The presence of Si, N, and O was measured from the binding energies of Si 2p, N 1s, and O 1s peaks in the obtained XPS spectra. After the top layer (~60 nm) was removed away by Ar ion beam, the relative concentrations of O slightly change and have an average value about 3.96% for various R, and then tend to stabilize with further increasing sputtering times, which is a direct evidence of the incorporated O into a-SiNx networks. The binding energies of Si 2p peaks are located between 101.9 eV of Si3N4 and 103.4 eV of SiO2, which indicates the existence of the N-Si-O bonding configurations in a-SiNxOy films [20,21]. To identify the N-Si-O bonding configurations, we employed the FTIR spectra of a-SiNxOy films (R = 0.8) and the controlled a-SiNx films deposited on double polished Si substrates. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the distorted Si-Si mode (460 cm−1), Si-N stretching mode (900 cm−1), N–H rocking mode (1170 cm−1), Si–H stretching mode (2150 cm−1), and N–H stretching mode (3350 cm−1) vibration peaks are distinctly clear [22]. However, the Si-O stretching mode (1070 cm−1) cannot be seen in both of the two FTIR spectra, suggesting the incorporated oxygen atoms just like doped impurity. From the enlarged Si-N stretching mode vibration peaks, we found that the Si-N stretching peaks of a-SiNxOy films slightly shift to high wavenumber and exhibit a shoulder peak, both of which should be origin from the incorporation of O into a-SiNx and form the N-Si-O bonding configurations, as shown in Fig. 2(b).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) The FTIR spectra of both a-SiNxOy films (R = 0.8) and the controlled a-SiNx films. (b) Enlarged Si-N and Si-O stretching mode in both of the two FTIR spectra.

Download Full Size | PDF

To gain more insight in the relationship between the high PL QY and N-Si-O bonding states, we further employed the EPR measurements. The g values for our a-SiNxOy films with various R have a range about 2.0025~2.0039, and the total spin densities have a range about 3.4 × 1017 cm−3~8.4 × 1017 cm−3. For the amorphous materials, the structure disorders, defects, and composition etc. will influence the g values. Figure 3(a) represents the measured first derivative EPR absorption spectrum of the a-SiNxOy films (R = 0.8) and the controlled a-SiNx films. The measured zero-crossing g value and Gauss line width (Hpp) were listed in Fig. 3(a) insert. We found that the g values in a-SiNxOy samples (g = 2.0034) were larger than those in the controlled a-SiNx films (g = 2.0027), which is as similar as reported in [23]. We precisely considered the possible existence of traditional typical defects in a-SiNxOy systems, such as the K0 center (·SiN3, g = 2.0028), the N20center (Si2 = N·, g = 2.0038), and the N4+center (Si4N·, g = 2.004~2.0045) are common in a-SiNx systems, as well as the Es (·SiO3, g = 2.0008,) and the Er (O3Si···SiO3) are common in a-SiOx systems, etc. Our g values lie between that of the Es defect centers (*SiSiO2, g = 2.0014), and the K defect centers (*SiSi2N, g = 2.0047), and are close to the g values of *SiSiN2 (g = 2.0036) [24]. However, the PL intensity of above mentioned defect states are weak [12], and the PL peak energies are not in the range of our observed PL band [13]. Meanwhile, we noticed that O is affecting the g values of the nitroxide like N center (Nx) in a-SiNx networks, which is the herald of a true a-SiNxOy phase [25,26]. Therefore, we decomposed the measured g values into the trivalent Si dangling bonds (DBs) and N-Si-O related Nx defects by using Lorentzian fitting, which were shown in Fig. 3(b) insert (R = 1.5) [17]. The atom scale defects densities in a-SiNxOy systems can be obtained by using double integration of measured and fitting EPR signals, thus obtaining the coexisted Si DBs and Nx defects densities, which were plotted as a function of R in Fig. 3(b). We found that the variation tendency of the PL QY values for different R was following with the variation tendency of the relative luminescent N-Si-O bonding states densities, and opposite to that of trivalent Si DBs defects. It can help us to understand the dominant contribution of luminescent N-Si-O bonding states to the high PL quantum efficiency in the ultrafast radiative recombination processes of the a-SiNxOy samples, even if the density of Si DBs defect states is higher than that of Nx defect states [12].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) The measured first derivative EPR spectra of a-SiNxOy films (R = 0.8) and the controlled a-SiNx films. The inset shows the relative measured parameters. (b) The PL QY and the spin densities of total defects, Si DBs, and Nx defects vs. R. The inset shows the measured EPR and the deconvolved signals of a-SiNxOy films (R = 1.5).

