Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

High-efficiency hybrid amorphous silicon grating couplers for sub-micron-sized lithium niobate waveguides

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We demonstrate hybrid amorphous silicon uniform grating couplers for efficient coupling between the standard single-mode fiber and sub-micron lithium niobate waveguides. The grating couplers exhibit coupling efficiency of −3.06 dB and 1-dB bandwidth of 55 nm. The amorphous silicon grating couplers can also provide a universal building block applicable to other photonic platforms such as silicon nitride waveguides, whose moderate refractive index values prevent high efficiency grating couplers to be fabricated in the native waveguide.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Lithium niobate (LN) has excellent electro-optic (r33) and optical nonlinear (d33) properties, with very low optical absorption in a wide wavelength range. Its refractive index (~2.2) allows to form relatively strongly confined waveguides with conventional cladding material such as silica. Novel technologies including ion slicing and wafer bonding enable production of LN films on insulator (LNOI) substrates for fabricating waveguide devices with loss value of less than 0.03 dB/cm [1], and high quality factor microcavities of with Q factor exceeding 106 [1–3]. The sub-micron sized waveguide is an order of magnitude smaller than the conventional diffusion-type LN waveguides, enabling high performance Mach-Zehnder modulators (MZM) with low drive voltage [4] and ultra-board bandwidth up to 100 GHz [5]. Optical fields are highly confined in these sub-micron waveguides and structures, facilitating enhanced optical field intensity and low threshold for nonlinear optics applications such as second-harmonic generations [6–8].

Conventional edge coupling between standard single mode fiber (SMF) and LN waveguides has relatively high coupling loss [9], mainly due to the optical mode mismatch between the fiber and waveguide. The best edge-coupling efficiency demonstrated by lensed fiber to LN ridge waveguide is about −5 dB per facet [4,6]. Coupling sub-micron sized LN waveguides with flat-end SMF posts even higher challenges, and no such edge-coupling is reported yet.

Grating couplers, without dicing, cleaving and polishing processes [10], are favorable couplers between SMF and sub-micron-sized waveguides. They have achieved extensive successes in silicon photonics on silicon on insulator (SOI) substrates [10–17]. The highest coupling efficiency of silicon-only apodized grating coupler (AGC) is ~−1 dΒ [16,17]. In the case of sub-micron sized LN waveguides, uniform grating couplers directly etched on waveguide [18–20] were recently demonstrated with −10-dB coupling efficiencies. The coupling efficiency can be improved to −6.9 dB by employing back reflectors [21,22]. The coupling efficiencies are much lower than those in SOI (~−3 dB), mainly due to the LN has lower refractive index (~2.2) than Si (~3.5), and etching LN grating teeth with vertical profile is very difficult.

Here, we demonstrate a hybrid grating coupler on LN thin film using amorphous silicon (a-Si) as grating teeth. The a-Si grating has two-fold benefits in achieving high coupling efficiency: firstly, a-Si has higher refractive index [23–26]; secondly the etch profile of the a-Si is sharper than that of the LN etch. Similar grating structures has been demonstrated using focused ion beam etching method, realizing SMF to Si/LN rib-loaded waveguide coupling with efficiency of −18 dB [27].

2. Design and simulation

Figure 1 shows the schematic of our device structure. We use an x-cut lithium niobate on insulator on silicon substrate (LNOIXSi) chip as the substrate. The orientation of + z axis is out of the paper, and the light travels along the y axis. We define T and Λ as the teeth width and period of the a-Si grating, da-Si as the height of the a-Si grating and dSiO2 as the thickness of the silica buffer layer between a-Si and LN thin film. The light coming out of the grating will be coupled into a SMF with an angle of θ with respect to the normal direction of the chip surface. The grating coupler is coated with silica cladding.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematics of amorphous silicon grating on LN thin film.

