Open Access
Add to BibSonomyAbstract
In the earlier paper [Opt. Express. 21, A111 (2013)], Fig. 6, Fig. 10, and Fig. 13 were improperly given. They are updated here, and the modifications do not significantly change the paper’s findings.
©2013 Optical Society of America
In the article [1] we designed and numerically investigated three different types of absorbers. Due to the errors in processing the calculated data, Fig. 6, Fig. 10, and Fig. 13, which correspond to non-normal incidence, need to be updated. However, the modifications do not have significant influence on paper's findings.
2. Bottle-like narrowband absorber
Fig. 6 Absorbance as functions of wavelengths and incident angles. (a) E⊥Syz (b) H⊥Syz (c) E⊥Sxz (d) H⊥Sxz.
3. Cup-like narrowband absorber
Fig. 10 Absorbance as functions of wavelengths and incident angles. (a) E⊥Syz (b) H⊥Syz (c) E⊥Sxz (d) H⊥Sxz. Here H=100 nm, d=90 nm.
4. Broadband absorber
Fig. 13 Absorbance as functions of wavelength and incident angle. (a) E⊥Syz (b) H⊥Syz (c) E⊥Sxz (d) H⊥Sxz.
References and links
1. L. Meng, D. Zhao, Q. Li, and M. Qiu, “Polarization-sensitive perfect absorbers at near-infrared wavelengths,” Opt. Express 21(S1), A111–A122 (2013). [CrossRef]