Download Full Size | PDF

At last, the temperature dependent ns-PL decay properties of a-SiNxOy films have been precisely monitored to analyze the ultrafast recombination processes from luminescent N-Si-O bonding states. Figure 4(a) represents the ns-PL spectra of a-SiNxOy samples with R = 1.5 at 300 K. The ns-PL lifetimes were obtained through the well fitted PL decay curves by usingI(t)=A1exp(t/τ1)+A2exp(t/τ2)+A3exp(t/τ3) withτmeas(T)=i=1nAiτi2Aiτi [27], and have an average value about 7.57 ns. Then we investigated the temperature dependent ns-PL lifetimes [τmeas(T)] of a-SiNxOy samples with R = 1.5, detected at the emission wavelengths (λemi) of 430, 455, 470, 490, 505, 520, 535, 550 nm, respectively. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the τmeas(T) under certain λemi keeps nearly stable at T<160 K, indicating radiative recombination dominates the recombination processes in this measurement temperature range [3,28,29]; while when the measurement temperature rises up (160 K~300 K), the increasing domination of nonradiative recombination results in the decreased τmeas(T). Especially to deserve to be mentioned, the variation tendency of τmeas(T) as a function of λemi under certain temperature is consistent with the spectral profile of stead state PL (see in Fig. 1). This phenomenon once again indicated unique PL properties of luminescent N-Si-O related defect states [30].

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) The measured ns-TRPL decay spectra and the relative fitted decay curves for a-SiNxOy samples with R = 1.5 at 300 K. (b) The ns-PL lifetimes vs. λemi for a-SiNxOy samples (R = 1.5) under measurement temperatures of 8 K, 80 K, 160 K, 240 K, 300 K, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In summary, we have investigated PL quantum yield and the related radiative recombination mechanisms from tunable luminescent a-SiNxOy films. The PL QY of 8.38% has been achieved at PL peak 2.55 eV. We found that the PL QY is proportional to the concentration of N-Si-O bonding states, indicating the dominant contribution of luminescent N-Si-O bonding states in radiative recombination processes. We also checked the ns-PL lifetimes evolution profile vs. detected emission wavelengths, and further verified the luminescent N-Si-O defect states are responsible for the observed PL. The obtained high PL QY generated from N-Si-O bonding states suggested the possibility of high efficient Si-based photonic devices in a-SiNxOy systems.

Funding

National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (No. 11704165); National Science Foundation for Post-doctoral Scientists of China (No. 2017M621711); Science Foundation of Jinling Institute of Technology (No. 40620062, No. 40620064).

References

1. L. T. Canham, “Invited talk on luminescent nanoscale silicon,” in Appl. Phys. Lett.’s 50th Anniversary Reception and Symposium in MRS Fall Meeting (MA), 1–27 (2012).

2. L. Pavesi, “Influence of dispersive exciton motion on the recombination dynamics in porous silicon,” J. Appl. Phys. 80(1), 216–225 (1996). [CrossRef]  

3. M. L. Mastronardi, F. Maier-Flaig, D. Faulkner, E. J. Henderson, C. Kübel, U. Lemmer, and G. A. Ozin, “Size-dependent absolute quantum yields for size-separated colloidally-stable silicon nanocrystals,” Nano Lett. 12(1), 337–342 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. D. Jurbergs, E. Rogojina, L. Mangolini, and U. Kortshagen, “Silicon nanocrystals with ensemble quantum yields exceeding 60%,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(23), 233116 (2006). [CrossRef]  