Download Full Size | PDF

The governing equation for the phase-matching condition of a grating coupler is [10]:

β-mK=ky
where β = 2πneff is the propagation constant of the waveguide mode, neff is the effective index of the TE waveguide mode, K = 2π/Λ is the reciprocal lattice vector of grating and ky = 2πncladsinθ/λ is the projected wave vector of the emitted light on y axis, nclad is the refractive index of the cladding. For a coupler with silica cladding, the parameter nclad is 1.44. We take the diffraction order m = + 1, in order to guarantee the upward optical power can be efficiently collected by the fiber and avoid high second order diffraction, the fiber angle should be slightly tilted from the normal direction (~8-10°). The grating coupler is numerically simulated using a 2-D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. The resolution of simulation region is 1/10 wavelength. A genetic algorithm, similar to the method in [28], was applied to optimize the coupling efficiency and 1-dB bandwidth. The teeth width T, period Λ, and height of a-Si grating da-Si, and silica buffer layer dSiO2 were set as variables to obtain a uniform grating for transverse-electric (TE) mode with optimized efficiency-bandwidth product. A while loop is employed in the iterative optimization, and in each iteration, all parameters are tuned by 5 nm. The iteration stops when the optimal results are reached. The achieved optimized parameters are listed in Table 1. The thickness of silica cladding dclad is set to be 1.5 μm.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Optimized parameters of a-Si grating on LN thin film by genetic algorithm.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of Ez of the TE polarization. The maximum simulated coupling efficiency is − 2.7dB at 1553.5 nm, taking into account the overlap integral between upward electric filed and the Gaussian profile that approximates the fiber mode.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Ez distribution of TE mode simulated by a 2D FDTD method.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Device fabrication and measurement

Our devices were fabricated on 14 mm × 12 mm x-cut LNOIXSi chips diced from a 3-inch wafer from NANOLN, with LN film of 600 nm thickness bonded on top of a 2-μm silica buffer layer on silicon substrate. A brief description of the grating coupler process flow is shown in Fig. 3(a). The LN waveguide patterns were defined by E-beam lithography (EBL) and subsequently etched with an optimized argon plasma in an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching system. The details of the process (from the step1 to 4 in Fig. 3(a)) was described in our previous work [29]. The etch depth of LN is ~240 nm. After LN sidewall cleaning and mask removal, a 90-nm-thick silica layer were deposited by inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition (ICP-CVD) to improve the adhesion of a-Si growth. Afterwards, the 220-nm-thick a-Si layer was grown with SiH4/Ar at 300°C using a plasma enhanced CVD process. The refractive index of a-Si is 3.467 at 1550 nm measured by ellipsometer. Hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ, FOX-16 by Dow Corning) is spin-coated on the a-Si for EBL. The grating patterns are transferred into the a-Si layer using ICP etching with an HBr chemistry. Figure 3(b) shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of the hybrid a-Si grating coupler, which is sitting on the end of the LN adiabatic taper. The zoom-in image Fig. 3(c) reveals feature of the a-Si grating coupler with vertical and smooth sidewalls but a relatively rough top surface. Finally, the devices are coated with a 1.5-μm thick silica top cladding.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Fabrication process of device. (a) a brief description of process flow: a diced x-cut LNOIXSi chip (1) is deposited by a thin Ti layer and spin coating with HSQ. The waveguide pattern is defined by EBL (2) and etched by optimized argon plasma in ICP (3). Re-deposition on sidewall is cleaned by standard clean solution 1 (SC-1) and the residual mask is removed by diluted HF (4). 90-nm silica layer and 220-nm a-Si layer are deposited successively by ICP-CVD (5). HSQ is spin coating again for grating-pattern transfer by EBL (6). The grating-pattern is transferred to a-Si by ICP etching (7). A 1.5-μm silica cladding is deposited by ICP-CVD (8). (b) SEM image of hybrid a-Si grating coupler on LN thin film before silica coated. (c). Zoom in SEM image.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Measurement results and discussions

