Abstract
Wind speed and sonic temperature measured with ultrasonic anemometers are often utilized to estimate the refractive index structure parameter $C_n^2$, a vital parameter for optical propagation. In this work, we compare four methods to estimate $C_n^2$ from $C_T^2$, using the same temporal sonic temperature data streams for two separated sonic anemometers on a homogenous path. Values of $C_n^2$ obtained with these four methods using field trial data are compared to those from a commercial scintillometer and from the differential image motion method using a grid of light sources positioned at the end of a common path. In addition to the comparison between the methods, we also consider appropriate error bars for $C_n^2$ based on sonic temperature considering only the errors from having a finite number of turbulent samples. The Bayesian and power spectral methods were found to give adequate estimates for strong turbulence levels but consistently overestimated the $C_n^2$ for weak turbulence. The nearest neighbors and structure function methods performed well under all turbulence strengths tested.
© 2024 Optica Publishing Group
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Steven Fiorino, Yogendra Raut, Jaclyn Schmidt, Laura Slabaugh, Blaine Fourman, Jack McCrae, Benjamin Wilson, and Santasri Bose-Pillai
Appl. Opt. 63(16) E78-E85 (2024)
Joseph Coffaro, Martin Richardson, Robert Bernath, and Robert Crabbs
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 39(4) 643-654 (2022)
Ravikiran Hegde, N. Anand, S. K. Satheesh, and K. Krishna Moorthy
Appl. Opt. 63(16) E10-E17 (2024)