5. Y. X. Zhang, W. S. Wu, H. L. Hao, and W. Z. Shen, “Femtosecond laser-induced size reduction and emission quantum yield enhancement of colloidal silicon nanocrystals: effect of laser ablation time,” Nanotechnology 29(36), 365706 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. K. J. Chen, X. F. Huang, J. Xu, and D. Feng, “Visible photoluminescence in crystallized amorphous Si:H/SiNx:H multiquantum-well structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 61(17), 2069–2071 (1992). [CrossRef]  

7. L. Dal Negro, J. H. Yi, J. Michel, L. C. Kimerling, T.-W. F. Chang, V. Sukhovatkin, and E. H. Sargent, “Light emission efficiency and dynamics in silicon-rich silicon nitride Films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(23), 233109 (2006). [CrossRef]  

8. R. J. Walters, J. Kalkman, A. Polman, H. A. Atwater, and M. J. A. de Dood, “Photoluminescence quantum efficiency of dense silicon nanocrystal ensembles in SiO2,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 73(13), 132302 (2006). [CrossRef]  

9. Q. Li, T. Y. Luo, M. Zhou, H. Abroshan, J. Huang, H. J. Kim, N. L. Rosi, Z. Shao, and R. Jin, “Silicon nanoparticles with surface nitrogen: 90% quantum yield with narrow luminescence bandwidth and the ligand structure based energy law,” ACS Nano 10(9), 8385–8393 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. K. Y. Cheng, R. Anthony, U. R. Kortshagen, and R. J. Holmes, “High-efficiency silicon nanocrystal light-emitting devices,” Nano Lett. 11(5), 1952–1956 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. X. Liu, S. Zhao, W. Gu, Y. Zhang, X. Qiao, Z. Ni, X. Pi, and D. Yang, “Light-emitting diodes based on colloidal silicon quantum dots with octyl and phenylpropyl ligands,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(6), 5959–5966 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. H. Kato, A. Masuzawa, T. Noma, K. S. Seol, and Y. Ohki, “Thermally induced photoluminescence quenching centre in hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxynitride,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 13(30), 6541–6549 (2001). [CrossRef]  

13. P. D. Nguyen, D. M. Kepaptsoglou, Q. M. Ramasse, M. F. Sunding, L. O. Vestland, T. G. Finstad, and A. Olsen, “Impact of oxygen bonding on the atomic structure and photoluminescence properties of Si-rich silicon nitride thin films,” J. Appl. Phys. 112(7), 073514 (2012). [CrossRef]  

14. R. Ruggeri, F. Neri, A. Sciuto, V. Privitera, C. Spinella, and G. Mannino, “Luminescence properties of SiOxNy irradiated by IR laser 808nm: the role of Si quantum dots and Si chemical environment,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100(4), 042104 (2012). [CrossRef]  

15. S. K. Jou, I. C. Liaw, Y. C. Cheng, and C. H. Li, “Light emission of silicon oxynitride films prepared by reactive sputtering of silicon,” J. Lumin. 134, 853–857 (2013). [CrossRef]  

16. P. Z. Zhang, K. J. Chen, H. P. Dong, P. Zhang, Z. H. Fang, W. Li, J. Xu, and X. F. Huang, “Higher than 60% internal quantum efficiency of photoluminescence from amorphous silicon oxynitride thin films at wavelength of 470 nm,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105(1), 011113 (2014). [CrossRef]  

17. P. Z. Zhang, K. J. Chen, Z. W. Lin, H. P. Dong, W. Li, J. Xu, and X. F. Huang, “The role of N-Si-O bonding configurations in tunable photoluminescence of oxygenated amorphous silicon nitride films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(23), 231103 (2015). [CrossRef]  

18. P. Zhang, K. Chen, Z. Lin, D. Tan, H. Dong, W. Li, J. Xu, and X. Huang, “Dynamics of high quantum efficiency photoluminescence from N-Si-O bonding states in oxygenated amorphous silicon nitride films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 108(11), 111103 (2016). [CrossRef]  