Figures 4(a) and 4(b) show the microscope images taken from downward and horizontal cameras when we measure the device using conventional single-mode fiber as input and output. The length of the adiabatic taper is 500 μm. Figure 4(c) shows the spectrum measurement setup. We used a high-precision external cavity tunable laser (Agilent 81600B) as the light source in 1550-nm range. The input polarization was adjusted by a fiber polarization controller. The position and angle of the two coupling fibers were aligned by two six-axis stages and monitored by the downward and horizontal microscopes. The estimated fiber angle to the chip normal is about 12° in Fig. 4(b). The output power was detected by an optical power meter. The tunable laser source and the power meter were connected by a computer to enable wavelength scanning and power data recording. The measurement setup is calibrated via Agilent lightwave measurement system (Agilent 8164B) and its supporting plug-in (insertion loss measurement). The output power of tunable laser is 0 dB in the range of 1500 nm to 1600 nm. The calibration began with scanning the insertion loss of SMF 1 and polarization controller. The insertion loss of the SMF 1 and polarization controller was in the range of −0.2 dB to −1.8 dB, and set as the back-ground reference. Then we obtained a flatten spectrum with a fluctuation of ± 0.015dB in the whole scanning wavelength. The insertion loss of each SMFs 2 and 3 is ~−0.3 dB, which is directly measured by power meter. Therefore, all measured losses have been calibrated to exclude the insertion loss of the fibers and polarization controller.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Top-view image (a) and side-view image (b) taken from downward and horizontal cameras respectively. Wafer-scale testing is realized on LN platform. (c) Spectrum measurement setup.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 5(a) shows the measured spectrum of samples with four different waveguide length. And Fig. 5(b) shows the measured fiber-to-fiber loss at 1552.5 nm. The fitted line intercept at approximately −6.13 dB, representing the total coupling loss of both input and output grating couplers. The single grating coupling efficiency is thus −3.06 dB. The slope of the fitted line indicates that the waveguide propagation loss is 4.3 dB/cm.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 (a) The measured spectrum of samples with four different waveguide length. (b) Fiber-to-fiber loss vary with waveguide length at 1552.5 nm. The intercept of fitted line represents the coupling loss of input and output coupler and the slope represents the propagation loss of the waveguide.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 6 shows the wavelength dependency of the grating coupler. The measured transmission spectrum with waveguide widths of 1 μm (solid line) is compared with the simulation result (dashed line). Table 2 summarizes key values between the experiment and the simulation. The measured coupling loss of −3.06 dB is approximately 0.3 dB lower than the simulated one. The measured 1-dB bandwidth is 55 nm and comparable to the simulated bandwidth of 59 nm. The incident angle to achieve best coupling in the experiment is about 12 degree, slightly deviates from the simulated 13.5 degree. Material loss, fabrication deviations and the coupling stage deviations could account for the discrepancies between the measurement and the simulation. It is worth mentioning that the optical loss of the adiabatic taper attributes to the loss term of grating coupler. Eigenmode expansion (EME) method proved that the optical loss of the adiabatic taper is −0.066 dB. That means the coupling efficiency of our grating coupler may be higher than −3 dB.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 The transmission spectrums of a-Si grating couplers. Simulation result is shown in red dash line. Experimental result is shown in blue.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 2. Comparison with simulation and experimental results

Table 3 compares our work and demonstrated grating couplers on LN thin film in previous literatures. Our hybrid coupler sets a record of the demonstrated grating coupler on thin-film LN waveguide with an improvement of >3 dB over the nearest reported data and also wider bandwidth. The coupling efficiency of −3.06 dB is also quite comparable to demonstrated uniform silicon grating couplers in silicon photonic waveguide platforms [11].

Tables Icon

Table 3. Demonstrated grating coupler on thin-film LN waveguide

5. Conclusion

We designed and demonstrated hybrid a-Si uniform grating couplers for TE mode on LN thin film ridge waveguides. Coupling efficiency up to −3.06 dB and 1-dB bandwidth of 55 nm have been experimentally obtained, significantly improving the state-of-art in fiber-waveguide coupling of LN thin film devices. The grating performance can be further improved by optimizing the thickness of the silica cladding and by employing nonuniform AGC structures that can also minimize the Fabry-Perot reflections [15–17,30]. The demonstrated a-Si grating couplers pave the way to LN photonic chips with low fiber-to-fiber insertion loss. Entirely compatible to standard fabrication flow with no high temperature (400 °C or above) processing, such a-Si grating coupler has the potential to become a universal building block applicable to other photonic platforms such as silicon nitride waveguides where the modest waveguide refractive index prevents the fabrication of high coupling efficiency grating coupler directly in the waveguide material.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (U1701661, 61490715); Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (201707020017); Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (2017BT01X121).