19. Z. W. Lin, K. J. Chen, P. Z. Zhang, J. Xu, W. Li, H. F. Yang, and X. F. Huang, “Improved power efficiency in phosphorus doped n-a-SiNxOy/p-Si heterojunction light emitting diode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 110(8), 081109 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. S. Naskar, S. D. Wolter, C. A. Bower, B. R. Stoner, and J. T. Glass, “Verification of the O–Si–N complex in plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition silicon oxynitride films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87(26), 261907 (2005). [CrossRef]  

21. P. Cova, S. Poulin, O. Grenier, and R. A. Masut, “A method for the analysis of multiphase bonding structures in amorphous SiOxNy films,” J. Appl. Phys. 97(7), 073518 (2005). [CrossRef]  

22. W. S. Liao, C. H. Lin, and S. C. Lee, “Oxidation of silicon nitride prepared by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition at low temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 65(17), 2229–2231 (1994). [CrossRef]  

23. S. Garcia, D. Bravo, M. Fernandez, I. Martil, and F. J. López, “Role of oxygen on the dangling bond configuration of low oxygen content SiNx:H films deposited at room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 67(22), 3263–3265 (1995). [CrossRef]  

24. F. H. P. M. Habraken and A. E. T. Kuiper, “Silicon nitride and oxynitride films,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 12(3), 123–175 (1994). [CrossRef]  

25. Y. Cros and J. Krautwurm, “Structural identification of point defects in amorphous silicon oxynitrides,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 187, 385–394 (1995). [CrossRef]  

26. W. L. Warren, J. Kanicki, and E. H. Poindexter, “Paramagnetic point defects in silicon nitride and silicon oxynitride thin films on silicon,” Colloid Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 115, 311–317 (1996). [CrossRef]  

27. K. H. Lin, S. C. Liou, W. L. Chen, C. L. Wu, G. R. Lin, and Y. M. Chang, “Tunable and stable UV-NIR photoluminescence from annealed SiOx with Si nanoparticles,” Opt. Express 21(20), 23416–23424 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. W. L. Wilson, P. F. Szajowski, and L. E. Brus, “Quantum confinement in size-selected, surface-oxidized silicon nanocrystals,” Science 262(5137), 1242–1244 (1993). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. A. M. Hartel, S. Gutsch, D. Hiller, and M. Zacharias, “Intrinsic nonradiative recombination in ensembles of silicon nanocrystals,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 87(3), 035428 (2013). [CrossRef]  

30. G. B. De los Reyes, M. Dasog, M. Na, L. V. Titova, J. G. C. Veinot, and F. A. Hegmann, “Charge transfer state emission dynamics in blue-emitting functionalized silicon nanocrystals,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17(44), 30125–30133 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Normalized PL spectra of a-SiNxOy films for various R. The insets are luminescent photographs of the related samples. (b) The PL QY measurement processes of a-SiNxOy samples for R = 1.5.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) The FTIR spectra of both a-SiNxOy films (R = 0.8) and the controlled a-SiNx films. (b) Enlarged Si-N and Si-O stretching mode in both of the two FTIR spectra.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) The measured first derivative EPR spectra of a-SiNxOy films (R = 0.8) and the controlled a-SiNx films. The inset shows the relative measured parameters. (b) The PL QY and the spin densities of total defects, Si DBs, and Nx defects vs. R. The inset shows the measured EPR and the deconvolved signals of a-SiNxOy films (R = 1.5).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) The measured ns-TRPL decay spectra and the relative fitted decay curves for a-SiNxOy samples with R = 1.5 at 300 K. (b) The ns-PL lifetimes vs. λemi for a-SiNxOy samples (R = 1.5) under measurement temperatures of 8 K, 80 K, 160 K, 240 K, 300 K, respectively.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Summary of the fabricating parameters, Eopt, EPL and the PL QY.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

P L QY= φ ext ϕ abs = φ 1 [1A]× φ 2 ϕ 0 ×A = ϕ 2 φ 1 ϕ 1 φ 2 ϕ 0 ×( ϕ 2 ϕ 1 ) , and A=1 ϕ 1 ϕ 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.