References

1. M. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, and M. Lončar, “Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium niobate microring resonator,” Optica 4(12), 1536–1537 (2017). [CrossRef]  

2. R. Wolf, I. Breunig, H. Zappe, and K. Buse, “Cascaded second-order optical nonlinearities in on-chip micro rings,” Opt. Express 25(24), 29927–29933 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. R. Wolf, Y. Jia, S. Bonaus, C. S. Werner, S. J. Herr, I. Breunig, K. Buse, and H. Zappe, “Quasi-phase-matched nonlinear optical frequency conversion in on-chip whispering galleries,” Optica 5(7), 872–875 (2018). [CrossRef]  

4. C. Wang, M. Zhang, B. Stern, M. Lipson, and M. Lončar, “Nanophotonic lithium niobate electro-optic modulators,” Opt. Express 26(2), 1547–1555 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams-Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lončar, “100-GHz Low Voltage Integrated Lithium Niobate Modulators,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2018), SM3B.4. [CrossRef]  

6. C. Wang, X. Xiong, N. Andrade, V. Venkataraman, X.-F. Ren, G.-C. Guo, and M. Lončar, “Second harmonic generation in nano-structured thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,” Opt. Express 25(6), 6963–6973 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. R. Luo, Y. He, H. Liang, M. Li, and Q. Lin, “Highly tunable efficient second-harmonic generation in a lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguide,” Optica 5(8), 1006–1011 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. C. Wang, C. Langrock, A. Marandi, M. Jankowski, M. Zhang, B. Desiatov, M. M. Fejer, and M. Lončar, “Second-harmonic generation in nanophotonic PPLN waveguides with ultrahigh efficiencies,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2018), JTh5A.2. [CrossRef]  

9. I. Krasnokutska, J. J. Tambasco, X. Li, and A. Peruzzo, “Ultra-low loss photonic circuits in lithium niobate on insulator,” Opt. Express 26(2), 897–904 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. D. Vermeulen, S. Selvaraja, P. Verheyen, G. Lepage, W. Bogaerts, P. Absil, D. Van Thourhout, and G. Roelkens, “High-efficiency fiber-to-chip grating couplers realized using an advanced CMOS-compatible Silicon-On-Insulator platform,” Opt. Express 18(17), 18278–18283 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. D. Taillaert, F. Van Laere, M. Ayre, W. Bogaerts, D. Van Thourhout, P. Bienstman, and R. Baets, “Grating couplers for coupling between optical fibers and nanophotonic waveguides,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45(8A8R), 6071–6077 (2006). [CrossRef]  

12. Y. Ding, C. Peucheret, H. Ou, and K. Yvind, “Fully etched apodized grating coupler on the SOI platform with -0.58 dB coupling efficiency,” Opt. Lett. 39(18), 5348–5350 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. L. Zhu, W. Yang, and C. Chang-Hasnain, “Very high efficiency optical coupler for silicon nanophotonic waveguide and single mode optical fiber,” Opt. Express 25(15), 18462–18473 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. Y. Luo, Z. Nong, S. Gao, H. Huang, Y. Zhu, L. Liu, L. Zhou, J. Xu, L. Liu, S. Yu, and X. Cai, “Low-loss two-dimensional silicon photonic grating coupler with a backside metal mirror,” Opt. Lett. 43(3), 474–477 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. D. Taillaert, P. Bienstman, and R. Baets, “Compact efficient broadband grating coupler for silicon-on-insulator waveguides,” Opt. Lett. 29(23), 2749–2751 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. X. Chen, C. Li, C. K. Y. Fung, S. M. G. Lo, and H. K. Tsang, “Apodized Waveguide Grating Couplers for Efficient Coupling to Optical Fibers,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22(15), 1156–1158 (2010). [CrossRef]  

17. J. Sun, C. Zhang, X. Xiao, W. Sun, X. Zhang, T. Chu, J. Yu, and Y. Yu, “High Efficiency Grating Coupler for Coupling between Single-Mode Fiber and SOI Waveguides,” Chin. Phys. Lett. 30(1), 014207 (2013). [CrossRef]  

18. M. Mahmoud, S. Ghosh, and G. Piazza, “Lithium niobate on Insulator (LNOI) grating couplers,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2015, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2015), SW4I.7. [CrossRef]  

19. M. A. Baghban, J. Schollhammer, C. Errando-Herranz, K. B. Gylfason, and K. Gallo, “Bragg gratings in thin-film LiNbO3 waveguides,” Opt. Express 25(26), 32323–32332 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. M. S. Nisar, X. Zhao, A. Pan, S. Yuan, and J. Xia, “Grating coupler for an on-chip lithium niobate ridge waveguide,” IEEE Photonics J. 9(1), 1–8 (2017). [CrossRef]  

21. Z. Chen, Y. W. Wang, Y. P. Jiang, R. R. Kong, and H. Hu, “Grating coupler on single-crystal lithium niobate thin film,” Opt. Mater. 72, 136–139 (2017). [CrossRef]  

22. Z. Chen, R. Peng, Y. Wang, H. Zhu, and H. Hu, “Grating coupler on lithium niobate thin film waveguide with a metal bottom reflector,” Opt. Mater. Express 7(11), 4010–4017 (2017). [CrossRef]  

23. Y. Wang, Z. Chen, L. Cai, Y. Jiang, H. Zhu, and H. Hu, “Amorphous silicon-lithium niobate thin film strip-loaded waveguides,” Opt. Mater. Express 7(11), 4018–4028 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. W.-J. Liu, S. Chen, H.-Y. Cheng, J.-D. Lin, and S.-L. Fu, “Fabrication of amorphous silicon films for arrayed waveguide grating application,” Surf. Coat. Tech. 201(15), 6581–6584 (2007). [CrossRef]  

25. M. J. A. de Dood, A. Polman, T. Zijlstra, and E. van der Drift, “Amorphous silicon waveguides for microphotonics,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(2), 649–653 (2002). [CrossRef]  

26. Y. Shoji, T. Ogasawara, T. Kamei, Y. Sakakibara, S. Suda, K. Kintaka, H. Kawashima, M. Okano, T. Hasama, H. Ishikawa, and M. Mori, “Ultrafast nonlinear effects in hydrogenated amorphous silicon wire waveguide,” Opt. Express 18(6), 5668–5673 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. Z. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, and H. Hu, “Silicon grating coupler on a lithium niobate thin film waveguide,” Opt. Mater. Express 8(5), 1253–1258 (2018). [CrossRef]  

28. P. Xu, Y. Zhang, Z. Shao, L. Liu, L. Zhou, C. Yang, Y. Chen, and S. Yu, “High-efficiency wideband SiNx-on-SOI grating coupler with low fabrication complexity,” Opt. Lett. 42(17), 3391–3394 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. J. Jian, H. Chen, L. Liu, L. Zhou, Z. Wu, Y. Chen, and S. Yu, “High Quality Factor Dry-etched Lithium Niobate Ridge Waveguide Micro-ring Resonators,” in Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2017), S3J.2. [CrossRef]  

30. T. Lipka, L. Moldenhauer, J. Müller, and H. K. Trieu, “Photonic integrated circuit components based on amorphous silicon-on-insulator technology,” Photon. Res. 4(3), 126–134 (2016). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematics of amorphous silicon grating on LN thin film.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Ez distribution of TE mode simulated by a 2D FDTD method.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Fabrication process of device. (a) a brief description of process flow: a diced x-cut LNOIXSi chip (1) is deposited by a thin Ti layer and spin coating with HSQ. The waveguide pattern is defined by EBL (2) and etched by optimized argon plasma in ICP (3). Re-deposition on sidewall is cleaned by standard clean solution 1 (SC-1) and the residual mask is removed by diluted HF (4). 90-nm silica layer and 220-nm a-Si layer are deposited successively by ICP-CVD (5). HSQ is spin coating again for grating-pattern transfer by EBL (6). The grating-pattern is transferred to a-Si by ICP etching (7). A 1.5-μm silica cladding is deposited by ICP-CVD (8). (b) SEM image of hybrid a-Si grating coupler on LN thin film before silica coated. (c). Zoom in SEM image.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Top-view image (a) and side-view image (b) taken from downward and horizontal cameras respectively. Wafer-scale testing is realized on LN platform. (c) Spectrum measurement setup.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) The measured spectrum of samples with four different waveguide length. (b) Fiber-to-fiber loss vary with waveguide length at 1552.5 nm. The intercept of fitted line represents the coupling loss of input and output coupler and the slope represents the propagation loss of the waveguide.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 The transmission spectrums of a-Si grating couplers. Simulation result is shown in red dash line. Experimental result is shown in blue.

Tables (3)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Optimized parameters of a-Si grating on LN thin film by genetic algorithm.

Tables Icon

Table 2 Comparison with simulation and experimental results

Tables Icon

Table 3 Demonstrated grating coupler on thin-film LN waveguide

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

β - m K = k y
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.